Three things the media should have their hair on fire about but don't seem to care much about

[LymphocyteLover]

1) the climate crisis and the urgent need to decarbonize the economy (see the latest IPCC report)

2) Republicans holding trump above the law and threatening law enforcement

3) the Trump/DeSantis/GOP war on women, black people and LGBTQ


WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE???

[PJMcK]

1. Outrage?

From the MSM?

Surely, you jest.

[Marcus IM]

2. You think Wall Street owned corporations have interests other than maximizing profits?

They want tax cuts.
They want America's Social Security to be privatized.
They want to kill FICA contributions by employers.

They get these things by having republican government. It's how gerrymandered "democratic" capitalism works.

[Boomerproud]

3. Are you contacting them to get answers?

Your points are absolutely valid but the only one of the three they are interested in is political crap. Trump WANTS to be in front a judge in handcuffs and they know it.

[yaesu]

4. If we actually had a newsmedia in this country. nt

[Shipwack]

5. Where's the outrage? It depends...

How much money does being outraged make the media?

[LymphocyteLover]

7. seems to work for rightwing media

[Fiendish Thingy]

6. Outrage is not the currency of good media outlets, that's for propaganda and clickbait outlets.

That said, covering important stories affecting viewers should be the priority of all good news outlets.

[johnnyfins]

8. None are profitable

1) Nothing shall interfere with the left/right horse race.

If climate change was made a huge deal,it would benefit liberals

Holding pisshair accountable benefits liberals.

Same for number 3.

Their horse race model is supreme in their minds. It equals ratings.

[BOSSHOG]

9. I'd like to see some singed tresses

Over the conservative attitude about the pending conservative debt ceiling disaster. Blindly blaming your “enemies” for everything wrong as is the gop play book is not a solution. Reading this post you can tell I’m Woke.

[Botany]

10. # 4 The top FBI agent in NYC in 2016 was on Putin's payroll. Charles F. McGonigal.

# 4 The top FBI agent in NYC in 2016 was on Putin's payroll. Charles F. McGonigal and he got the
NY Times to put on its front page there was no connection between Trump and Russia and then he
got the director of the FBI to bring up HRC and that phony ass email shit again. The Russian paying
McGonigal, Olge Deripaska was the money behind Tony DeDevolder (Santos) who job it is to be a
Chaos agent inside the House of Reps.

[Evolve Dammit]

15. has he been indicted? At least "removed from service"?

[BlueWaveNeverEnd]

11. kick

[Martin68]

12. The Washington Post and the NYT report on these topics daily.

[ZonkerHarris]

13. oh sure, they are going to pick sides in partisan issues. Have you met the media lately?

[Duppers]

14. Exactly!

TY!

[ZonkerHarris]

16. sure they are going to pick sides in partisan issues. Have you met the media lately?

[LymphocyteLover]

19. the NYTimes has in-depth columns and articles on all sorts of topics

but can't seem to muster any urgency for the most pressing issues, same for the WaPo and my local paper... there still are people who apparently read long form reporting

[lees1975]

18. Why not focus on the outstanding management of the economy by the Biden administration

or the accomplishments of this President in his first two years in office?

Stop putting the narrative and spotlight on nut jobs and kooks like Desantis, Trump and Marjorie two names.

[LymphocyteLover]

20. that too, sure

I'm just sooo tired of the rightwing slant and catering to their concerns