General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFox News Audience Abandons Ship After Obama Wins
Fox News Audience Abandons Ship After Obama Wins
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/08/1159185/-Fox-News-Audience-Abandons-Ship-After-Obama-Wins
codjh9
(2,781 posts)AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)actually allowed the average Fox News Viewer the opportunity to grow some new brain cells? Medical Study needed!
codjh9
(2,781 posts)but we can hope!
PA Democrat
(13,225 posts)a) colossal LIARS
b) grossly incompetent
C) both
defacto7
(13,485 posts)and left permanently.
not likely...
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Arkansas Granny
(31,523 posts)on where to dig the bunkers.
ChangeUp106
(549 posts)What would FOX's ratings be if it wasn't for us liberals tuning in to see the meltdown?
ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,029 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)They brought it on themselves.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Barack_America
(28,876 posts)JRLeft
(7,010 posts)Raine
(30,540 posts)standingtall
(2,786 posts)I turned to faux news the minute msnbc called it for Obama, because I wanted to see the reaction of their pundits, and Karl Rove's epic meltdown was awesome.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)diane in sf
(3,916 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)who are having trouble absorbing the Romney loss. My son's boss reads 4 newspapers a day, including the Wall Street Journal but not the NY Times. He is not a Faux News fan but does watch Kudlow on CNBC.... When he arrived at the office yesterday he was enraged...and stayed that way all day. He's a pro-Choice, gun-Hating Republican... So why, you ask, is he a Republican? Well, he's in his late 60s so he dates back to the days when Republicans were rational and the GOP was the party of ideas for one thing. But, and I think this is a big but, as the Democrats looked to expand their tent after the loss of the southern Democratic voting block, they began to forget about the white working class and allowed themselves to be branded as the welfare party, the minority party etc. He has said, many times, he is willing to pay more in taxes, but he'll be damned if he'll pay more to just expand the welfare rolls. This is a messaging failure even worse than the one about Obamacare.
Amonester
(11,541 posts)they are actually paying most of their taxes to expand the corporate welfare rolls much more (by gazillion more) than the poorer welfare rolls since the Republicans adopted their own southern strategies, which we're all stuck with since 1994 (and mostly during their Cheney/Bush pResidency...).
I guess we're not getting the truth out loud enough for these guys to hear it?
We don't own any mainstream media outlet, see? They do.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)than that. Besides, if 'we' were actually doing things and proposing legislation that would be broadly appealing even the MSM would have to report on it.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)I've been tuning in regularly since the election to enjoy the whining, crying, rending of garments, and gnashing of teeth.
Stinky The Clown
(67,816 posts)The people who tuned out are the low information morons. They knew there was an election. They voted for one of the two candidates. They watched the returns. They tuned out and went back to regular teevee.
Indykatie
(3,697 posts)TalkingDog
(9,001 posts)Which were in the weekly TV schedule.
I don't know what that might mean, but that might account for some of it.
mick063
(2,424 posts)"Ben Gazzi" to death.
Just how long can you whip folks into a fever pitch?
The answer is just long enough to create a negative talking point for the election. As it is, the "story" lasted about five news cycles too long. After stinging political defeat, I doubt the viewers are in the mood to watch a dead horse get beaten 24/7.
They need to come up with something else before folks abondon them in droves.
TheKentuckian
(25,029 posts)They have better production values.
ChachaCha
(22 posts)It can't happen to a more deserving bunch of people.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)yakking, few numbers and analysis.
I made fun of John King - think he sux as a moderator or political analyst....but the guy IS THE MAN, when it comes to knowing precincts and voting patterns.
Londoncalling
(66 posts)Even Romney believe them...
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Romney and Ryan both seemed to be inside the Fox bubble, saying things they heard on Fox and stepping in it as a result! Were Akin and Mourdock influenced by Fox? Faux-reality media has inherent dangers.
Londoncalling
(66 posts)could have been so confident of winning that he only wrote a victory speech is if
he watched nothing but Fox News and listened to nobody else but Karl Rove
and those in that bubble. Karl Rove thought it was sown up too.He got caught too.
Romney must have thought he had a chance as the kept campaigning on election day, somebody told
him he could win, when it was clear he could not. That was more humilating that losing, nobody told him
he would lose, and lose by a landslide too.
I watched the election coverage on the BBC, which had graphics and it showed us
that even with a recount if Romney won Ohio, he could not win the election because
Obama had won the other states, he was going to win Virginia, Nevada and Florida by then.
TeamPooka
(24,238 posts)lindysalsagal
(20,714 posts)I know faux lies, but I fear they'll all be back lapping it up the next day.
Renew Deal
(81,866 posts)Numbers are not great for MSNBC but I'll take them.