Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ificandream

(9,387 posts)
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 03:30 PM Feb 2023

Robert Costa reports that lawyers are looking to stop indictments based on forewoman interview

News: CBS News has learned that lawyers close to several GOP witnesses in Fulton Co. investigation are preparing to move to quash any possible indictments by DA based on the public statements by the forewoman of the special grand jury, per two people familiar with the discussions



17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Scrivener7

(51,014 posts)
1. I haven't been watching her interviews, prefering to get the gist of them from
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 03:33 PM
Feb 2023

posts here.

Has she said anything that would make this a legitimate effort? Anything that would warrant quashing indictments?

It sounds like she's an ass, but how does that jeopardize indictments?

ificandream

(9,387 posts)
2. She's been very general in her comments.
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 03:36 PM
Feb 2023

If the lawyers are using her interview as an excuse it must mean they know their client is guilty, ya thnk?

Response to Scrivener7 (Reply #3)

GoCubsGo

(32,093 posts)
5. They were going to try that regardless.
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 03:46 PM
Feb 2023

I have heard interviews of multiple lawyers saying that they will fail in their efforts, even in light of this recent happening. The jury foreman didn't cross any lines (although, she came a kind of close), give up anything, or break any laws. They don't have a case to quash any indictments. The case will still be brought before a grand jury soon. If they can prove their clients are innocent, they can prove it there.

former9thward

(32,082 posts)
17. No, they can't "prove it there"
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 04:52 PM
Feb 2023

A grand jury hears one side and one side only -- the prosecution. They do not hear anything from the defense or any defense evidence.

nolabear

(41,991 posts)
11. Well of course they are.
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 04:04 PM
Feb 2023

Throw it at the wall. Heck, I don’t blame them. I also expect them to fail miserably.

Takket

(21,626 posts)
16. they wouldn't be doing their jobs if they didn't try..........
Wed Feb 22, 2023, 04:51 PM
Feb 2023

that being said............

it is a hopeless maneuver

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Robert Costa reports that...