Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SoGood Effin'Grief Chris Jansing Democrats are not in a 50-50 tie plus the Vice President (Original Post) malaise Apr 2023 OP
And what does this refer to? brooklynite Apr 2023 #1
I think this is because Feinstein is out Wishful-Thinking Apr 2023 #2
So is McConnell right now Bev54 Apr 2023 #9
Yes, and at the time Fetterman, but that wasn't the issue. Wishful-Thinking Apr 2023 #10
There are 18 nominations that were approved by the Committee before Feinstein's absence onenote Apr 2023 #12
Government is too complicated for her. LiberalFighter Apr 2023 #3
That person from AZ went Indy....... Lovie777 Apr 2023 #4
She said 50-50 malaise Apr 2023 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author malaise Apr 2023 #7
Makes one wonder about these hosts sometimes. One of the biggest story lines of the '22 election... brush Apr 2023 #5
Remember snowybirdie Apr 2023 #8
the numbers: onenote Apr 2023 #11

Wishful-Thinking

(109 posts)
10. Yes, and at the time Fetterman, but that wasn't the issue.
Mon Apr 17, 2023, 03:59 PM
Apr 2023

Problem is getting nominations out of the Judiciary Committee that needs Feinstein’s vote to pass a judge to full Senate for vote.

onenote

(42,767 posts)
12. There are 18 nominations that were approved by the Committee before Feinstein's absence
Mon Apr 17, 2023, 05:32 PM
Apr 2023

Last edited Tue Apr 18, 2023, 01:15 AM - Edit history (1)

that haven't been moved to the floor. Committee hearings on nominations (which is a necessary predicate for a committee vote) are being held in her absence. Name one nominee that hasn't been confirmed because of her absence.

Lovie777

(12,329 posts)
4. That person from AZ went Indy.......
Fri Apr 14, 2023, 02:00 PM
Apr 2023

p.s. I believe it would Dems 50, F up party 49, don't know which way AZ lady going - 1...........

Response to Lovie777 (Reply #4)

brush

(53,871 posts)
5. Makes one wonder about these hosts sometimes. One of the biggest story lines of the '22 election...
Fri Apr 14, 2023, 02:02 PM
Apr 2023

was Sen. Warnock beating Herschel Walker in Georgia, making the Dem advantage in the US Senate 51 to 49 seats. You'd think she's remember that.

Somw rhwaw hosts are not exactly Rachel Maddow.

onenote

(42,767 posts)
11. the numbers:
Mon Apr 17, 2023, 04:25 PM
Apr 2023

Democrats: 48
Republicans 49
Independents: 3

Of the three independents, two (Sanders and King) are said to "caucus" with the Democrats. The third (Sinema) says she isn't caucusing with either party but also has said she is "formally aligned" with the Democrats for committee purposes. (Not sure how that differs from caucusing with the Democrats).

Moreover, for the important purpose of voting on Biden's judicial nominees, none of the 48 Democrats and 3 independents have voted against any of those nominees during the 118th Congress (22 confirmations). On the other hand, in 19 of the 22 confirmation votes, at least two (and as many as ten) Republicans have affirmatively voted for Biden's nominee. Harris has had to break a tie in only two of the nominations considered so far this Congress (two of the three in which no Republican supported Biden's nominee).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SoGood Effin'Grief Chris ...