RW: Experimental software in Ohio won it for Obama

[cthulu2016]

This site explains how Ohio was stolen.

Some early exit polls told a different story than the actual vote, proving fraud. (The fact that early exit polling changes in light of better evidence subsequently is ignored.)

Polling agreeing with the outcome actually proves fraud. Corrupt pollsters matched their Ohio polls to the fraudulent totals they knew were coming, creating cover for the fraud.

Anecdotal evidence of turnout is preferred to actual turnout because it supports the fraud argument.

It was reported that shortly before the election, an "experimental software patch" was applied to vote tabulation machines in OH. This was done illegally as it had not been officially reviewed by anyone or tested prior to use.

How hard would it be to apply a software patch designed to automatically return a D+8 result? Incredibly easy. Is it also a coincidence that the most far left pollsters were predicting a D+8 electorate for OH despite evidence to the contrary? We call that "creating cover".

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message2043301/pg1

[codjh9]

1. Next it's going to be the Tooth Fairy who stole the election for us

[bluestateguy]

2. This election seems so much like 2004 in reverse

Everything about it seems like a Twilight Zone reversal of 2004.

Oh well. At least this time we are on the winning team!

[LisaL]

3. Software was installed under the supervision of republican SOS Husted.

You'd have to be delusional to think Husted would use that software to help Obama.

[gollygee]

4. Exactly what I was thinking

They think Husted stole the election for Obama? I mean really.

[LisaL]

8. I don't think SOS Husted ever made a decision that would benefit democrats.

So if he was going to steal it for anyone using his experimental software, it sure as hell wouldn't be Obama.

[DonViejo]

5. The SoS defended it's use in Federal Court, too...

and won!

[tblue]

10. Thank you.

False equivalency even from Dems now?

[bluestate10]

6. Those people have white nostrils and the whiteness is not from flour.

What an insane fucking analysis. How can any one take a loser like that seriously?

[Zambero]

7. The software authorized by Ohio's GOP Sec of State?

Wow, a Republican official that fixed the election for Obama, who would have thunk it? But mathematically speaking, Romney's carrying Ohio would still have left him far short of 270 electoral votes. Back the conspiracy theory drawing board!

[tblue]

9. Sounds like they speak from experience.

I don't care what looks silly. Let's take a look inside those e-voting machines and make the entire process as transparent as possible. It's not that hard and, again, it doesn't matter who thinks it looks silly. Who made thst the standard anyway?

[cui bono]

11. I support this theory.

Don't believe a word of it but I support it since if both sides are complaining about voting machines maybe we can get rid of them.