Am I mistaken with what was released today by the Georgia Judge?

[brettdale]

Does it 100% mean that Fanni Willis wont indict Trump?

[hlthe2b]

1. No. It doesn't mean that at all. Where did you read that? Truth Social from Trump himself?

[Wicked Blue]

2. Not sure.

Judges don't indict.

Grand Juries hand up indictments.

[PJMcK]

3. You been listening to Trump?!

The release doesn’t really tell us much. Ms Willis is holding her cards close. We’ll see what happens.

In any event, this report is not good news for Trump.

[inthewind21]

4. Or

Reading this very site. There are hair on fire threads right now about the same thing.

[Ocelot II]

6. It doesn't mean anything of the kind.

All it means is so far that some GJ witnesses might have lied and that the GJ concluded there was no election fraud. We don't know anything else, and neither does anyone other than Willis' office and the judge. Ari Melber seems to be talking out his ass.

[Fiendish Thingy]

7. You're mistaken.

Don’t know how you came to that conclusion, unless you’re only reading Trump tweets.

[Chainfire]

8. I read the documents and all I got from it was that there was a suggestion to go after

some of the, unnamed, witnesses for perjury. I don't see what purpose the release served. Of course, since it did not say, "We are coming for Trump" Trump plays it as a great victory.

The release was just a nothing burger.

[onenote]

9. it doesn't tell us one way or the other.

And the folks who have claimed for months that they know what Wiliis can and will do have been shooting smoke out their asses and continue to do so.

[Kingofalldems]

10. Poor try.