Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An appreciation thread for Bragg, Willis, James and Garland (Original Post) Beastly Boy Mar 2023 OP
K & R! 50 Shades Of Blue Mar 2023 #1
Appreciate all claudette Mar 2023 #2
Then, so should Willis and James. What's the difference? Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #3
True claudette Mar 2023 #4
In this case, neither Bragg, nor Willis, nor James matter, right? Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #6
No. claudette Mar 2023 #7
The Manhattan DA's office began investigating Trump's involvemrnt in payments to Stormy in Aug 2018, Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #11
It adds up claudette Mar 2023 #14
Garland had less evidence on March 10, 2021, than either one of the others Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #15
Thank You, Beastly Boy! Cha Mar 2023 #24
Exactly Joinfortmill Mar 2023 #18
Such a Good Idea! Mahalo, AJs Cha Mar 2023 #5
Big mahalo for adding Jack Smith. Beastly Boy Mar 2023 #12
Indeed! Cha Mar 2023 #22
K AND R gopiscrap Mar 2023 #8
Thank you bdamomma Mar 2023 #9
K&R. nt MarineCombatEngineer Mar 2023 #10
Thank you, all! AND Jack Smith! AND the Grand Jury! raging moderate Mar 2023 #13
Yes! True patriots! AllyCat Mar 2023 #16
Soon Trump will be BURIED in indictments. Joinfortmill Mar 2023 #17
As Hemingway once said: Gradually, then suddenly. DinahMoeHum Mar 2023 #21
Exactly! Cha Mar 2023 #25
Love this Joinfortmill Mar 2023 #26
The Anointed One flamingdem Mar 2023 #19
K & R Stuart G Mar 2023 #20
Bravo and Brava. sheshe2 Mar 2023 #23
 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
3. Then, so should Willis and James. What's the difference?
Thu Mar 30, 2023, 08:09 PM
Mar 2023

Except Garland has to deal with a couple of thousand additional cases.

 

claudette

(5,455 posts)
4. True
Thu Mar 30, 2023, 08:11 PM
Mar 2023

But an insurrection and stealing classified documents seem to have priority to me

 

claudette

(5,455 posts)
7. No.
Thu Mar 30, 2023, 08:16 PM
Mar 2023

They ALL matter. Insurrection and theft of classified docs were clear LONG ago. Long before a special counsel was chosen. In my view Bragg has the courage to do the right thing

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
11. The Manhattan DA's office began investigating Trump's involvemrnt in payments to Stormy in Aug 2018,
Thu Mar 30, 2023, 10:00 PM
Mar 2023

soon after Michael Cohen plead guilty to making the payments and pointed at Trump as the initiator of these payments. Bragg took over the investigation on 1/1/2022, when he took office as a new Manhattan DA, and as the case was well under way.

Letitia James began her investigation into the trump organization in March 2019.

Fanni Willis opened her investigation in early January 2021.

DOJ opened an investigation into the Jan 6 riot on Jan 7, 2021. Garland was appointed AG on March 11, 2021.

So how much earlier was the insurrection clearer than any of the other cases? It appears they all started long ago, some longer ago than the insurrection itself, not to mention the theft of documents that likely happened, in late January 2021 when Trump left the White House, and was revealed much later.

And none of the above attorneys, except Garland, were involved in investigating either the insurrection or theft of documents.

But somehow Garland is the one who was late to the game? Sorry, this doesn't add up.

 

claudette

(5,455 posts)
14. It adds up
Thu Mar 30, 2023, 10:12 PM
Mar 2023

to me. Garland had the evidence of Jan 6 in March when he was appointed. End of conversation. And the evidence in the documents case is even clearer. Nothing done there so he slides out of it by appointing a special counsel. Nothing will convince me Dump couldn't have been held accountable LONG before he began his run for 2024. Bragg puts Garland to shame. Period. I'm done.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
15. Garland had less evidence on March 10, 2021, than either one of the others
Thu Mar 30, 2023, 10:23 PM
Mar 2023

And about 1000 more cases related to his investigation than the others. Give or take a couple.

Unless, of course, you are assuming that Garland started an investigation of his own before he was appointed, and the others waited to begin theirs until after Garland was appointed. And even under this fantastic assumption, Garland would be late to the game compared to the others.

You are entitled to your own assumptions, but not your own calendar.

Cha

(319,135 posts)
24. Thank You, Beastly Boy!
Thu Mar 30, 2023, 11:16 PM
Mar 2023

You handled That Excellently.

Facts, Reality, Timelines... DOJ Garland is Very Much Appreciated and Matters Greatly to me and many to us who see what's actually going on.

 

Beastly Boy

(13,283 posts)
12. Big mahalo for adding Jack Smith.
Thu Mar 30, 2023, 10:01 PM
Mar 2023

He certainly belongs in this illustrious ompany.

sheshe2

(97,646 posts)
23. Bravo and Brava.
Thu Mar 30, 2023, 11:13 PM
Mar 2023

They did, are doing, the hard work and long tedious hours.

They endured both ridicule and threats of violence while doing their jobs. It was and is complicated. Every time they pulled a thread it led to another and then another. I find it unbelievable that so many people believe a case with so many players envolved would be a simple open and shut case.

Thanks for your OP, Beastly Boy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»An appreciation thread fo...