Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tblue37

(68,449 posts)
Sat Mar 18, 2023, 12:29 AM Mar 2023

Encouraging take about Jack Smith:



People need to understand that Jack Smith wasn't brought in to start the Trump investigation ... He was brought in to bring it home.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Cha

(320,590 posts)
6. Yeah, but to be current..
Sat Mar 18, 2023, 02:25 AM
Mar 2023

dt Devolved into a Traitor to the USA.. & the Leader of a Failed Coup to Overturn the US Government.

Just to name a couple of his biggest hits.

Journeyman

(15,485 posts)
3. This is the way I've always seen it. Were I in Garland's position, I wouldn't have brought in . . .
Sat Mar 18, 2023, 12:49 AM
Mar 2023

a man of Smith's caliber to bear witness to what a doofus I'd been for almost two years. In baseball parlance, Smith was brought in as a closer, not a starting pitcher.

Captain Zero

(8,954 posts)
4. If white house changes hands he's there to finish
Sat Mar 18, 2023, 02:16 AM
Mar 2023

Special Prosecutors are only done when THEY SAY they are done.

A gop victory in 2024 won't be able remove him.

 

Silent3

(15,909 posts)
7. In the, "Oh, God. We've actually got to do something about this, huh?" sense...
Sat Mar 18, 2023, 02:28 AM
Mar 2023

…of bringing it home.

Bernardo de La Paz

(60,320 posts)
9. Exactly. Garland knows details, knows the rump is guilty, but had to formalize it to distance it
Sat Mar 18, 2023, 08:05 AM
Mar 2023

This is my speculation, of course I don't read minds or remote view documents and computer screens in offices.

1) Smith took over long-running complex investigations. Fact.

2) Smith is no nonsense kinda guy. Fact.

3) Garland was pipped by (McConnell and) the rump who appointed three judges to Garland's rightful seat. Fact. Thus Garland is forced to add a layer between him and indictment. Garland must still decline to veto an indictment recommendation from Smith, but will simply rubber-stamp it, correctly. This will lower the temperature a little bit (not much) and we can all use the cumulative effect of many efforts to lower the temperature a little bit.

4) I'm sorry. All this manouevring is necessary for success and takes time.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Encouraging take about Ja...