Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(84,274 posts)
Thu Mar 23, 2023, 11:31 PM Mar 2023

Revived measure to require 60% for Ohio constitutional amendments gets first hearing

More than a dozen people milled around in crypt-like hallways of the Statehouse basement Wednesday morning. They’d shown up almost an hour early for the first hearing of Ohio House Joint Resolution 1, a proposal which would require 60% of the vote to pass constitutional amendments.

Rep. Brian Stewart, R-Ashville, brought forward a similar proposal in the waning days of the last general assembly. That effort fell short, but he promised to try again.

Organizers criticize the higher threshold as subverting a century-old democratic right, a craven attempt to forestall amendments related to abortion and redistricting, and just plain old short-sighted.

The new resolution carries a pair of even more stringent provisions. Stewart explained the additions in January alongside a couple dozen co-sponsors.

“The new version would require that signatures come from all 88 counties instead of just 44,” Stewart said. “If an amendment is going to apply to every Ohio and then every community should have a hand in putting that potential constitution amendment on the ballot.”



https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2023/03/23/revived-measure-to-require-60-for-ohio-constitutional-amendments-gets-first-hearing/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Revived measure to require 60% for Ohio constitutional amendments gets first hearing (Original Post) RandySF Mar 2023 OP
They're trying the same shit that MI-GQP did after our 2018 successful proposals. roamer65 Mar 2023 #1
Planning ahead? OAITW r.2.0 Mar 2023 #2

roamer65

(37,953 posts)
1. They're trying the same shit that MI-GQP did after our 2018 successful proposals.
Thu Mar 23, 2023, 11:36 PM
Mar 2023

Our courts struck their bullshit law down.

They want to stop a pro-Abortion proposal as well.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Revived measure to requir...