General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWas anyone else as late as we were in learning that...
...Blacks were excluded from the GI Bill after World War II?
Hubby and I only learned that this year. He's 87. I'm 78. We were anti-war, civil rights activists, demonstrators for this and that, right up till today. But we didn't know this mind blowing fact until last year.
Anyone else like us out there????
Important update. It was not, after all, an official policy of the government. Thanks to Silent Type for the correction.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/black-world-war-ii-vets-gi-bill/
not know either. Guess nobody really wanted to talk about it. How awful.
Celerity
(54,837 posts)Until the New Deal, blacks had shown their traditional loyalty to the party of Abraham Lincoln by voting overwhelmingly Republican. By the end of Roosevelt's first administration, however, one of the most dramatic voter shifts in American history had occurred. In 1936, some 75 percent of black voters supported the Democrats. Blacks turned to Roosevelt, in part, because his spending programs gave them a measure of relief from the Depression and, in part, because the GOP had done little to repay their earlier support.
Still, Roosevelt's record on civil rights was modest at best. Instead of using New Deal programs to promote civil rights, the administration consistently bowed to discrimination. In order to pass major New Deal legislation, Roosevelt needed the support of southern Democrats. Time and time again, he backed away from equal rights to avoid antagonizing southern whites; although, his wife, Eleanor, did take a public stand in support of civil rights.
Most New Deal programs discriminated against blacks. The NRA, for example, not only offered whites the first crack at jobs, but authorized separate and lower pay scales for blacks. The Federal Housing Authority (FHA) refused to guarantee mortgages for blacks who tried to buy in white neighborhoods, and the CCC maintained segregated camps. Furthermore, the Social Security Act excluded those job categories blacks traditionally filled.
The story in agriculture was particularly grim. Since 40 percent of all black workers made their living as sharecroppers and tenant farmers, the Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA) acreage reduction hit blacks hard. White landlords could make more money by leaving land untilled than by putting land back into production. As a result, the AAA's policies forced more than 100,000 blacks off the land in 1933 and 1934. Even more galling to black leaders, the president failed to support an anti-lynching bill and a bill to abolish the poll tax. Roosevelt feared that conservative southern Democrats, who had seniority in Congress and controlled many committee chairmanships, would block his bills if he tried to fight them on the race question.
snip
malaise
(297,846 posts)so it can be reintroduced
Mister Ed
(6,988 posts)That's a great point, and one that had never occurred to me until you brought it to my attention just now.
Until this moment, I thought that right-wingers just wanted to bury the racist aspects of history because it's a shameful truth that they'd rather not contemplate. But it's much more than that, isn't it? They know that "those who forget history are doomed to repeat it", and they want it all forgotten so they can get busy repeating it.
Thank you for providing me with this epiphany. I will carry it in the forefront of my mind.
malaise
(297,846 posts)Theres a reason why slave laws still exist. Four states removed them from their constitutions but not Louisiana.
This was last year
https://lailluminator.com/2022/11/17/the-story-behind-why-louisiana-voted-against-a-ban-on-slavery/
Last week, Louisiana voters struck down an amendment to its constitution that would have prohibited slavery and involuntary servitude.
The four other states where slavery was on the ballot Alabama, Oregon, Tennessee and Vermont approved similar referenda. Louisiana was put in the national spotlight for rejecting the change.
Trevor Noah did an entire sketch on The Daily Show, mocking Louisiana for voting against ending slavery. Correspondent Roy Wood Jr., who is Black, pretended to stand just over the states border, joking, Im safer here in Mississippi, which is something no Black man has ever said.
Mister Ed
(6,988 posts)I have to thank you again for providing me with additional education.
malaise
(297,846 posts)Its all good😀
Response to Celerity (Reply #2)
malaise This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tetrachloride
(9,698 posts)Silent Type
(12,412 posts)discrimination, colleges that wouldnt accept Blacks, banks wouldnt lend for homes in predominantly Black areas, job discrimination, etc., that kept these veterans from benefitting.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/black-world-war-ii-vets-gi-bill/
Ultimately, it doesnt matter why it happened. It did and its negatively impacted generations.
Those days are what GOPers mean by good ole days, MAGA, etc.
LAS14
(15,537 posts)doc03
(39,160 posts)LAS14
(15,537 posts)EYESORE 9001
(29,878 posts)You really are a rabble-rouser, arent you?
Were still fighting these battles today, thanks to resurgent Jim Crow repression at the ballot box and a host of evils advanced in the name of states rights. Segregationists in Congress ensured that administration of the GI Bill benefits resided with the states, where some aspects of the program were discarded altogether because it would help black veterans disproportionately. They didnt care that white veterans were harmed as well. Pure-D evil.
Ive read discussion of reparations for descendants of black veterans who were disenfranchised from sharing in the postwar economy and chance to generate wealth. I stand four square behind those efforts.
LAS14
(15,537 posts)...which part was rabble rousing.
EYESORE 9001
(29,878 posts)I admire what youve accomplished.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)RKP5637
(67,112 posts)minds. We must bury this, it might make White Nationalists uncomfortable to hear this happened.
Johnny2X2X
(24,428 posts)Dont forget redlining. Had a massive effect on generational wealth transference.
My own city, Grand Rapids, had a long history with redlining that still has deep effects all over town. A local news agency did a great multi story series on it in February. This stuff was still going on to at least some degree into recent decades. And even today, real estate agents discriminate against minorities.
Celerity
(54,837 posts)
Furthermore, white job counselors at local employment offices across the country refused to refer Black veterans for skilled or semi-skilled jobs, even though many of them came back from the war as fully trained mechanics, welders, electricians, and more.
Given that an overwhelming majority of Black veterans who fought in World War II were not able to benefit from the GI Bill of Rights, and were excluded from accessing it through a combination of racism, exclusionary federal and state law, and poor implementation, we rate this claim as Mostly True.
IbogaProject
(6,061 posts)His administration made a separate pay scale for African Americans under whatever was the name used.
mgardener
(2,396 posts)Retrograde
(11,450 posts)de facto exclusion? Was it like the original Social Security programs, that didn't apply to agricultural or domestic workers at first? While the results may be the same, from reading the previous posts it seems that the exclusion was more on the part of the institutions - banks and colleges - that administered the program rather than the bill itself.
JudyM
(29,785 posts)Thanks for posting.
The GI Bill helped my father
he wouldnt have been able to afford college otherwise and he continued on beyond that (ABD), enriching his life. He was grateful for the GI Bill. He also felt passionately about donating to the United Negro College Fund from early on
he was a Republican but saw the inequality and felt strong empathy. We didnt discuss the racist aspects of the postwar economy, specifically, but I wonder now if his focus was in part because he witnessed the GI Bill-associated inequities.
PurgedVoter
(2,720 posts)White folk moving in and destroying the neighborhood. With the mcmansions going up and property taxes matching with the bubble in my area, a community here in Texas once considered one of the cheapest places to live in the United States, is off all lists having to do with affordability.
The systemic injustice isn't just something that happened when we were young or before we were born. It's been part of planning the whole time. The rich won't continue getting bigger and bigger slices of the pie unless the pie keeps getting cut up. It's racism but its also a systemic attack on the bottom fifty percent. Probably the bottom 90 percent, but as they get above the bottom fifty, a lot of folk start blaming the bottom fifty for their financial fears.
Hamlette
(15,556 posts)during the Vietnam war, many young men tried to avoid the draft by claiming they were gay even if you were not (you couldn't join if you were gay). So they declared that on their application. The government then required you provide evidence from 2 of your partners and a shrink. At that time, it was a bridge too far and few were able to meet the requirements for an exemption for being gay and were drafted and served their time, many of them in Vietnam.
When those men were discharged, the government went back and if you had said on your application you were gay, even though you had served, you were denied all benefits. the GI bill and otherwise and given a dishonorable discharge.
Hamlette
(15,556 posts)Hitler sent gays to concentration camps with a specific sentence, usually many many years.
When the war was over, the US and Western European countries decided any gays who survived the camps should serve out their sentences and were sent to prison in Great Britain to complete their sentences.
Makes me boil.
Ford_Prefect
(8,663 posts)What's True
While a few Black veterans were able to benefit from housing and education opportunities granted by the GI Bill of Rights, the vast majority of Black veterans were excluded from such benefits due to nationwide racism and discrimination against Black people. However ...
What's False
Black veterans were not meant to be excluded from the GI Bill existing discriminatory laws and implementation ensured they were. Not all Black veterans were excluded, though all of them faced numerous challenges getting their benefits due to racism.
moniss
(9,145 posts)in all areas of government programs like the Department of Agriculture. Programs meant to give assistance to farmers "somehow" had low participation by black farmers. Not a low number of applications on a percentage basis but rather a low number that got processed through and approved. "Somehow" the paperwork was always lost or this thing or that needed to be "evaluated". Or an application would drag on so that that the crop year came and went and so your old application was moot.
ancianita
(43,334 posts)I wasn't certified to teach history, so wasn't aware that it might or might not have been in history books. But I am pretty sure it's in all African American history books that my students read, or at least was conveyed in their history classes, since they were the ones who mentioned it to me on several occasions.
Now I've just assumed that it's now common knowledge. Guess not.
calimary
(90,724 posts)And Im another one only learning about it at this late date.
ShazzieB
(22,859 posts)Yeah, I just learned about it recently as well.
LoisB
(13,423 posts)agricultural and domestic workers? In 1935, what group of citizens were farm workers and maids? Three guesses and the first two don't count.
Kaleva
(40,424 posts)Scroll down to table 1
https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v70n4/v70n4p49.html
Where did you get your info from?
LoisB
(13,423 posts)at the time were either agricultural workers or domestic workers therefore a greater percentage of that population would have been excluded.
https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v70n4/v70n4p49.html#:~:text=The%201935%20act%20limited%20its,were%20farm%20and%20domestic%20workers.
Kaleva
(40,424 posts)LoisB
(13,423 posts)out my unclear statement.
Evolve Dammit
(21,814 posts)meadowlander
(5,154 posts)Should be standard high school curriculum.
It's a fascinating subject though - how what seems like innocuous zoning decisions can be arrayed against whole communities like the Catholics in Northern Ireland and the Palestinians in Israel.
kimbutgar
(27,539 posts)High on an aptitude test. He was sent to Howard University to do a trading program for African American leadership in the colored units. When my Dad returned to his home town after the war he saw his white friends who he grew up with and who had served get those GI Loans for college and home mortgages but he was excluded. Fast forward years later the group started having yearly reunions and called themselves the Prometheans. Despite having so many obstacles the majority went on to become doctors, lawyers, civil servants and lived middle class lives. I heard about this when I attended a reunion with my Dad when I was 19 years and it pissed me off.
TigressDem
(5,126 posts)BUT did not realize that even if you HAD the GI Bill that you couldn't get the money for a home loan.
I guess it should have made sense that even if you could get the VA benefits for college tuition if the college didn't let someone in because of race, it was still an issue.
BUT were some states not even allowing vets to use GI Bill at traditional black colleges?
IF the college would accept it, was there STILL a way to deny the GI Bill benefit?
Did the States simply with hold the benefits completely or was it more the outside structure of racism that made the GI Bill moot?