Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Alexander Of Assyria

(7,839 posts)
Wed Feb 8, 2023, 05:05 PM Feb 2023

The Frenzy Over China's Spy Balloon is Dangerous and Unwarranted

Last edited Wed Feb 8, 2023, 06:28 PM - Edit history (1)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/02/06/china-balloon-war-hysteria-taiwan/

Max Boot, Washington Post, Columnist, National Security

“War with China can and should be avoided — but we make it more likely by assuming it’s inevitable or by giving vent to exaggerated fears about Chinese power. The kind of anti-Chinese paranoia we are now seeing reminds me of the early days of the Cold War. Back then, there was also a sense that the United States was losing a global struggle with the Communists and that World War III might be nigh. That was a dangerous, destructive mind-set that led to anti-Red witch hunts at home and to ill-fated, costly military interventions such as the one in Vietnam. It almost led, during the Cuban missile crisis, to nuclear Armageddon.
In reality, the Soviet Union was never as strong or as reckless as so many imagined — and neither is Communist China.”

………

Should remind everyone of the early days of the Cold War, so don’t be fooled again!

Forgot to add this…fired or not fired?



“The balloon-mania, after all, comes only a few days after Air Force Gen. Michael A. Minihan, head of Air Mobility Command, sent out a memo to his subordinates predicting war with China within two years: “I hope I am wrong,” he wrote. “My gut tells me we will fight in 2025.” Sounding like one of the unhinged generals in Stanley Kubrick’s Cold War satire “Dr. Strangelove,” he advised his airmen — who operate and maintain cargo aircraft — to “fire a clip into a 7-meter target” and “aim for the head.”

From Max Boot article in WAPO
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Frenzy Over China's Spy Balloon is Dangerous and Unwarranted (Original Post) Alexander Of Assyria Feb 2023 OP
I don't see how a so-called 'frenzy' can be interpreted from the incedent. sprinkleeninow Feb 2023 #1
Pentagon is showing us the bun but where's the beef? Alexander Of Assyria Feb 2023 #2
IMO the military didn't really want to make a thing out of this. Model35mech Feb 2023 #6
I read/watched much of the ballon wing-ding. sprinkleeninow Feb 2023 #7
In my remote location, i can feel incensed , annoyed Tetrachloride Feb 2023 #4
This is Opinion? pwb Feb 2023 #3
So you're finally admitting it's not a weather balloon any longer? NickB79 Feb 2023 #5
No. Show me the beef, Navy!!?? Alexander Of Assyria Feb 2023 #8
Frenzy? There's no frenzy. China needs to keep its balloons to itself. Coventina Feb 2023 #9
No one needs permission to be angry, social media actually demands it. Alexander Of Assyria Feb 2023 #10
Social media? DU is the closest I get to social media. Coventina Feb 2023 #11

sprinkleeninow

(20,249 posts)
1. I don't see how a so-called 'frenzy' can be interpreted from the incedent.
Wed Feb 8, 2023, 05:11 PM
Feb 2023
Unless he means what the republiqons did and are doing with it?🤔
 

Alexander Of Assyria

(7,839 posts)
2. Pentagon is showing us the bun but where's the beef?
Wed Feb 8, 2023, 05:14 PM
Feb 2023

You maybe missed the last week of 24/7 Ballon Week coverage?

Model35mech

(1,536 posts)
6. IMO the military didn't really want to make a thing out of this.
Wed Feb 8, 2023, 05:25 PM
Feb 2023

Which is why I think they dragged their feet in shooting it down.

It became an American political issue



Why wait? Well, signals intelligence is what that thing was after, and when you put on a military attack on a balloon you WILL generate signals. A balloon over our territory could be a source of news a satellite really isn't. We're overflown by them many times a day.

At the same time, until the pieces are recovered no one will be sure exactly how the power question was resolved for the instrument package Yes, there were solar panels present, but the Russians and through them the Chinese also have small radioisotope thermoelectric generators. The Russians used them a lot in the Balkans back in the 90'ds

The DOD wouldn't really want the news in the NYT to say due to a shootdown nuclear material was strewn across the landscape of the US, would we?

So it was splashed rather than crashed on the Great Plains

sprinkleeninow

(20,249 posts)
7. I read/watched much of the ballon wing-ding.
Wed Feb 8, 2023, 05:44 PM
Feb 2023
r u saying there should have been much more meaty substance forthcoming from the gov? I feel they handled it just right.

Tetrachloride

(7,846 posts)
4. In my remote location, i can feel incensed , annoyed
Wed Feb 8, 2023, 05:18 PM
Feb 2023

bordering on pissed off.

If i was in a frenzy, I wouldn’t be here.

Coventina

(27,120 posts)
9. Frenzy? There's no frenzy. China needs to keep its balloons to itself.
Wed Feb 8, 2023, 05:51 PM
Feb 2023

We are allowed to be angered by them floating balloons in our airspace.

It was in no way a "frenzy."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Frenzy Over China's S...