General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJoe Biden: My Plan to Extend Medicare for Another Generation
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/07/opinion/joe-biden-medicare.htmlhttps://archive.is/gy7Rx

By Joseph R. Biden Jr.
Mr. Biden is the president of the United States.
Millions of Americans work their whole life, paying into Medicare with every working day starting with their first job, even as teenagers. Medicare is more than a government program. Its the rock-solid guarantee that Americans have counted on to be there for them when they retire. For decades, Ive listened to my Republican friends claim that the only way to be serious about preserving Medicare is to cut benefits, including by making it a voucher program worth less and less every year. Some have threatened our economy unless I agree to benefit cuts. Only in Washington can people claim that they are saving something by destroying it.
The budget I am releasing this week will make the Medicare trust fund solvent beyond 2050 without cutting a penny in benefits. In fact, we can get better value, making sure Americans receive better care for the money they pay into Medicare. The two biggest health reform bills since the creation of Medicare, both of which will save Medicare hundreds of billions over the decades to come, were signed by President Barack Obama and me.
The Affordable Care Act embraced smart reforms to make our health care system more efficient while improving Medicare coverage for seniors. The Inflation Reduction Act ended the absurd ban on Medicare negotiating lower drug prices, required drug companies to pay rebates to Medicare if they increase prices faster than inflation and capped seniors total prescription drug costs saving seniors up to thousands of dollars a year. These negotiations, combined with the laws rebates for excessive price hikes, will reduce the deficit by $159 billion.
We have seen a significant slowdown in the growth of health care spending since the Affordable Care Act was passed. In the decade after the A.C.A., Medicare actually spent about $1 trillion less than the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projected before the A.C.A. reforms were in place. In 2009, before the A.C.A., the Medicare trustees projected that Medicares trust fund would be exhausted in 2017; their latest projection is 2028. But we should do better than that and extend Medicares solvency beyond 2050.
snip
mobeau69
(12,374 posts)Response to mobeau69 (Reply #1)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Happy Hoosier
(9,535 posts)and I fully support that. I doubt he will because of his pledge to not raise taxes on anyone making under $400,000, but it absolutely makes sense.
W_HAMILTON
(10,333 posts)There is no "cap" to raise here.
All covered wages are subject to the Medicare tax, regardless of how much money a person is making.
mobeau69
(12,374 posts)CousinIT
(12,541 posts)And the SS cap needs to be raised, too.
markodochartaigh
(5,545 posts)The younger people have less medical needs and also the savings in administration and insurance costs will save hundreds of millions. Also allow doctors to pay off their med school debt directly by seeing Medicare/Medicaid patients.
Wounded Bear
(64,324 posts)Like me a few years back. I had the VA as a backstop and the additions to Medicaid from the ACA weren't available then.
I made it, but I was a serious accident or a medical emergency away from who knows what.
Lonestarblue
(13,480 posts)I know some here have Medicare Advantage plans they like, but I support getting rid of them because they are draining the Medicare funds at a far faster rate than original Medicare because of insurance company profits driving costs up. I suspect it would cost less to add the vision and other coverage to original Medicare than to keep funding insurance companies that always figure out a way to increase their profits at government expense.
Celerity
(54,407 posts)https://prospect.org/health/medicare-advantage-is-a-massive-scam/

If youve ever watched cable news, where the average viewer is in their late sixties, youve probably seen an advertisement for a Medicare Advantage plan. They usually star some washed-up celebrity whose career peaked right around when todays retirees were young adults (think Jimmy Walker or Joe Namath). And they always make a lot of big promises about how great Medicare Advantage coverage is. Theres just one problem: The sales pitch is an abject lie. Medicare Advantage is much worse than traditional Medicare for people on the program and costs a great deal more to boot. But unless the Biden administration changes course, private companies will soon devour the rest of the program.
Medicare Advantage plans are typically a combination of Medigap plans, which cover services not included in the government plan like vision and dental, plus a privatized version of traditional Medicare. About 28 million American seniors are now on Advantage plans, or about 40 percent of the whole program. As Barbara Caress explains in the Prospect, it was set up back in the late 1990s as a way for those wonderful private insurance companies we all know and love to work their free-market magic on one corner of the system America carved out as publicly run. Once we got business involved, surely the quality of coverage would improve and costs would go down, right?
The problem with this logic, as people realized even back in the glory days of neoliberalism, is that there are a lot of perverse financial incentives in health insurance, particularly when it comes to seniors. Half the reason the government set up Medicare in the first place was that as people reach the end of life, they tend to become sick and require more treatment than they can personally afford. In the pre-Medicare days, private companies did all they could to keep them off the insurance rolls.
Introducing the profit motive into Medicare has led to considerable hoop-jumping just to prevent such cravenness. For instance, if the government were to calculate the average per-person cost of Medicare and pay private companies that much per enrollee, companies would scramble to snap up all the younger, healthier seniors with relatively few problems, and cream off some easy profits. As Matt Bruenig explains, thats why the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services maintains a gigantic database of every single one of the roughly 64 million Medicare enrollees, and assigns them all a risk score based on their demographic and health characteristics. Advantage companies then get paid, in theory at least, according to how sick their risk pools are.
snip
Hidden audits reveal millions in overcharges by Medicare Advantage plans
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2022/11/21/1137500875/audit-medicare-advantage-overcharged-medicare

Newly released federal audits reveal widespread overcharges and other errors in payments to Medicare Advantage health plans, with some plans overbilling the government more than $1,000 per patient a year on average. Summaries of the 90 audits, which examined billings from 2011 through 2013 and are the most recent reviews completed, were obtained exclusively by KHN through a three-year Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, which was settled in late September.
The government's audits uncovered about $12 million in net overpayments for the care of 18,090 patients sampled, though the actual losses to taxpayers are likely much higher. Medicare Advantage, a fast-growing alternative to original Medicare, is run primarily by major insurance companies.

Officials at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services have said they intend to extrapolate the payment error rates from those samples across the total membership of each plan and recoup an estimated $650 million from insurers as a result. But after nearly a decade, that has yet to happen. CMS was set to unveil a final extrapolation rule Nov. 1 but recently put that decision off until February.
Ted Doolittle, a former deputy director of CMS' Center for Program Integrity, which oversees Medicare's efforts to fight fraud and billing abuse, said the agency has failed to hold Medicare Advantage plans accountable. "I think CMS fell down on the job on this," said Doolittle, now the health care advocate for the state of Connecticut. Doolittle said CMS appears to be "carrying water" for the insurance industry, which is "making money hand over fist" off Medicare Advantage plans. "From the outside, it seems pretty smelly," he said.
snip
area51
(12,691 posts)At least phase it in, drop the age 10 years every year 'til you get to zero.
mcar
(46,056 posts)IbogaProject
(5,913 posts)I'm 55, and Medicare would cover less than my state of ny coverage. I'd get fleeced w only 80% coverage and doctors prohibited from offering discounts. I say Medicare for all and force Medicare coverage to 100% with whatever is needed to discourage hypocondriacs. We can cover every one for less, paying just a little more per capita than what Canada does now. They spend less per capita so they have shortfalls we could avoud. We can do their plan better here. Even car insurance would go down in cost.
Delphinus
(12,522 posts)definitely for Medicare for All. Worked on that back right after President Obama got elected in 2008. I think I heard Senator Bernie Sanders talk about Medicare for All this morning on 1A with Jen White.
IbogaProject
(5,913 posts)I was objecting to moving the Medicare age down as a stopgap to continue the for profit insurance debacle. Medicare only covers 80% and doctors are forbidden from offering to forgive the 20% by the contractual terms of being a Medicare biller. So being type 1 diabetic I'll hit any copays and deductibles. It's a two side fix w single payer everyone covered. One is reducing administrative costs from 33% to 3% or less. The other would be to fund more education, training and funding or expanded medical capacity. The number or doctors and other specialties has been limited is a kind of price fixing.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Celerity
(54,407 posts)republianmushroom
(22,326 posts)raise the cap.
W_HAMILTON
(10,333 posts)This is at least the second time this mistake has been made in this thread.
Please, everyone, educate yourselves on the difference between Medicare and Social Security.
IbogaProject
(5,913 posts)The scam is the wealthy and their managerial class collect income in ways that isn't counted as wages.