General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIt Is Journalism's Sacred Duty To Endanger The Lives Of As Many Trans People As Possible
https://www.theonion.com/it-is-journalism-s-sacred-duty-to-endanger-the-lives-of-1850126997Quentin is a 14-year-old assigned female at birth who now identifies as male against the wishes of his parents. His transition was supported by one of his unmarried teachers, who is not a virgin. He stole his parents car and drove to the hospital, where a doctor immediately began performing top surgery on him. Afterward, driving home drunk from the hospital, Quentin became suicidally depressed, and he wonders now, homeless and ridden with gonorrhea, if transitioning was a mistake.
We just made Quentin up, and thats okay. It doesnt mean stories like his arent potentially happening everywhere, constantly. Good journalism is about finding those stories, even when they dont exist. Its about asking the tough questions and ignoring the answers you dont like, then offering misleading evidence in service of preordained editorial conclusions. In our case, endangering trans people is the lodestar that shapes our coverage. Frankly, if our work isnt putting trans people further at risk of trauma and violence, we consider it a failure.
We stand behind our recent obsessed-seeming torrent of articles and essays on trans people, which we believe faithfully depicts their lived experiences as weird and gross. We remain dedicated to finding the angles that best frame the basic rights of the gender-nonconforming as up for debate, and we will use these same angles over and over again in hopes that this repetition makes them suffer. As journalists, it is our obligation to entertain any and all pseudoscience that gives bigotry an intellectual veneer. We must be diligent in laundering our vitriol through the posture of journalistic inquiry, and we must be allowed to fixate on the genitals.
The Onion writes what the NYT should have.
moniss
(9,150 posts)a disgrace.
Initech
(109,271 posts)Hate sells, and the Murdochs have the most profitable business in that industry. NYT is just trying to emulate what sells right now. And that is a disgrace.
ProfessorPlum
(11,461 posts)its trans coverage has been abysmal, as if (as stated above) the rights of trans people are up for debate. Their readership spreads that anti-trans bias towards a much bigger and different audience than Faux.
vercetti2021
(10,481 posts)Its more fun to demonize us for the possibility of a genocide.
ProfessorPlum
(11,461 posts)our friends in the trans community need protection and positive support. Not the demonization that conservatives and the NYT are dishing out.
LetMyPeopleVote
(182,093 posts)
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.