General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI have NEVER heard, "Innocent until proven Guilty" from our supposed liberal media
They never said that with Hillary.
They aren't saying it about Hunter Biden
It's just...remarkable.
senseandsensibility
(24,439 posts)H2O Man
(78,861 posts)because it is only applied to those charged with a crime. Neither Hillary nor Hunter have been.
EYESORE 9001
(29,525 posts)It separates the INDICTED from law-abiding citizens.
H2O Man
(78,861 posts)Criminals like Trump are presumed "innocent" only within the context of the legal system. It's not something that applies to those not charged with a crime, for obvious reasons. Thus, for reasons that the media considers legal protections, they use this along with "alleged" to describe even the very worst criminals, be they an accused mass shooter or Trump.
EYESORE 9001
(29,525 posts)if the media neglected to make that important nod toward presumption of innocence. Wed never hear the end of things like the media is lynching our client publicly or wokeness is suspending rule of law.
W_HAMILTON
(10,242 posts)BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)All I did was take the dogs for a walk!
Joinfortmill
(20,518 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Plenty of coverage of what Trump was doing. I dont see an inconsistency.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,906 posts)most people pronounce innocence or guilt long before a trial, and they don't change their minds even after the trial. Most people think O J Simpson is guilty of murder even though he was acquitted in court.
doc03
(38,941 posts)media prejudiced the jury and give cause for appeal or mistrial. Of course they will anyway though.
Karadeniz
(24,732 posts)betsuni
(28,892 posts)Sneaky and effective. I'm not even sure they know they're doing it.
