General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBye bye Uncle Thomas
Last edited Fri Apr 14, 2023, 07:43 AM - Edit history (1)
See Yah!
This last straw finally broke the camels back
Add link
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1017820454
FalloutShelter
(11,879 posts)I certainly hope this is the end of the road for Thomas.
dchill
(38,539 posts)Thomas is a snake 🐍 - not a camel 🐪
Deuxcents
(16,341 posts)Marius25
(3,213 posts)Celerity
(43,533 posts)SCOTUS Justice?
Would he vote on cases from prison?
The US Constitution has too many long wave ticking time bombs for the union of the States to survive until 2050. It probably starts to atomise long before that.
Zeitghost
(3,869 posts)And a conviction which would be a miracle in and of itself. Nobody is going to prison over inaccurate public disclosure forms.
Celerity
(43,533 posts)I they are not impeached and then convicted and removed, do they work from prison?
That is what I was asking.
The only way to remove him from the court is impeachment.
I doubt that he would have to operate from prison, but even were that to happen he would still be on the court unless and until he was impeached and removed
we can do it
(12,196 posts)gab13by13
(21,405 posts)it won't pass the House.
spooky3
(34,481 posts)And that its very clearcut. If so no law must be passed. The existing law must be enforced.
malaise
(269,174 posts)I was watching them.
It's up to the DOJ. In other times, the House would impeach, and the Senate convict and remove him. But at this point, it is up to the DOJ.
orleans
(34,073 posts)malaise
(269,174 posts)I think it does repeat but I'm never awake for that
Bev54
(10,072 posts)write the ethics without the house approval? The house has nothing else to do with Judges.
cilla4progress
(24,772 posts)nominee!!
Zeitghost
(3,869 posts)Would have to come through a constitutional amendment.
FBaggins
(26,760 posts)He appears to have inherited one-half of one-third of his grandparents' home decades ago when his grandfather passed away. Given the reported sale price and the time involved... his profit might have been a couple thousand dollars on the sale.
Nobody has claimed that he failed to pay any required taxes or that the billionaire funneled tons of cash to him in excess of what the property was worth. The law he appears to have violated was that he failed to report it.
Ok - are there prosecutions for that offense? What penalty is associated with a successful prosecution?
hadEnuf
(2,212 posts)Thomas isn't in much danger.
spooky3
(34,481 posts)leftieNanner
(15,154 posts)But I don't think he will resign.
Hope you are right.
malaise
(269,174 posts)There is a clear law re property. Bye bye uncle Thomas- good effin riddance.
Ocelot II
(115,858 posts)What we really need is disclosure laws with big, sharp, teeth. As far as I can tell, there are currently no felony disclosure laws. If all he can be busted for is what's basically a misdemeanor, the fact that what he did was absolutely egregious and despicably dishonest and unethical won't make much difference.
Seriously - despite the claims in the video, its hardly the only time that a judge has violated the law.
Violations range from jaywalking to murder. This isnt one that plausibly results in bye bye CT no matter how much gravity the host adds to his voice
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)As a little kid I watched Huntley-Brinkley, and sometimes Cronkite.
Helps me get a feel for the stories that are getting covered outside the cable news bubble.
Pretty damning report tonight on ABC's World News Tonight w/David Muir. Led off the show.
The heat is definitely being turned up on Clarence Thomas.
Decades too late, but he seems to be in real trouble.
malaise
(269,174 posts)Down he goes at last
Beachnutt
(7,341 posts)Pick
✌🏻
leftieNanner
(15,154 posts)If we get feinstein back on the Judiciary committee.
Response to leftieNanner (Reply #21)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
2naSalit
(86,794 posts)Beautiful Disaster
(667 posts)It isn't happening.
calguy
(5,326 posts)But the man has no shame, and his republican puppet masters won't allow him to resign with a Democratic President and Senate.
So in the end, ain't nothing gonna happen.
lastlib
(23,288 posts)Sad, but true. Resignation is the only option.
dem4decades
(11,304 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,567 posts)spooky3
(34,481 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,567 posts)Cha
(297,692 posts)Chief Justice Roberts.
TY & Sen Whitehouse!
FAFO uncle thomas & tea bag ginni.
Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)- that he shares with Alito - dating back to his confirmation hearings.
Even if impeached, there aren't enough Senate Republicans to get the 66 votes needed to convict/remove him. I don't think there are enough Rs who would vote to convict and remove him even if he was first convicted of a felony in a criminal court.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,657 posts)On Thomass benefactors.
I think a select senate investigation committee should make Clarence and Ginni so radioactive that his Nazi pal, or anyone else, wont even treat him to a Starbucks latte.
Then make a criminal referral to DOJ
Cha
(297,692 posts)malaise
(269,174 posts)Sweating about now
Great toon 😀😀
ShazzieB
(16,529 posts)I'm afraid to get my hopes up just yet, but I do like the direction this is heading in!
cilla4progress
(24,772 posts)too.
Silent3
(15,273 posts)...would get rid of Thomas.
If we regain the House and keep the Senate next election, no way we'll reach 2/3 to remove Thomas in the Senate.
If you think he can be shamed into resigning, I want some of what you're smoking.
Response to Silent3 (Reply #41)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Silent3
(15,273 posts)...but that's not at all the same thing as saying "Bye bye Uncle Thomas" like there's actually any realistic chance of Thomas resigning or being forcibly ousted.
I'm long past having any hope of Republican's joining Democrats when it's merely the right thing to do if what's needed would diminish Republican power or upset "the base".
Response to Silent3 (Reply #45)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Kid Berwyn
(14,964 posts)The NAZI buff financed a millionaire lifestyle for Long Dong Silver.
Historic.
malaise
(269,174 posts)Kid Berwyn
(14,964 posts)Inquiring minds need to know
Missed connections and forgotten history from before Clarence Thomas ascended to the Supreme Court:
Judge Thomas's South Africa Connection Needs Clarification
Opinion / LTTE
The New York Times
To the Editor:
Judge Clarence Thomas, President Bush's Supreme Court nominee, has had a disturbing record of affiliations and joint activities with lobbyists for the South African Government, which Congress should explore in his confirmation hearings. The most important of these lobbyists are Jay Parker and William Keyes. According to filings with the Department of Justice, Mr. Parker was registered as an agent of South Africa's Transkei bantustan, or tribal homeland, in 1977-78 and was the official agent of another South African bantustan, Venda, 1981-85. In 1985, Mr. Parker and Mr. Keyes incorporated International Public Affairs Consultants, registered as a lobbying agency for the South African Government, receiving $360,000 a year, plus expenses.
In 1977-78, when Mr. Parker first served as a South African agent, he organized the Lincoln Institute for Research and Education, which issued the quarterly Lincoln Review. The institute and review have consistently attacked the African National Congress, sanctions against South Africa and the United States civil rights movement's leadership and ideas.
Mr. Parker and Clarence Thomas served on the Reagan-Bush transition team for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, of which Mr. Thomas became commissioner in June 1982. Since 1981, Mr. Thomas has been listed as an editorial advisory board member of Mr. Parker's Lincoln Review. Mr. Keyes has been a contributing editor. Registration filings under the heading "political propaganda" show International Public Affairs Consultants held a reception for its South African client's Ambassador in 1987, when Pretoria was vigorously fighting sanctions. Mr. Thomas, then E.E.O.C. chairman, was listed as in attendance.
In 1984, Mr. Keyes organized Black PAC, Mr. Parker serving as treasurer. This political-action committee worked hard for the re-election of Senator Jesse Helms in 1984, while strongly opposing the "terrorist outlaw" African National Congress and "extremists" like Jesse Jackson and the Congressional Black Caucus.
In June 1987, the conservative weekly Human Events reported that the leaders of Black PAC were holding a strategy meeting that month "to plan for the important political battles being waged in Congress," those to attend including Clarence Pendleton, President Reagan's chairman of the Civil Rights Commission, and Clarence Thomas of the E.E.O.C.
It is not certain that these two top black officials in the Reagan Administration attended the strategy meeting that was organized by two paid lobbyists for a foreign (and racist) government, but this is something that the confirmation hearings should clarify.
EDWARD S. HERMAN
Narberth, Pa., Aug. 29, 1991
The writer (was) professor emeritus of finance, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.
A version of this article appears in print on Sept. 8, 1991, Section
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/1991/09/08/opinion/l-judge-thomas-s-south-africa-connection-needs-clarification-858891.html
Thats some of the missing historical context on Clarence Thomas, Esq.
electric_blue68
(14,941 posts)malaise
(269,174 posts)Big time
Paladin
(28,273 posts)Nice image of the two. Thanks.
Kid Berwyn
(14,964 posts)A couple develop tastes for the finer things, like the Michaela Rose
The Haves and the Have-Yachts
Luxury ships attract outrage and political scrutiny. The ultra-rich are buying them in record numbers.
By Evan Osnos
The New Yorker, July 18, 2022
In the Victorian era, it was said that the length of a mans boat, in feet, should match his age, in years. The Victorians would have had some questions at the fortieth annual Palm Beach International Boat Show, which convened this March on Floridas Gold Coast. A typical offering: a two-hundred-and-three-foot superyacht named Sea Owl, selling secondhand for ninety million dollars. The owner, Robert Mercer, the hedge-fund tycoon and Republican donor, was throwing in furniture and accessories, including several auxiliary boats, a Steinway piano, a variety of frescoes, and a security system that requires fingerprint recognition. Nevertheless, Mercers package was a modest one; the largest superyachts are more than five hundred feet, on a scale with naval destroyers, and cost six or seven times what he was asking.
Excerpt
OShannassy has come to see big boats as a space where powerful solar systems converge and combine. It is implicit in every interaction that their sharing of information will benefit both parties; it is an obsession with billionaires to do favours for each other. A referral, an introduction, an insightit all matters, he wrote in Superyacht Captain, a new memoir. A guest told OShannassy that, after a lavish display of hospitality, he finally understood the business case for buying a boat. One deal secured on board will pay it all back many times over, the guest said, and it is pretty hard to say no after your kids have been hosted so well for a week.
Continues
Source: The New Yorker
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2022/07/25/the-haves-and-the-have-yachts
Same can be said for investing in the corruption of an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court. It pays back big time.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Besides, I'm busy in the back counting my chickens.