Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gab13by13

(32,321 posts)
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 05:56 PM Feb 2023

Anyone Hear What Katyal Just Said ON Deadline Whitehouse?

Neal Katyal just said that DOJ should have investigated the fake electors on Jan. 7, 2021. He went on to say that we can't keep relying on local and state officials to save our democracy, if the people behind the insurgency are not held accountable they will do it again.

Lots of discussion about how Trump's strategy of delay has worked for so long.

Neal Just read a post from Trump on his social media platform. Trump said thanks to the brave people of Georgia, total exoneration for me.

Just wish that more people had access to Deadline Whitehouse.

73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anyone Hear What Katyal Just Said ON Deadline Whitehouse? (Original Post) gab13by13 Feb 2023 OP
I heard Katyal say this last night - cilla4progress Feb 2023 #1
He's not foot dragging, imo. He never planned on doing anything. onecaliberal Feb 2023 #3
Yep Rebl2 Feb 2023 #11
sure looks that way. Over and over. Evolve Dammit Feb 2023 #40
There MOMFUDSKI Feb 2023 #54
I think all these retired experts are True Blue American Feb 2023 #10
Neal is NOT retired Cheezoholic Feb 2023 #16
He's arguing for democracy at the Supreme Court. So yeah. onecaliberal Feb 2023 #26
You exaggerate -- I read it was only $2465 an hour onenote Feb 2023 #53
I'm well aware of his resume n/t Cheezoholic Feb 2023 #68
That explains why he is on every show that will. Have him.:) True Blue American Feb 2023 #66
I will believe my lying eyes and ears. Sorry, but I watched that murdering POS commit crimes. onecaliberal Feb 2023 #71
Exactly. They love the fact that there is an audience that eats up whatever they shell out. onenote Feb 2023 #51
I wish the department of justice wasn't sleeping while hundreds of people are STILL trying to onecaliberal Feb 2023 #2
This doesn't seem to be referring to Katyal's statement. Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #7
I heard that, and it surprised me a bit because the DoJ was still controlled by Ocelot II Feb 2023 #4
+1 sheshe2 Feb 2023 #9
His point was that the fake electors gab13by13 Feb 2023 #12
I Think You Answered Your Own Question ProfessorGAC Feb 2023 #21
While TFG was still in office it is unlikely that such an investigation could have proceeded. Ocelot II Feb 2023 #23
TFG was still POTUS on Jan. 7, 2021 central scrutinizer Feb 2023 #27
You'd think Katyal would know better MagickMuffin Feb 2023 #14
Bingo! inthewind21 Feb 2023 #22
That was 2 years ago. Enough time to extract the sand? Evolve Dammit Feb 2023 #42
The trump people should have been let go as soon as Garland was confirmed and could do a review. onecaliberal Feb 2023 #43
Same thing every day-multiple times a day. Kingofalldems Feb 2023 #5
Trump being invincible got old years ago. Scrivener7 Feb 2023 #29
THIS ALL DAY LONG onecaliberal Feb 2023 #45
I don't understand Katyal Beastly Boy Feb 2023 #6
Neal has been getting increasingly and obviously frustrated Cheezoholic Feb 2023 #8
In regard to ducks in a row, gab13by13 Feb 2023 #13
Getting so turned off snowybirdie Feb 2023 #15
Discussion just had on why Garland passed on indicting individual one. gab13by13 Feb 2023 #17
There was an argument here Duppers Feb 2023 #32
And Bannon is free as a bird, podcasting his seditionist bullshit to millions for fun and profit. nt Evolve Dammit Feb 2023 #47
Terrible that Bannon Alice Kramden Feb 2023 #59
Fuck Bannon. I'm thinking you are OK with his desire to overthrow democracy Alice? Evolve Dammit Feb 2023 #60
Sorry if you were sincere in your post. Evolve Dammit Feb 2023 #61
I was Alice Kramden Feb 2023 #65
Truly sorry. Evolve Dammit Feb 2023 #70
Nothing to see here WA-03 Democrat Feb 2023 #33
why, when there's this breaking news, is someone grousing about the Mueller report? bigtree Feb 2023 #64
If it was on Deadline Whitehouse it must be true. fightforfreedom Feb 2023 #18
I certainly am aware that you can find numerous anonymous prosecutors. gab13by13 Feb 2023 #20
Now you are getting ridiculous. You know prosecutors on the news give opposing views. fightforfreedom Feb 2023 #25
I do not watch other cable news, gab13by13 Feb 2023 #30
Maybe you should expand where you get your news from. You may be putting yourself in a news bubble. fightforfreedom Feb 2023 #56
Maybe you should see if you can conduct a conversation without ad hominems. Scrivener7 Feb 2023 #62
Discussion now about McGonigal, gab13by13 Feb 2023 #19
I have said this before. fightforfreedom Feb 2023 #24
Be more specific, gab13by13 Feb 2023 #28
Good post. Nicely reasoned. brush Feb 2023 #34
Someones saying I defend Garland for not indicting Trump is nicely reasoned? fightforfreedom Feb 2023 #52
You have your opinion, I have mine. brush Feb 2023 #57
I do not defend Garland for not indicting Trump. That's crazy. fightforfreedom Feb 2023 #48
Your patience for Garland is off the charts WA-03 Democrat Feb 2023 #35
agreed Evolve Dammit Feb 2023 #49
Waiting for the investigations to end before I judge things is of the charts patience????? fightforfreedom Feb 2023 #55
Your criticisms of others are true for you as well WA-03 Democrat Feb 2023 #69
So Katayal thinks Bill Barr would've opened an investigation into Trump? Fiendish Thingy Feb 2023 #31
That is funny WA-03 Democrat Feb 2023 #36
Why say something silly? gab13by13 Feb 2023 #38
✔️ Basically it's Biden Bashing live love laugh Feb 2023 #44
Thank you! True Blue American Feb 2023 #67
Yep. That fucker will sleep well tonight. Autumn Feb 2023 #37
"total exoneration"??? Damn, I hate asshole's gaslighting so much LymphocyteLover Feb 2023 #39
I agree with Neal in principle but disagree on one small detail. soldierant Feb 2023 #41
They hoped you'd forgotten that. live love laugh Feb 2023 #46
He shouldn't be taken literally, gab13by13 Feb 2023 #50
Why don't you contact Biden and tell him he failed by picking Garland. fightforfreedom Feb 2023 #58
If trump and those who planned the coup are not held accountable, people will stop voting. onecaliberal Feb 2023 #72
love that this post elevates Trump's blabbering here like someone should care bigtree Feb 2023 #63
For those quibbling about Jan. 7, 2021 being before Biden's term began... Silent3 Feb 2023 #73

cilla4progress

(26,525 posts)
1. I heard Katyal say this last night -
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 05:59 PM
Feb 2023

Garland's foot-dragging is damaging

Glenn Kirschner, who I also highly respect, says the same thing.

I'm trying to sustain hope...

And what's with the exoneration bs? More verbal diarrhea?

True Blue American

(18,579 posts)
10. I think all these retired experts are
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 06:24 PM
Feb 2023

Impressed with hearing themselves. I have to wonder when they sleep. Keep in mind it is all opinions from ex who do not have t(e evidence Garland and Smith do. They are giving opinions, not facts!

onenote

(46,142 posts)
53. You exaggerate -- I read it was only $2465 an hour
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 07:43 PM
Feb 2023

for him to represent Johnson & Johnson in a civil suit where the company was being sued for selling talcum baby powder with carcinogens.

True Blue American

(18,579 posts)
66. That explains why he is on every show that will. Have him.:)
Fri Feb 17, 2023, 05:09 AM
Feb 2023

But none of them have the evidence Smith, Garland and the prosecutors, even the Grand jury have. It is all opinions.

I just heard the Republican field called,” NICCI AND BOOTSIE!”

 

onecaliberal

(36,594 posts)
71. I will believe my lying eyes and ears. Sorry, but I watched that murdering POS commit crimes.
Fri Feb 17, 2023, 04:24 PM
Feb 2023

We all did. I heard the phone call with with the GA SOS. Acting like we don't know for sure what he did is complete BS. If you had done any one of the thousand things trump did, you would be in prison right now. Or maybe you're a rich white man who isn't subject to the american legal system either.

onenote

(46,142 posts)
51. Exactly. They love the fact that there is an audience that eats up whatever they shell out.
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 07:40 PM
Feb 2023
 

onecaliberal

(36,594 posts)
2. I wish the department of justice wasn't sleeping while hundreds of people are STILL trying to
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 05:59 PM
Feb 2023

overthrow the government.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
7. This doesn't seem to be referring to Katyal's statement.
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 06:11 PM
Feb 2023

If this is the reference to the present, what is your evidence that DOJ is sleeping?

Ocelot II

(130,533 posts)
4. I heard that, and it surprised me a bit because the DoJ was still controlled by
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 06:02 PM
Feb 2023

the Trump administration on 1/6 and until 1/20 - and Garland wasn't confirmed as AG until March 11, which is the very soonest he could have ordered anything to be done. I don't know why Katyal thinks the DoJ would have acted while TFG was still in office, or that administratively it could have taken significant action until an AG was appointed. Maybe Garland didn't act as fast as he should have, but how many Trump holdovers were still working for DoJ and throwing sand in the gears when he took over in March of 2021?

gab13by13

(32,321 posts)
12. His point was that the fake electors
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 06:26 PM
Feb 2023

was serious enough to have been investigated early on. Of course DOJ should have investigated the fake electors on 1/7/2021 no matter who the AG was, is the entire department corrupted?

ProfessorGAC

(76,704 posts)
21. I Think You Answered Your Own Question
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 06:45 PM
Feb 2023

Your question at the end seems the most logical explanation to why it was not instantaneously investigated. They're not going to investigate crimes to which they were connected.
Combine that with the inertia of "tradition" when it comes to pursuing political crimes and we have corruption reinforced by indifference.

Ocelot II

(130,533 posts)
23. While TFG was still in office it is unlikely that such an investigation could have proceeded.
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 06:47 PM
Feb 2023

Barr had resigned on 12/23/2020 and was replaced by Jeffrey Rosen. To his credit, Rosen had threatened to resign if TFG appointed his stooge Clark as AG, and he did prosecute a number of the 1/6 insurrectionists before he left two weeks later, but the matter of the fake electors was too close to TFG himself. It is also a lot more factually complicated than prosecuting the dirtbags who invaded the Capitol. His replacement was an acting AG, Monty Wilkinson.

central scrutinizer

(12,654 posts)
27. TFG was still POTUS on Jan. 7, 2021
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 07:01 PM
Feb 2023

He had packed every department with toadies. And purposely gummed up the transition to Biden.

MagickMuffin

(18,318 posts)
14. You'd think Katyal would know better
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 06:30 PM
Feb 2023

Because that’s what I immediately thought, Biden nor Garland were part of the government.


Ah well if he tweeted this at least we could correct him.


 

onecaliberal

(36,594 posts)
43. The trump people should have been let go as soon as Garland was confirmed and could do a review.
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 07:32 PM
Feb 2023

There is zero excuse for why any of these people are still serving in the Biden admin. They will make it easier for the next coup attempt coming in 2024.

Kingofalldems

(40,278 posts)
5. Same thing every day-multiple times a day.
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 06:05 PM
Feb 2023

These 'Trump is invincible' posts got old years ago.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
6. I don't understand Katyal
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 06:07 PM
Feb 2023

Choosing elector is delegated by the Constitution to state governments. Wouldn't federal interference in states' affairs require, at the very least, that the states request assistance from DOJ?

Cheezoholic

(3,719 posts)
8. Neal has been getting increasingly and obviously frustrated
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 06:14 PM
Feb 2023

over the last few weeks I've noticed. There has been a big change in his demeanor from the optimism he had at the beginning of the year when Willis was trying to keep the GJ report from being released and the charges are imminent statement. I think he really believed that something would've come out of GA by now and I've heard him quoted as he expects something from DOJ by April.

I value his opinion a lot as via his experience and understanding of the upper echelon of the judicial system he knows how long this shit takes and how important it is to have your ducks in a row before dropping the hammer. IMO the info he imparts on what is going on in these investigations is a bell weather I put a lot of weight on. While I still think justice is coming, his overall demeanor lately tends to makes one nervous.

gab13by13

(32,321 posts)
13. In regard to ducks in a row,
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 06:28 PM
Feb 2023

Katyal (not today) also said you almost have to try to lose a case against Trump.

snowybirdie

(6,687 posts)
15. Getting so turned off
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 06:36 PM
Feb 2023

by the same experts calling for the same things month after month. While the experts on MSNBC are smart and well meaning, they are getting very repetitive and tiring. Sick of all the talk about what might or should happen. I guess I'm just frustrated watching cable news. Need to take another hobby.

gab13by13

(32,321 posts)
17. Discussion just had on why Garland passed on indicting individual one.
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 06:39 PM
Feb 2023

He had 6 months to indict before the statute of limitations expired. Even wait and see'er Barbara McQuade had no explanation as to why Garland passed. Her only theory was that Garland wanted to charge something bigger, in other words, it was a political decision.

Duppers

(28,469 posts)
32. There was an argument here
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 07:18 PM
Feb 2023

Merrick Garland even dragged his feet on prosecuting Steve Bannon for defying a Congressional subpoena.

He was the wrong man for the job.

Evolve Dammit

(21,777 posts)
47. And Bannon is free as a bird, podcasting his seditionist bullshit to millions for fun and profit. nt
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 07:37 PM
Feb 2023

bigtree

(94,261 posts)
64. why, when there's this breaking news, is someone grousing about the Mueller report?
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 09:18 PM
Feb 2023

...if someone wanted to sow the seeds of discouragement among Trump opponents, they couldn't do much better than these supposed allies in this fight against him.

This falderal about Mueller and individual one has nothing to do with today's GJ report release, and everything with this need some have demonstrated to bash Garland at every point where he makes progress.

 

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)
18. If it was on Deadline Whitehouse it must be true.
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 06:39 PM
Feb 2023
You very well know I could find other respected prosecutors who have said the opposite of Katyal on many of his opinions. You know that's true. For many months we have watched prosecutors give opposing views on the news. I watch deadline. I have watched it happen.

Katyal is frustrated like everyone else. Katyal is offering educated guesses, opinions, like everyone else. Just because he believes something doesn't make it so.

Katyal saying the DOJ should have started investigating the fake electors on Jan 7th is out of character for him. He is usually more measured in his statements. That's a little over the top for him.

gab13by13

(32,321 posts)
30. I do not watch other cable news,
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 07:13 PM
Feb 2023

Today Nicolle didn't talk about balloons, didn't talk about Nikki Haley, didn't talk about Hunter Biden. I will listen to Stephanie Miller and Thom Hartmann.

 

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)
56. Maybe you should expand where you get your news from. You may be putting yourself in a news bubble.
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 07:56 PM
Feb 2023

That would explain things.

Scrivener7

(59,522 posts)
62. Maybe you should see if you can conduct a conversation without ad hominems.
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 09:02 PM
Feb 2023

I won't hold my breath.

 

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)
24. I have said this before.
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 06:47 PM
Feb 2023

You attack Garland/ DOJ more than you attack Trump. That is the truth. Nothing personnel, I am simply letting you know you constantly attack Garland. You even attack Garland when people inform you that you are incorrect about what you are attacking Garland for.

People can post what they want. People can complain about Garland. Your attacks on Garland are off the charts.

gab13by13

(32,321 posts)
28. Be more specific,
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 07:10 PM
Feb 2023

Garland is an honest, reputable man who would have made a fine SC justice.

I attack what Garland does or doesn't do eg: I want you to find one of your anonymous prosecutors and explain why Garland chose not to indict an unindicted co-conspirator, individual one? I criticize Garland for not indicting Trump while you defend Garland for not indicting Trump and I am the Trump supporter? Give me a break. I criticize Garland for taking too long to investigate Trump, you defend him.

 

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)
52. Someones saying I defend Garland for not indicting Trump is nicely reasoned?
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 07:41 PM
Feb 2023

It's nicely crazy.

 

brush

(61,033 posts)
57. You have your opinion, I have mine.
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 07:59 PM
Feb 2023

Garland could've indicted trump on the MAL docs case months ago as it's obviously obstruction of justice. There's the unindicted co-conspirator/Michael Cohen case that's also low hanging fruit. Indicting trump on either doesn't preclude him from charging trump later on any of a myriad of other apparent crimes, including the fake electors.

 

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)
48. I do not defend Garland for not indicting Trump. That's crazy.
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 07:38 PM
Feb 2023

I do not defend Garland for taking too long. I have said Garland has been in office for less than two years. I have said this is the largest investigation in our history. An investigation less than two years years old does not prove Garland is taking too long. I always point out nobody knows why Garland has done things the way he has done them. Only he can explain it. We don't hear his side of the story on all the things he is being accused of. There may be very good reasons why he has done things a certain way people don't agree with. We may learn he made mistakes. nobody knows yet. That's how I have been defending Garland.

I did not say you are a Trump supporter. I said you attack Garland more then you attack Trump, which is true in my opinion.

WA-03 Democrat

(3,355 posts)
35. Your patience for Garland is off the charts
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 07:23 PM
Feb 2023

Seriously, consider the fact that maybe nothing will be done is the plan along - like just running out the clock simple. I don't know the reason but the direction of the wind is Trump and his minions get off Rick Scott like free. Extend the SOL or STFU.

There is no equal justice in our country.

Face it and fight to fix it is my objective.

 

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)
55. Waiting for the investigations to end before I judge things is of the charts patience?????
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 07:53 PM
Feb 2023

All the evidence suggests the investigations are closer to the end than the beginning. They are all moving full steam ahead. Indictments are coming in Georgia and I am supposed to give up. Live a life of doom and gloom, A life of giving up all hope. A life complaining about every dam thing. A life blaming people for things that may or may not be true. No thanks, I will remain patient and hopeful.

WA-03 Democrat

(3,355 posts)
69. Your criticisms of others are true for you as well
Fri Feb 17, 2023, 10:23 AM
Feb 2023

You have no insider knowledge of any of these cases. To me - it’s full steam ahead to no where. It’s legal theater. Nothing will happen.

Trump kill the law by raping the DOJ and installing his minions. President Biden will not hack the justice department to reset it to before Bill Barr. DOJ and FBI have always been repuke run.

Name the time that Justice has been served with Trump?

I am sure equal justice does not exist.
This country was founded on the rule of law and we clear have “rich person” and “poor person” justice system. Also a clear division by race.

Trump is recorded on call with the GA SOS asking for the exact number of votes he needs 2 years ago. Trump signs the check and pays Stormy. Trump has 5 pallets of top secret documents at his pool club while the DOJ begs him to return them for a year. Trump is recorded on live tv trying to over throw the government. These are just a few samplings of his wrong doing. He’ll never pay a price. Be hopeful but not blind. Our system had already failed and is failing us. I want reform and accountability.

Fiendish Thingy

(23,236 posts)
31. So Katayal thinks Bill Barr would've opened an investigation into Trump?
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 07:15 PM
Feb 2023

Katayal loses credibility every time he opens his mouth- if he keeps it up, he will soon lower himself to the level of human clickbait Michael Cohen.

gab13by13

(32,321 posts)
38. Why say something silly?
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 07:26 PM
Feb 2023

Katyal never said that. Katyal's point was clear to me, the fake elector scheme was so serious that it should have been investigated as soon as possible.

As far as I am concerned, DOJ should not have had to wait for a criminal referral from Michigan. Using my noggin, when the Michigan SOS sent a referral about her fake electors that's a pretty good tell that DOJ was not involved.

Not just Katyal, when Adam Schiff asks the question, why is Fani Willis so far ahead of DOJ, is he just attacking Merrick Garland or is he worried that people need to be held accountable to stop the ongoing insurrection?

True Blue American

(18,579 posts)
67. Thank you!
Fri Feb 17, 2023, 05:15 AM
Feb 2023

I turn off Cohen when he comes on. He knew he was breaking laws for Trump. Now he is angry because he went to jail. Trump is sitting in Florida. The flunkies usually pay.

soldierant

(9,354 posts)
41. I agree with Neal in principle but disagree on one small detail.
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 07:31 PM
Feb 2023

On January7, Trump** was still President. and I shudder to think how much evidence they might have destroyed before anyone could stop them.

I would have said Jnuary 21 at the earliest.

gab13by13

(32,321 posts)
50. He shouldn't be taken literally,
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 07:40 PM
Feb 2023

His point was that the fake elector scheme was so serious that it should have been investigated by DOJ way before it was, DOJ even waited for a criminal referral from Michigan.

It is harder to gather evidence to convict the longer DOJ waits to investigate.

Look what we found out from Cassidy Hutchinson (the J6 committee discovered it) Trump was providing lawyers for the witnesses and coaching them to say they don't remember. The longer DOJ waits the more time the crooks have to stick to a story, memories fade, data is lost. What do I know? We can always GOTV.

 

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)
58. Why don't you contact Biden and tell him he failed by picking Garland.
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 08:02 PM
Feb 2023

Let me know what Biden says to you.

 

onecaliberal

(36,594 posts)
72. If trump and those who planned the coup are not held accountable, people will stop voting.
Fri Feb 17, 2023, 04:31 PM
Feb 2023

You can't expect anyone to take the process seriously when the law is only for the poor and politically powerless. If you broke the fucking law, you should go to jail. PERIOD.

bigtree

(94,261 posts)
63. love that this post elevates Trump's blabbering here like someone should care
Thu Feb 16, 2023, 09:12 PM
Feb 2023

...flailing aroung Trump's desperate lies doesn't make your case against Merrick Garland's DOJ.

I don't know why anyone thinks it does, or ffs why anyone would try and hit DUers over the head with this misinformation from Trump.

As for Katyal, he doesn't know shit about what DOJ was investigating or who they were investigating. He just doesn't have access to that information.

The really shitty thing he did here was substitute the actual DOJ investigation with the fantasy one in his head.

 

Silent3

(15,909 posts)
73. For those quibbling about Jan. 7, 2021 being before Biden's term began...
Fri Feb 17, 2023, 04:31 PM
Feb 2023

...Katyal's point still holds about the delay being way, way too long.

If Barr and Trump's corruption of the DoJ prevented an investigation of fake electors as soon as 1/7/2021, why not 2/7/2021 or 3/7/2021?

Katyal is not in the slightest bit ignorant about how quickly a willing and able DoJ can respond when motivated to do so.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Anyone Hear What Katyal J...