General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOMG! Obama has an Anatomical Edge over Romney according to their Wives!
Durex China Obama Ad Suggests Obama Has Anatomical Edge Over Romney (PHOTO)
[url=http://postimage.org/][img]
[/img][/url]
[url=http://postimage.org/]online photo sharing[/url]
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/07/durex-china-obama-ad-romney-photo_n_2089379.html
MADem
(135,425 posts)But that is hilarious.
slutticus
(3,431 posts)...but i'm
codjh9
(2,781 posts)sheshe2
(96,095 posts)I was laughing so hard I could hardly (no pun intended) post it!
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)I mean, they're magic and all, but, you know, they're not miracle workers.
sheshe2
(96,095 posts)I am honored! Thank you sooooo very much for DU!
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)"The Skinner"
LOL!
I am a newbie....Skinner KR'ed my thread.....posted too.....wow......!
It's awesome!
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)plays on racist stereotypeing; but is funny as hell.
PD Turk
(1,289 posts)Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)redStateBlueHeart
(265 posts)Now there's OJ all over my computer screen
flor-de-jasmim
(2,266 posts)onecent
(6,096 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)That would be the one on top!
LOL!
MineralMan
(150,691 posts)I can't believe I was the first to get that in here.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)tarheelsunc
(2,117 posts)"The difference between Obama and Romney is..."
Surprised I knew that with my limited Chinese
sheshe2
(96,095 posts)Care Acutely
(1,370 posts)eridani
(51,907 posts)I'd be willing to bet that any quote from any foreign language on this board would get a response from someone with an approximately correct translation somewhere downthread.
Spock_is_Skeptical
(1,491 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)If there was a thread about the size of Michelle's butt, breasts or vagina, it would be swiftly locked.
Maybe I will post about how overly large Ann Romney's vagina is and see how it goes.
sheshe2
(96,095 posts)The Chinese text on the condom ad "The difference between Obama and Romney is
", which was posted to Chinese social network Weibo on Nov. 7. The Beijing Cream first reported on the ad's existence and The Huffington Post confirmed the text of the ad with its own translation.
I just reported an article...I thought it was funny.
You decide!
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)But I can't help but put on my anthropologist hat and see the differences with which we accept the mocking of male sexuality vs. the intolerance of discussing female body parts.
sheshe2
(96,095 posts)This was put out there as a funny post....Satire!
There was nothing funny about what the GOP was saying about females....about legitimate rape, about we are so easy to rape ,that we aren't smart enough to decide what is right for our bodies! Trans vaginal ultrasounds ...the repubs want to tell us what is right for us.....guess we are just to dumb to decide! We are women after all ....we never should have gotten the vote in the first place we need the men folk to tell us what to do!
This election was in part decided by WOMEN saying NO!
We spoke pretty loud and clear with a 19% gender gap!
We elected Elizabeth Warren here in MA!To take our country forward!
WE elected Women to the congress and senate to take us FORWARD!
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Mocking a womans genitals will get you banned.
Mocking a mans genitals gets laughs.
This is a double standard. Do you see it?
sheshe2
(96,095 posts)a story that i posted from the huffington post is not the same as congress trying to legislate laws on womens bodies! When was the last time you saw any laws being legislated against mens bodies..... please enlighten me!
When was your right to chose taken away frm you....I must have missed that!
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)we are discussing this site.
Do you understand that DU is not the US congress?
When was the last time you saw any laws being legislated against mens bodies..... please enlighten me!
Well there was the draft. . .
Also most prisoners (94% or so) are male. So those laws primarily affect men, and what they may do with their bodies (like moving about freely).
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)There is massive outrage.
The same thing does NOT happen if a man if referred to by a vulgar slang term for his genitals.
I see plenty of women saying things like He must be compensating for small genitalia or variations of that. Especially when referring to gun owners, or owners of large trucks, or a large something.
Imagine if a man said She must be compensating for having small breasts, or She must be compensating for having poor quality genitalia.
It is perfectly acceptable on DU to call a man fat, or flabby. Imagine if the same thing was said about a woman.
When men complain about misandry, were told there is no such thing.
When men complain about women hating men, were told that doesnt happen. Yet men are told all the time that men hate women.
When men complain about discrimination, were told we cant be discriminated against because were a member of the oppressor class. As if a poor working class man could still be the oppressor, while a college educated women is still the victim.
When men complain about some woman who has written an article where she fantasizes about killing lots of men, were told its satire and we should lighten up.
Or were given speech after speech about The Patriarchy, and how if were not part of the solution, were part of the problem. And how ALL hetero men are equally guilty if we dont do something.
Its even inferred that all men are either rapists or potential rapists.
Im sick and tired of men being called names, and being told to lighten up when we complain.
Men get bashed regularly here on DU. Id say its even a sport with some.
rDigital
(2,239 posts)lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)sheshe2
(96,095 posts)joshcryer
(62,536 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Any way you slice it, whether in the form of humor or as a serious message about men compensating for their penis size, it is acceptable to talk about men and their genital size and NOT acceptable to discuss women's.
Now you can call me a whiner or whatever personal attack you choose, but I am pointing out a real cultural double standard.
Deal with it.
sheshe2
(96,095 posts)There is a huge difference to the points you are trying to make and what congress has been pushing thru with their agenda for the past year!
Have you seen any agenda effecting your rights as a person. Are they trying to forge mandated invasive procedures to your body!
Have they once said that your life should be sacrificed for the life of your child!
The child that they will not support once born!
Have you!
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Everyone else is taking about what jokes are acceptable on DU.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)But I don't think it bears directly on the issue I am bringing up wrt the double standard.
I really do validate women's victory over the BS control the Repubs were trying to assert. Bravo for that. Seriously.
sheshe2
(96,095 posts)When was the last time congress decided to to make a law about your body!
I must have missed that legislation...fill me in!
Please I need to know!
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)So I will decline the rhetorical question.
Response to Bonobo (Reply #32)
seaglass This message was self-deleted by its author.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)If you want to educate others on men's feelings regarding this type of humor you should post in a more visible place than the Men's Group or within a thread. Perhaps an OP in GD or Meta.
Such a post would be hidden or mocked.
/what about teh menz!?!? Man up. Check your privileges.
//DU is not generally receptive to gender double standards that benefit women at the expense of men.
Response to joshcryer (Reply #30)
Warren DeMontague This message was self-deleted by its author.
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)It'd simply have to be funny.
Which Bonobo failed hard to do.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Do you believe we should embrace sexist double standards here?
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)I didn't rec the thread.
I didn't say I thought it was funny. (That joke is way over played.)
Who's the hypocrite?
Some people think it's funny. I don't care one way or another.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)joshcryer
(62,536 posts)4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)ha.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)What a bunch of mens rights nonsense.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)Sorry, a dick joke doesn't mean I'm being oppressed.
joshcryer
(62,536 posts)
When we've equalized the playing field we can work on "male sex organ shaming" which the MRAs complain about.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Specifically.
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)Men have enjoyed quite a bit more political power than women for most of human history. Even today.
Douchebags like Todd Akin are trying to tell women what they can and can't do with their own bodies. Employers pay women less than men for the same work. Women have a harder time getting many jobs than men do, they get told to submit and obey men by religious figures, etc. etc. etc.
No, I don't agree with it, I believe women should be accorded the same respect and rights as men, but that's how things are. We live in a world where women suffer from discrimination. Hopefully yesterday's election will help with this.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)are you a politician? Are you in the 1%?
If not, how does their having similar genitals benefit you personally?
Are you going to live longer because of it? Less likely to end up in jail? Did you have more money dedicated to providing education and health care to your gender?
Employers pay women less than men for the same work
A valid complaint if it were true.
Women have a harder time getting many jobs than men do
Citation?
they get told to submit and obey men by religious figures, etc. etc. etc.
So women can volunteer to go to a church that gives them a list of rules to voluntarily follow?
And this is different for men?
I believe women should be accorded the same respect and rights as men
What rights are they denied?
backscatter712
(26,357 posts)A valid complaint if it were true.
Ask Lilly Ledbetter about that...
Citation?
Here's but one example. But really, it's not hard to go to scholar.google.com and run a search on "gender discrimination"
http://www.uky.edu/Centers/iwin/RTOCT12/HooblerWomeninManagement.pdf
And this is different for men?
You ever see female priests in the Roman Catholic Church? I haven't, and in fact, nobody has, because it's not allowed. Pope Maladict still decrees that the priesthood be a boys-only club.
And how voluntary is going to a religious organization when you've been raised going to it since you were a baby, you were steeped in the culture, and their memes (including misogynistic memes) affect how you and everyone around were socialized? Sure you can leave, as long as you don't mind losing friends, family, much of your social life... Some people can do that (I have), many can't.
Are you really this obtuse? Crawl out of your man-cave and look around you. Gender bias is pervasive.
As for my personal specifics? Only raised in a religion where the canon holds men to be superior to women; went to schools where boys were steered to math, science, engineering, business, while girls were steered to home-ec; I got respected more in college earning my degrees and on the job working as a software engineer than women earning the same degrees and working the same jobs; I don't have right-wing religious fanatics in government telling me what I can and can't do with my testicles. etc. etc. etc.
sheshe2
(96,095 posts)That was well said!
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Ask Lilly Ledbetter about that...
I prefer to base my opinions on empirical studies: http://www.democraticunderground.com/11144984
No persistent industry-wide discrimination has been found against women in the workplace. Individual cases? Sure. But then there are cases where men are discriminated against.
You ever see female priests in the Roman Catholic Church? I haven't, and in fact, nobody has, because it's not allowed. Pope Maladict still decrees that the priesthood be a boys-only club.
So? What bearing does this have on non-members? You can choose to go and subject yourself to their arbitrary rules. Or not. They aren't running the country are they?
And how voluntary is going to a religious organization when you've been raised going to it since you were a baby, you were steeped in the culture, and their memes (including misogynistic memes) affect how you and everyone around were socialized? Sure you can leave, as long as you don't mind losing friends, family, much of your social life... Some people can do that (I have), many can't.
100% voluntary.
This isn't a theocracy.
Are you really this obtuse? Crawl out of your man-cave and look around you. Gender bias is pervasive.
Some things are so obvious that it's impossible to cite even one example.
Are women currently denied the right to vote? To a fair trial? To choose their own religion? To express themselves politically? To run for office? To posses arms for self-defense?
What specific rights are women currently denied in the US?
As for my personal specifics? Only raised in a religion where the canon holds men to be superior to women; went to schools where boys were steered to math, science, engineering, business, while girls were steered to home-ec; I got respected more in college earning my degrees and on the job working as a software engineer than women earning the same degrees and working the same jobs; I don't have right-wing religious fanatics in government telling me what I can and can't do with my testicles. etc. etc. etc.
Sorry about your personal upbringing. But we're talking about politics/rights/etc.
Currently we spend money to steer girls towards STEM courses and to do better in math and science.
There is no money being spent to cover the deficit boys face in language courses. Also girls have a significantly higher graduation rate than boys and are now going to college at a rate of 3:2.
Clearly boys are the ones being overly privileged there.
There are scholarships for women only. Are there comparable scholarships for men only?
And religious fanatics tell men what they can and can't do with their genitals all the time. Save it for marriage applies to both. Also they aren't so keen on homosexual men doing what they please with their genitals are they?
Take any other group. Any one you please other than men. This hypothetical group represents 95% of the prison population. About 95% of workplace fatalities. The majority of the homeless population. Members kill themselves at a rate 4 times that of non-members. They are the first ones to be pushed in to dangerous jobs or deemed disposable enough for foreign wars. For the same crimes they suffer disproportionately harsh sentences. Despite living shorter lives they have less money dedicated to their health care than non-members. They make up the vast majority of highschool dropouts, discipline cases, and the like. Despite attending college at far lower rates than their population would imply there are scholarships available only to non-members. Despite suffering many unique issues that are largely unaddressed any attempt to correct these issues is seen as unfair to non-members (despite non-members already absorbing vastly more funds to address their issues).
This is a privileged group?
Evoman
(8,040 posts)

Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Unfortunately, I am 100% sure it will be blocked and I don't know how many more hits I can take before my plug is pulled.
slutticus
(3,431 posts)..."does that mean Obama drives an SUV and Romney doesn't????"
Initech
(107,581 posts)Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)politicaljack78
(312 posts)and fell in the snow and laughed even harder! I guess we can all say Barack Obama delivered in a big way!
sheshe2
(96,095 posts)Welcome to DU!
politicaljack78
(312 posts)Thanks for the welcome and this awesome post.
sheshe2
(96,095 posts)We won and we are AWESOME!
politicaljack78
(312 posts)Where character, honesty, and integrity triumphed over distortion, shiftiness, and Romnesia, which we now know could be attributed to poor blood flow.
krawhitham
(5,056 posts)sheshe2
(96,095 posts)They were awesome!
eridani
(51,907 posts)But not very.
Whovian
(2,866 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)
nolabear
(43,850 posts)You've either heard the joke or you ain't.