General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOh, this? Just some teenage girls from Africa who invented a urine-powered generator.
Last edited Fri Nov 9, 2012, 02:22 AM - Edit history (1)
on edit: looks like some of the more scientisty types on du have pointed out that the process is not very efficient for making electricity and is best used for processing waste.... well I say, who gives a shit!! these girls are still totally awesome either way....
....of course, I am just kidding, the good science on the part of the folks posting here is actually very welcomed, since I have only basic knowledge of this sort of thing - thanks
How's this for an innovative startup: four African girls the eldest of which is just fifteen years old have worked together to invent a generator that's powered by urine. The group presented their creation at this year's Maker Faire Africa, and it's so freaking brilliant it makes me want travel back in time and punch 15-year-old me right in the solar plexus.
The Next Web lays out how it works:
Urine is put into an electrolytic cell, which cracks the urea into nitrogen, water, and hydrogen.
The hydrogen goes into a water filter for purification, which then gets pushed into the gas cylinder.
The gas cylinder pushes hydrogen into a cylinder of liquid borax, which is used to remove the moisture from the hydrogen gas.
This purified hydrogen gas is pushed into the generator.
1 Liter of urine gives you 6 hours of electricity.
link: http://io9.com/5958887/oh-this-just-some-teenage-girls-from-africa-who-invented-a-urine+powered-generator
MrMickeysMom
(20,453 posts)I have not read this yet, but had to sqee for thinking they could do this.
That's fucking brilliant!
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)That's actually quite awesome, honestly.
It's converting the body's stored energy into electricity. However unlike using muscle power (say, cranking a dynamo) it doesn't cut into our own energy resources (calories). Rather it breaks down the chemical bonds in a human waste product (urine) to produce hydrogen to fuel a generator.
Because it's using energy that is otherwise inaccessible to us - and would just be thrown away - the net energy gain is effectively 100%. Maybe not that great, perhaps, as it still relies on chemicals that we have to ingest and process (you can't just drink water until you're urinating pure H2O and expect it to work)
of course, I presume that six hours of electricity isn't being measured against an American level of electricity usage... but still.
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)I am not that great at chemistry... but in order to get the breakdown they need, they need something to power that process... tyhey might get 6 hours of electricity... but they may need, for example, enough gasoline or alcohol that might produce 4 hours on its own... I think that's what's happening here - if you check out the website, there are lots of scientisty types discussing it...
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)And, yes of course, the process requires more energy input than output.
The process was not "invented" by these girls either. It has been suggested for years as a cogeneration method for waste water treatment.
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)that would be the inventive part also, the article said they invented the generator, not the process
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The process was invented in connection with waste water treatment in order to improve efficiency by getting a small fraction of energy return.
You could say that the regenerative brakes in a hybrid car also "generate" electricity too - once you have accelerated the car and are looking for a way to slow it down anyway.
The key line in the article which indicates the author has no clue whatsoever, and should spur one to do some checking is the "six hours of electricity" line. That is such an utterly ridiculous and uninformstive way to characterize electrical energy production that one should immediately question any other assertion in it, because it screams "I don't know wtf I'm talking about."
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)of course I'm kidding
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The actual inventor - a chemical engineer in Ohio, said
"It is a high school project, so dont take it <so seriously>, Botte said, suggesting the students work with an engineer to understand the technology and its appropriate applications."
http://m.nbcnews.com/technology/futureoftech/african-girls-pee-powered-generator-raises-questions-1C6956099
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)Wow...I'm in awe.
uponit7771
(90,348 posts)...made efficient like it has been for a couple of other devices the the whole "energy" from nothing crap can be dispelled...
Or, it could be easier to get more out of urine than sea water.
It's not energy from nothing, or in this case getting more energy out of a substance than what is put into it to get it out, its a lot of what we use from a little of what isn't as useful...
6 hours of running from one liter = more energy out of urine than what went it to extracting it (in theory).
I pray they get funded for larger devices
niyad
(113,496 posts)SubgeniusHasSlack
(276 posts)Brilliant ladies.
Fridays Child
(23,998 posts)Awesome!
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)This is so awesome!
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)It was written up in the local paper several years ago. I don't know whatever became of her process.
CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)I hope they're able to find a way to put it to productive use soon. Great for them!
DCKit
(18,541 posts)Warpy
(111,305 posts)teaching physics and chemistry, one third world country at a time.
Her stories of how students would kludge together equipment from what they found in rubbish dumps so they could perform experiments was mind boggling.
I am not surprised this has happened in Africa, not a bit.
It doesn't say what the power source for the electrolysis is. Let's hope if this goes into production, PVCs are part of it.
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)the low level of exchange for power output vs. input is... it looks like it has only a small net gain like I thought it would be... but not much.... considering what they are working with though, it's impressive and i am sure that if they get funding, who knows?
Warpy
(111,305 posts)efficient enough to supply household needs very nicely and since solar cells especially are dropping in cost and will continue to do so, that sounds like a great solution.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Blue Owl
(50,454 posts)n/t
Fire Walk With Me
(38,893 posts)woolldog
(8,791 posts)Separation
(1,975 posts)But it's good to see young minds taking steps to try and think outside the box. Exactly what we need.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The process was invented by a chemical engineer in Ohio, and does not produce net energy.
http://m.nbcnews.com/technology/futureoftech/african-girls-pee-powered-generator-raises-questions-1C6956099
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)Indpndnt
(2,391 posts)In Africa. With scant resources and less than university-level teaching. Now she says they should work with an engineer to understand what they just did and what to do with it. She's not a bit impressed by what they accomplished, is she?
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)What an absurd way to read the article.
No - an actual tech reporter with a clue spent a few moments on Google, tracked down someone who actually knew something about the process, and got an informed comment.
The comment seems more along the lines of suggesting that if these girls think they are generating net power, then they should hook up with someone who can explain they are not.
It's a high school science project which demonstrates a wonderful principle these girls learned. An electricity generation method it is not.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)urine can break down into its chemical elements and then experiment with how we can use those chemical elements then they are still ahead of most US students. They are on the right track and I bet with the knowledge they are learning we will probably be hearing more from them in the future. Africa is actually growing very fast right now. There will be some very good things coming from them in the future.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Aside from the fact that you can learn how to electrolyze urine from a YouTube video, the notion that a university professor is somehow expressing piqué by suggesting these girls further their education, is just wacky.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)(With the exception of my despair at the general level of science education among DU readers)
Of COURSE there are bright teenagers all over the planet who put together great science fair projects. As someone who has volunteered to judge science fair projects on multiple occasions, I LOVE this stuff.
What irks me are presumably educated ADULTS in the US who think a phrase like "six hours of electricity" conveys meaningful information. I mean come on - you can get two YEARS out of a watch battery, to run your watch.
These girls are great. I just find it depressing for our future that adults here can be so simultaneously uninformed and condescendingly patronizing - as if understanding electrolysis of a conductive aqueous solution was some great mystery which is astounding that an African teenage girl could understand it. Thank goodness they weren't raised among people in the US who think that way.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)Most people can't pass a history or civics quiz either.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)Aside from the discussion.... It will inspire more kids to look into the Ides of energy being pulled from waste.... Anything that baby steps us away from corporate fuel dependency, is a good thing
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)...and going viral in the same manner as the perennial "water powered car" which has more to do with magical thinking among people who don't bother to learn any science, but figure the reason we don't have them is the consequence of some kind of conspiracy.
And, please, I'm not knocking a cute science fair project. I am knocking the fundamentally dumb reportage.
trailmonkee
(2,681 posts)I enjoyed checking out the African makers project website too.... The worlds an awful big place, lots of smart kids out there... You never know where the next genius will come from
Indpndnt
(2,391 posts)What an absurd way to read a post. But, please, continue telling us how we shouldn't be impressed with children creating something out of nothing in one of the poorest regions in the world. The fact that they can access the internet and apply what they find there is amazing in and of itself. Not all kids in poor countries (including poor areas of the US) have those resources. And they did it all without having the luxury of sitting in an engineering lab in a university and ordering materials through the science department. Nowhere did it say they were going to use it to seriously generate electricity for anyone's use. They have to start somewhere. Could you do what they did when you were a child? Unfortunately, the engineer was dismissive, not encouraging. Too bad.
Thor_MN
(11,843 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)don't laugh,...ever have a case of the ?
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)That's what I love about the innovation coming from Africa. They take the natural resources(sun) and natural waste(urine, feces) and turn it into power. Sometimes I think we think we're too above it all to get down in the dirt or the poop and pee. That is brilliant.
LadyHawkAZ
(6,199 posts)secondwind
(16,903 posts)Kablooie
(18,637 posts)Besides the fact that these are some amazing teens.
Most of the technology that is developed for third world countries comes from Europe, the US or Japan.
It sometimes feels like the rich, smart guys are condescending to help out the poor, stupid peasants. Noblesse Oblige.
It's encouraging to see that some African children are getting the kind of education that trains them to use their minds to help solve their problems themselves.
I'm sure there would be pride for Africans knowing they were using technology developed for and by their own people.
PossumSqueezins
(184 posts)We could use it to power the East Coast.
caseymoz
(5,763 posts). . . excuse me for being skeptical. I've seen too many other schemes for miracle energy based on the "Free Lunch" hypothesis. In all of them, the energy yield measured in turned out to be not nearly as high as it was claimed to be during the "attract investors" stage of the project.
Now that I've said that, I will say it's worth a glance, if for no other reason because we're talking about a renewable resource.
By the way, six hours of electricity doesn't tell you anything. How much electricity for six hours? Enough to run an LED or enough to run a refrigerator?