Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

canetoad

(17,197 posts)
Wed Mar 15, 2023, 01:11 AM Mar 2023

Healthcare hypothetical

Seven, eight, nine years ago the Aussie government decided to impose a tax on tobacco that automatically increased twice a year at a predetermined amount. Not sure of the details, but I think it was around 10%.

At the time, I was a tobacco smoker, on a fixed income. Each half yearly price rise hurt me more and more. In 2020 a pouch of tobacco, papers and filters went up to $140, a pack of cigs around $60.

I gave tobacco up in October 2020. Lifetime smoker, haven't looked back. It was a choice between smoking and paying my bills.

I was angry and resentful at the time, but yes, the government strategy of pricing people OUT of smoking worked. I needed to admit to myself that I have almost unlimited free healthcare and my responsibility is to do what I can not to put a burden on that healthcare system.

Strangely, there was a little agitation in Oz but not much. Maybe most people accepted that it was time to give up ciggies. That's the compromise we accept for having universal healthcare - a restriction in our ability to smoke tobacco.

I can live with that.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Healthcare hypothetical (Original Post) canetoad Mar 2023 OP
I was in Singapore a year ago. Phoenix61 Mar 2023 #1
The government was correct malaise Mar 2023 #2
Good for you! brer cat Mar 2023 #3

Phoenix61

(17,020 posts)
1. I was in Singapore a year ago.
Wed Mar 15, 2023, 05:14 AM
Mar 2023

Outside of a huge office/shopping area was a tiny little square smoking area in the middle of the public space. People were crammed into this little area marked out by yellow paint lines. It seemed obvious they were going for public shaming.

malaise

(269,212 posts)
2. The government was correct
Wed Mar 15, 2023, 06:32 AM
Mar 2023

They should not use tax payer money for our unhealthy and dangerous choices.

brer cat

(24,624 posts)
3. Good for you!
Wed Mar 15, 2023, 07:38 AM
Mar 2023

I quit after decades of smoking. It's never easy, but having financial incentives helps.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Healthcare hypothetical