Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If a prosecutor had been on the fence over indicting Trump ... (Original Post) Kennah Mar 2023 OP
I'd like to think that isn't true.... getagrip_already Mar 2023 #1
I think they are all afraid to be the first to indict. louis-t Mar 2023 #2
Very true Kennah Mar 2023 #3
Even if they have to use a magnifying glass to see said private parts. Nevilledog Mar 2023 #4
The news today was that the grand jury didn't meet iemanja Mar 2023 #5

getagrip_already

(14,838 posts)
1. I'd like to think that isn't true....
Wed Mar 22, 2023, 05:15 PM
Mar 2023

Prosecutors should rely on the evidence and not being pissed or intimidated.

But in this case, I doubt it has much of an effect on the charging decision.

Neither do the house antics.

Bragg never wanted this case. He may still decline to ask for indictment.

louis-t

(23,297 posts)
2. I think they are all afraid to be the first to indict.
Wed Mar 22, 2023, 06:02 PM
Mar 2023

Once one falls, the rest will come very soon after.

iemanja

(53,072 posts)
5. The news today was that the grand jury didn't meet
Wed Mar 22, 2023, 09:20 PM
Mar 2023

A grand jury hasn't even issued a finding yet. They aren't close to a prosecutor's indicting. As usually, the rumors are nothing but bullshit.
And to think people bought into it because Trump said so--Trump, a pathological liar.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If a prosecutor had been ...