Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CatWoman

(80,333 posts)
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 11:55 AM Jan 2023

Biden just finished a press conference

and took questions.

Unlike Trump.

Biden actually took and answered questions regarding the "classified documents", er, controversy.

He's not trying to run and hide.

He hasn't taken to social media to rant, rave and point fingers.

He actually took and answered questions.

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Biden just finished a press conference (Original Post) CatWoman Jan 2023 OP
What did he say? Ocelot II Jan 2023 #1
takes classified documents seriously CatWoman Jan 2023 #3
lol. One would think that would be important. The business outlets indicated he would be talking JohnSJ Jan 2023 #4
he did talk about that CatWoman Jan 2023 #5
Thanks CatWomen. They found a couple of places with a basal carcinoma skin cancer, and had them JohnSJ Jan 2023 #6
Basal cell carcinoma is slow growing and very treatable. Liberty Belle Jan 2023 #18
She had dweller Jan 2023 #7
I read that Jill claudette Jan 2023 #8
MOHS surgery generally is an outpatient scenario. jaxexpat Jan 2023 #15
Peter Doocy was the one that asked him how she was doing. MichMan Jan 2023 #11
I'm sure he was sincere. Kingofalldems Jan 2023 #12
Or as I like to call him, Peter Douchey. ShazzieB Jan 2023 #28
He was set up housecat Jan 2023 #31
Why do the press yell out questions instead of waiting to be called on? Deuxcents Jan 2023 #2
Perhaps they have hearing problems? JohnSJ Jan 2023 #9
Because they are claudette Jan 2023 #10
That's not true. Geesh Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2023 #23
If the administration doesn't ask if there are any questions , that is their only chance. MichMan Jan 2023 #13
joe did open it up for questions.... getagrip_already Jan 2023 #16
As one who's been in those competitive scrums, I can try to explain it. calimary Jan 2023 #19
Thanks, Cali - great explanation! MyOwnPeace Jan 2023 #21
Peter Doocy. Fox News. Maybe that's all we need to know. calimary Jan 2023 #26
Totally agree Rebl2 Jan 2023 #14
Big egos in the press? KS Toronado Jan 2023 #17
Did he Traildogbob Jan 2023 #20
That is good to know but the problem is no matter how sanely he responds to this, the right LymphocyteLover Jan 2023 #22
You are absolutely right! Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2023 #24
I hope his team is alert to dirty GOP tricks. yardwork Jan 2023 #25
What I have always found confusing is the process by which an individual with clearance "aquires"... usaf-vet Jan 2023 #27
There's no central repository for classified documents. BlueCheeseAgain Jan 2023 #29
That should piss off the "media".. Cha Jan 2023 #30
It won't matter Meowmee Jan 2023 #32
Answers which they will twist and distort... but good on him. live love laugh Jan 2023 #33

CatWoman

(80,333 posts)
3. takes classified documents seriously
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 12:02 PM
Jan 2023

cooperating fully with DOJ

and I think the docs were turned over to DOJ?

 

JohnSJ

(98,883 posts)
4. lol. One would think that would be important. The business outlets indicated he would be talking
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 12:03 PM
Jan 2023

about the state of inflation, but no doubt I am sure the illustrious press will ask him about the classified documents, and I wouldn't be surprised if some in the press corps make verbal comments in their questions trying to equate it with what trump did



CatWoman

(80,333 posts)
5. he did talk about that
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 12:07 PM
Jan 2023

but when he opened up the floor for questions, that's all reporters wanted to ask.

he also mentioned Jill was in the hospital. I didn't catch what her ailment was/is.

 

JohnSJ

(98,883 posts)
6. Thanks CatWomen. They found a couple of places with a basal carcinoma skin cancer, and had them
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 12:10 PM
Jan 2023

removed. It was reported in the press yesterday. That type of skin cancer is very common, and very treatable, so I would expect the prognosis to be excellent


Liberty Belle

(9,708 posts)
18. Basal cell carcinoma is slow growing and very treatable.
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 01:44 PM
Jan 2023

I had one that was misdiagnosed for nearly two years, and had a Mohs procedure (same as Jill Biden). It's stayed gone since then, probably 10-15 years ago or more.

Melanoma is the worst and most dangerous form of skin cancer.

Second worse is squamous cell carcinoma. I had one of those on my scalp, little more involved to remove it -- and it was my hairdresser who spotted it after she reopened from COVID lockdowns. She probably saved my life.

If you have to get skin cancer, basal cell is the least concerning, grows very slowly, and generally does not metastasize/spread elsewhere.

dweller

(28,665 posts)
7. She had
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 12:10 PM
Jan 2023

Cancerous lesions removed from her face
I didn’t know she was still in hospital


✌🏻

 

claudette

(5,455 posts)
8. I read that Jill
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 12:10 PM
Jan 2023

had a cancerous lesion removed but I didn't think it required hospitalization. Wonder what it is?

ShazzieB

(22,870 posts)
28. Or as I like to call him, Peter Douchey.
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 03:29 PM
Jan 2023

Never has a name cried out more clearly for punning!

Deuxcents

(27,679 posts)
2. Why do the press yell out questions instead of waiting to be called on?
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 12:00 PM
Jan 2023

It’s ridiculous n looks like a free for all circus

MichMan

(17,389 posts)
13. If the administration doesn't ask if there are any questions , that is their only chance.
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 12:29 PM
Jan 2023

getagrip_already

(17,802 posts)
16. joe did open it up for questions....
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 12:36 PM
Jan 2023

The traditional practice would be for the reporters to raise their hands and be acknowledged by the speaker. They would then get to ask their question.

Press demeaner started to break down with reagan and accelerated all the way through trump.

it is now just a zoo.

calimary

(90,755 posts)
19. As one who's been in those competitive scrums, I can try to explain it.
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 01:54 PM
Jan 2023

The key word is “competitive.”

Everybody wants to get their questions answered, in such a way that one of their questions makes the big headline on the front page or the lead story on the newscast.

A two-headed reason:
1) important question elicits a big story, unforgettable comment, power-jolting or pecking-order-shifting result; a big wrong is exposed or rectified; a new wisdom, explanation, or take on reality breaks through. The “get it and get it first” thing that generates headlines that grab anttention and a life of its own.
And 2) the reporter who asks that provocative or powerful question gains stature, rises above the pack, polishes his or her persona in ways that often elevate their positions or salaries or career advancement, or all three.

I’ve been in those situations. Backstage at the Oscars, the big winner arrives to make statements and take questions, and everybody in the press corps is out of their seats and crowding the platform, all of them with questions for THEIR publication or network or outlet. Everybody’s calling out for the celebrity’s attention and even trying to yell out their questions before even being formally recognized. You have to push hard to be heard.

I did that, too. With some success. I can get loud when I need to. That’s what I could do to make sure my question stood out, got heard, and hopefully earned a response. My supervisor who always came west to anchor the on-scene coverage (and was highly critical of everything) commented “your voice carries.” And it wasn’t a negative critique, which surprised the heck outta me! Well, for some reason, he was right, and it did (and still does). But hey, if you can make yourself heard above a loud and insistent pack of reporters, then so much the better.

MyOwnPeace

(17,609 posts)
21. Thanks, Cali - great explanation!
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 02:09 PM
Jan 2023

In looking back, one gains even more respect for the brutal way Jen Psaki handled Peter Doocy, essentially burying him under his own pile of stupidity - and every day he kept coming back for "More, Please!"

calimary

(90,755 posts)
26. Peter Doocy. Fox News. Maybe that's all we need to know.
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 02:57 PM
Jan 2023

We do have long-running evidence that Fox News is - um - shall we say BIASED??? They can always be counted on to accentuate the negative in all-things-liberal/Democrats/Biden while going the other way on all-things-conservative/Republican.

My experience taught me always to consider the source and whatever ulterior motivations and/or agendas might be at work in these cases. And never to just swallow it whole.

KS Toronado

(23,857 posts)
17. Big egos in the press?
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 12:58 PM
Jan 2023

Shame the White House doesn't have a rule "you yell--you get no answers" policy and if time is limited,
draw their name/number out of a hat/globe and that's all the questions today. That way no favorites.
However I think they like to call on FQX, to make him look foolish.

Traildogbob

(13,156 posts)
20. Did he
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 01:57 PM
Jan 2023

Declassify them With his mind, rant that they were his, scream presidential
Privilege, or Presidents can not be charged or investigated. Did he start bellowing about those witches the libs keep hunting for?

LymphocyteLover

(10,134 posts)
22. That is good to know but the problem is no matter how sanely he responds to this, the right
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 02:20 PM
Jan 2023

is going to be utterly stupid and hysterical and insufferable about the supposed double standard.

yardwork

(69,642 posts)
25. I hope his team is alert to dirty GOP tricks.
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 02:54 PM
Jan 2023

This is starting to remind me of what was done to the Clinton administration, and before that, Jimmy Carter.

The GOP has a long history of dirty tricks and ratfucking. And the dirtiest trickster of all is Roger Stone.

The Secret Service is not to be trusted. And there's a very long history of what that can mean, going back to Julius Caesar and before.

usaf-vet

(7,856 posts)
27. What I have always found confusing is the process by which an individual with clearance "aquires"...
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 03:03 PM
Jan 2023

..... classified documents? I would guess that a POTUS or VP wouldn't wander over to the national archives with their "library card" and check them out.

I again would guess that some staff member or aide with clearance would pick up and deliver the requested documents.

Given the busy schedule of the POTUS and VP, it would seem that someone with clearance would be assigned to "keep track" of those documents and have the ability to ask periodically if they were ready to be returned.

At the very least, the National Archive might send a reminder "that according to their records," said documents might need to be returned if they are no longer in use. Additionally, they would keep tracking records and KNOW what documents were missing and needed to be returned.

The confusion over TFG's held classified documents makes it sound like no one knows for sure what is missing.

BlueCheeseAgain

(1,983 posts)
29. There's no central repository for classified documents.
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 03:36 PM
Jan 2023

And I'm sure in the White House, they're up to their ears in the stuff. They probably handle them regularly. In fact, they probably often create them themselves.

Most likely what happened is that when packing things up, some classified stuff got mixed up with unclassified stuff, and has been sitting in a basement/closet for years. I would honestly think that happens all the time.

That's also likely why the government didn't make a big deal about Trump at first either. First, they asked nicely for the documents. Then, they issued a subpoena. Finally, they got a search warrant. Basically, only when it seemed Trump was willfully refusing to give the documents back did they take serious action.

Cha

(320,534 posts)
30. That should piss off the "media"..
Thu Jan 12, 2023, 05:21 PM
Jan 2023

TY for this, Cat.

He probably didn't give a clues how this all happened since it's an ongoing investigation, right?

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Biden just finished a pre...