Supreme Court Reportedly Eyeing 'Small Number of Suspects' in Roe v. Wade Leak

[Celerity]

https://www.thedailybeast.com/supreme-court-eyeing-small-number-of-suspects-in-roe-v-wade-leak-report



The hunt for the person who leaked a draft of the Supreme Court opinion that overturned Roe v. Wade is still dragging on, people familiar with the matter told The Wall Street Journal. However, investigators have narrowed the focus to “a small number of suspects including law clerks,” WSJ reported Friday.

All of the three dozen-or-so clerks who were working for the court’s nine justices last May, when the draft was leaked to Politico, have been ordered to sit for interviews and hand over their cellphones, prompting some to seek legal advice. The interviews have been short and superficial, WSJ reported, with blunt questions like, “Did you do it?”

The Supreme Court’s marshal, former lawyer Gail Curley, is leading the investigation but the court’s in-house police force are more versed in providing security than conducting complex investigations. Curley has reportedly sought assistance from outside government investigators but the source of the leak continues to evade them.

Read it at The Wall Street Journal

[UTUSN]

1. K&R

[Disaffected]

2. I wonder if

they are using polygraphs?

[Bev54]

3. Are they interviewing the Justices in the same way? And by that I mean one in particular.

[Rebl2]

5. They certainly should

Sure has taken a long time and no way I would hand my phone over to them

[Mr.Bill]

4. A small number?

Like nine? Or ten if you count Ginni.

[rubbersole]

6. Alito should just fess up.

After all, he's the king of the world. Just ask him.

[edhopper]

7. The call is coming

from inside the house!

[Phoenix61]

8. How about family members of justices? Say wives? nt

[FakeNoose]

9. (cough, cough) ... "Ginni Thomas" ... (cough, cough)

Who me? I didn't say anything.