General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublicans Vow To Cut Social Security: 'People Want To Work Longer'
https://crooksandliars.com/2023/01/republicans-wanting-cut-social-securityRepublicans Vow To Cut Social Security: 'People Want To Work Longer'
Who doesn't want to dig ditches until they are ninety years old?
By John Amato January 16, 2023
Georgia Republican Congressman Rick Allen said they are considering raising the age of Social Security because, in his words, "people want to work longer."
Social Security Works grabbed this video (at link) for the entire country to see.
Pete Callahan asked the Congressman about raising the age of retirement.
Allen thought that was an interesting question.
"That's on the table?" Callahan asked.
"Well, you know, if people want to work longer maybe you need to give them an incentive to do it," Allen replied.
"That's the way to solve every one of these problems by the way," he added.
snip//
Link to tweet
Deep State Witch
(10,460 posts)People CAN work longer than 65 if they want to. They don't want to. Hell, I didn't want to work anymore at 56!
Farmer-Rick
(10,212 posts)Why would anyone want to work longer than they have to? There are so many other things to do in life.
It's not like working in a capitalist corporate monopoly is a great life. They screw you over every chance they get. They are always on a power and control kick.
This BS sounds like the Pete Peterson foundation crap. They want to privatize your retirement funds and they hate that the government protects our almost $3 Trillion SocSec funds from corporate raiders.
The filthy rich really wants to get their hands on that almost $3 Trillion (trillion with a T) SocSec trust fund. That's why the GOP wants to end SocSec.
Justice
(7,188 posts)HuskyOffset
(890 posts)BlueWaveNeverEnd
(8,085 posts)forgotmylogin
(7,533 posts)In a congressional body that currently doesn't do a lot.
Collimator
(1,639 posts)When he says "people" he means other congresscritters like himself. And when he says "work" he means getting paid to sit around an historic building half the time and go around making alarmist statements to keep himself employed the other half of the time.
DBoon
(22,399 posts)What color is the sky on the republican planet?
Walleye
(31,062 posts)I doubt hes ever done any real work, if he did it was so long ago he cant remember, what a fucked up thing to say
Rural_Progressive
(1,107 posts)any manual labor for years. Wonder how long he'd last in any of the trades cause who doesn't want to be hanging drywall for a living in the mid 60s to 70s?
Walleye
(31,062 posts)BlueTsunami2018
(3,503 posts)These people are the absolute worst.
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
yardwork
(61,712 posts)He can work longer if he wants.
He can work longer if he wants, but unfortunately they do so in Congress a lot of the time😐.
sinkingfeeling
(51,474 posts)2/3 of 1% per month until age 70. I'd call that an incentive to work longer. I worked past my retirement age of 66.
thesquanderer
(11,993 posts)There's already a financial incentive to delay taking SS. If you like your work, by all means, do it... and collect more SS, when you're ready for it.
Beaverhausen
(24,472 posts)People do have the choice to work longer and delay their SS payments.
Farmer-Rick
(10,212 posts)I have to wait until I'm 66 and 6 months before I get my full retirement. So, the goal under Greenspan and Raygun was to move it to 67.....or does it get even later?
Beaverhausen
(24,472 posts)By year. It goes up a bit every year. I will likely need to work until Im 68 to be able to retire. Fortunately Im healthy. Turning 64 this year.
former9thward
(32,082 posts)Congress passed that law and Reagan signed it.
SouthernDem4ever
(6,617 posts)He could have vetoed it or sent it back for revision, but like his worthless cohorts, they only reason they retire is because they are tired of the food being served at Washington DC restaurants.
former9thward
(32,082 posts)Why would someone pick just one third of the process to blame?
SouthernDem4ever
(6,617 posts)not so they can all agree on everything.
homegirl
(1,434 posts)made Social Security benefits taxable income, and lowered corporate tax rate from 70% to 27% at the same time. Guess who benefits?
former9thward
(32,082 posts)They passed the laws which Reagan signed. A president can't make those changes by himself.
homegirl
(1,434 posts)a Republican dominated Congress?
former9thward
(32,082 posts)The Senate was controlled by Republicans for the first 6 years and then Democrats took over.
sinkingfeeling
(51,474 posts)2naSalit
(86,809 posts)Fuck those privileged assholes.
GP6971
(31,220 posts)It's a matter of choice or need whether one works past their SS retirement age.
dweller
(23,665 posts)Repugs and their policies ?
Not so much
Repugs have got to go
✌🏻
greatauntoftriplets
(175,752 posts)What a jerk.
70sEraVet
(3,516 posts)llmart
(15,555 posts)First they say "nobody wants to work any more". Then they say, "people want to work longer."
These GOP imbeciles can't even lie straight.
housecat
(3,121 posts)StClone
(11,688 posts)...and told vaccines are more dangerous than covid, a pizza parlor in DC is a front, smokes need to be lit up in the National Capitol, DeSantis is making Florida great again...and on and on.
IcyPeas
(21,910 posts)progressoid
(49,999 posts)She certainly didn't look like she wanted to be there.
bullwinkle428
(20,631 posts)Security is SIXTY-FUCKING-TWO??
IOW, the earliest age one can begin taking its benefits?
Response to babylonsister (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
phoenix75
(290 posts)The Repubs messing with Social Security and Medicare are committing political suicide. All we have to do is sit back and watch. So stock up on the popcorn 🍿
calimary
(81,514 posts)Itd be mighty nice NOT to have to put up with some of those assholes who only seem to want to hurt people who arent already in fine financial shape. They only seem to care about comforting the already-comfortable.
DickKessler
(364 posts)Good issue to seize on imo.
ThoughtCriminal
(14,049 posts)how about reducing or eliminating SS penalties for working after retirement ($1 in reduced benefit for each $2 earned above $20,240)?
Wouldn't that be a a better incentive to continue to work if one wanted too?
I bet that's not on Rick Allen's "table".
But what age do people want to retire? The average is 62, but for younger workers - the one's most impacted by a increase in retirement age, the target is lower: 60 for Gen X, 59 for Gen Y.
ProfessorGAC
(65,213 posts)...that when one hits full retirement age, the ticket to work is reinstated.
I retired at 62 & 2 months and had an earnings limit of 18 thousand something.
But, 50 months later I could now work more? That's nonsensical.
gab13by13
(21,412 posts)and it would take 20 minutes to get feeling back in my hand. I had arthritis in my hands from turning wrenches for 40 years.
Mad_Machine76
(24,438 posts)People can work until they drop for all I care, but most people, if anything, want to retire earlier so that they can actually have some "Golden Years" during which to enjoy the fruits of their labor. And that's not even mentioning people who have worked so long and hard that they are unable to keep up with their jobs due to sickness, injury, or disability.
poli-junkie
(1,007 posts)bullpucky?
DickKessler
(364 posts)dflprincess
(28,082 posts)Seventy arrives this year & I'll start the collecting my benefits then but I've decided to keep working.
My employer's health insurance is quite a bit cheaper than Medicare and covers a lot more than Medicare does & I really don't want to give it up.
Gore1FL
(21,152 posts)My heart would explode long before 70. I'm hoping it reaches 60.
More power to you. I am not built for it.
Algernon Moncrieff
(5,790 posts)He wanted to, as he is one of those people whose identity was his work. He did not have hobbies like hunting, fishing, camping/RVing that other people dream of in retirement. He's now very comfortably retired.
I had planned to work to 70 for the same reasons as you, but I may have to "retire" at 62 (or sooner) to go take care of the aforementioned dad. What I likely won't do is claim SS.
I'm not immune to math or the number of retiring late-stage boomers. So I would be willing to discuss a gradual increase in the age over several years if we also discuss a raise in the cap. The more serious discussion we need to have is about phased retirement (encouraging employers to allow workers to transition more slowly to full retirement with part-time or seasonal work schedules) and about encouraging retraining for "second act" employment -- especially for those who have done largely physical work and need to shift gears to less physically demanding work in their 40s and 50s.
Gore1FL
(21,152 posts)The republican narrative is getting more confusing each day.
Yup, the Republican messaging is all over the place because they have no plans beyond making their donors and themselves richer.
Cutting SS and Medicare will not fly with the vast majority of Americans.
But please Republicans, keep digging that hole!
LisaM
(27,840 posts)Many, many employers don't want to keep employees past a certain age (partly, I am sure) for salary considerations. My old employer would never admit it, but it became pretty clear at one point they were doing that. Or they'd offer early retirement 'incentives' (a fairly paltry percentage of the salary in a lump sum) and make it clear that people were expected to take it. Then they would hire younger people at lower salaries.
So it's not always possible to work that long.
Ohioboy
(3,246 posts)This guys making stuff up. Does anyone really believe this moron has had people coming up to him complaining that they want to work more?
patphil
(6,217 posts)Current age for full benefits is 67.
liberalla
(9,264 posts)If people want to keep working, let them!! It's that simple.
He's just making up shit, if you ask me. Typical repukelican.
Captain Zero
(6,827 posts)Wasn't enough incentive for me. I needed to get off my feet, and be done with long work hours, and be around to help my wife more with her disability.
The ONLY people I know working longer are in high paying jobs. And they are struggling some with the physical issues. But they will gain 7% per year in their Social Security benefits and add to their 401ks. But as we all know, they may work just long enough to die before or soon after they retire.
Joinfortmill
(14,468 posts)MarcA
(2,195 posts)Supposedly has a degree in "building construction", guess he thinks construction work isn't very physical, had a rant at a rethug Congressional meeting against LGBTQ legislation 'cause the bible is against it and those voting for it are going to "hell", and, of course, supported the Biden didn't win nonsense.
3825-87867
(855 posts)That's superb! Maybe we should start referring to all those from Billionaires down to those who are only wannabe "Plantation Owners."
patphil
(6,217 posts)My wife is going on 77 and works full time as a librarian, while receiving her full Social Security benefits.
Once she reached the age at which she was eligible for full benefits (66 in her case), she was consoled by the Social Security Administration to request her benefit, and told she could continue to work without any reduction in benefit. And she's been doing so for 11 years.
I think that age is now 67.
orangecrush
(19,624 posts)betsuni
(25,659 posts)DickKessler
(364 posts)He, Bannon, etc. were was savvy enough to know that he couldnt be perceived as a corporate elitist who was eager to cut Social Security and Medicare like Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan in 2012. That would be hitting a big chunk of the Republican base.
Its helpful for Dems to have instances of Republican politicians openly talk about their plutocrat goals. No it certainly wont win over all Republican voters, it wont win over most to our side but if even a small minority across different states and districts get disillusioned with the Right, regardless of the issuethat gives us an opportunity.
And remember: Republican policies are far less popular and there are fewer Republicans overall. They know thisotherwise they wouldnt be so committed to undermining and short-circuiting our democracy via voter suppression, the Supreme Court, January 6 and all the Trumpian Republicans cannot lose, and Democratic victories are illegitimate positions, and so forth.
Democracy is our ally.
betsuni
(25,659 posts)They vote for any Republican, "establishment" who want to cut social safety nets or fake populists who claim not to. Doesn't matter.
Grins
(7,234 posts)AllaN01Bear
(18,443 posts)Cha
(297,733 posts)ShazzieB
(16,541 posts)Oh, wait.
Murphyb849
(572 posts)Let them keep threatening the senior citizens which happened to be their largest voting block.
The ones they don't kill with COVID, guns or cigarettes.
RANDYWILDMAN
(2,676 posts)not later, we need more from social security, not less and we need better more affordable health care !!
Bristlecone
(10,135 posts)Martin Eden
(12,875 posts)Working Americans have paid for their retirement benefits with deductions from every paycheck our entire lives.
Republicans drive up budget deficits with huge tax cuts for the rich who keep getting richer, then they point to the national debt and blame it on "entitlements" -- the earned benefits owed to us.
What they're trying to do should be political suicide, but the GQP base is too brainwashed to comprehend what suckers they are.
Response to Martin Eden (Reply #62)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
KentuckyWoman
(6,697 posts)If geezer rich guys want to wait to retire more power to em. People who work hard enough to need a shower before dinner often struggle to make it to the finish line.
The freedom party should just let people choose
JCMach1
(27,574 posts)GoodRaisin
(8,930 posts)Had to go 8 months without income before SS kicked in at 62.
EndlessWire
(6,570 posts)DickKessler
(364 posts)This very directly affects their own voter base negatively.
No one wants to see their Social Security money stolen and given to plutocrats.
Emile
(22,950 posts)twodogsbarking
(9,823 posts)Got tired of stretching money while owner spent 3 months in Hawaii and
emailed me to tell the employees they were getting a 10% pay cut; except for the
one woman who he is afraid of.
Ziggysmom
(3,416 posts)Aristus
(66,467 posts)Jesus...
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,234 posts)Cuthbert Allgood
(4,965 posts)I'm a teacher who will be 57 when the next school year starts. I will have a full pension when I am 61/62. The only thing stopping me from retiring at that point will be the cost of health insurance until I qualify for Medicare.
This guy can fuck right off.
lees1975
(3,880 posts)scumbags. Wanna see a Democratic landslide? I think even Democrats in hugely gerrymandered districts could beat extremists like Matt Gaetz and MTG.
debm55
(25,453 posts)see myself working with little children until I was 75. It would be unfair to them not to have a more active teacher. Is this for those approaching 65? Or do they plan on cutting our SS benefits back too? Thank you.
RocRizzo55
(980 posts)Of bovine fecal matter. Most people would retire at 45 - 50.
They have people brainwashed, telling them that SS is going broke. All they have to do is to get rid of the cap, and it would be solvent for eternity.
SouthernDem4ever
(6,617 posts)I would work until I was 90. Unfortunately, most of us truly have to do physical work for a living. Your body can only last so long dumbass. (speaking to Rick Allen)
IbogaProject
(2,843 posts)Refuse your congressional pension until you're in your 70s.
wryter2000
(46,082 posts)Unless their employer has a policy that they must retire at a given age.
Social Security has no effect on that.
Evolve Dammit
(16,778 posts)Samrob
(4,298 posts)money want to work longer. Everyone who works a legitimate and labor job wants out as soon as possible for health reason if for no other reasons. It is really disgusting. Maybe they should extend the age for all white collar jobs and keep the current retirement age or reduce it for blue-collar and service jobs? Screw these greedy, rich MF's!
BidenRocks
(827 posts)It is OUR money.
Initech
(100,105 posts)God the GOP sucks.