General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDecember sure seems like excessively long timeframe in which to schedule the next hearing
in TFG's case. I'm wondering if it's because the judge is privy that there are going to be much more serious charges (e.g. espionage) filed in the intervening months. Just curious. Thoughts?
lame54
(35,321 posts)Lettuce Be
(2,336 posts)Depositions will be scheduled, etc. etc. It's a long process and takes time. This is how it works. A simple auto accident with injuries would generally be set for trial one year after filing. That is because there are many other cases pending and discovery takes considerable time. Let the process work, be patient (I know!).
CanonRay
(14,113 posts)Discovery, motions for exclusion of evidence, motions for expert witnesses, etc. Yes, sure it will be a grind, but even so, 8 months to schedule the next hearing? Seems excessive to me.
Ocelot II
(115,836 posts)They handle something like 40,000 cases a year, and TFG's case doesn't get to butt ahead of cases that are already pending. Other prosecutions of TFG in other jurisdictions will have no impact on the scheduling of this one.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,711 posts)Given his age, if it was a civil case he could ask for an expedited docket lest it not be resolved before his demise. It's not a civil case and he likely will drag it out as long as he can.
Response to CanonRay (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
ExWhoDoesntCare
(4,741 posts)Rumor has it that the Manhattan court system is so backlogged that all the cases going to trial are backed up this long, if not longer.
It wouldn't surprise me if they do tens of thousands of cases, year in, year out.
This is one of the reasons the justice system is so "slow." Criminals are criming faster than they can be tried for it.