General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDemocrats Worry Crackdown on TikTok Could Hurt Party
Democrats Worry Crackdown on TikTok Could Hurt Party
April 16, 2023 at 7:28 am EDT By Taegan Goddard 188 Comments
https://politicalwire.com/2023/04/16/democrats-worry-crackdown-on-tiktok-could-hurt-party/
"SNIP........
Washington Post: Democrats have so successfully cultivated TikTok clout and the soapbox it provides for young voters in contrast to Republicans far less enthusiastic embrace that party operatives are now drawing up detailed plans to dramatically expand its use in the 2024 campaign.
But that strategy is colliding head-on with the Biden administrations push to crack down on TikTok. Fearing that the apps Chinese ownership could pose a security threat, the administration, through a powerful interagency committee, is pushing a plan that would require TikToks Chinese owners to divest from the popular video app.
.........SNIP"
David__77
(24,859 posts)And further, its doomed to failure.
cilla4progress
(26,526 posts)Ruby red state.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/tylerroush/2023/04/15/montana-bans-tiktok-heres-why-its-probably-unenforceable/
The Montana House voted Friday to approve a bill banning TikTok in the state, the first of its kind in the U.S.though its unclear how the state would be able to ever enforce such a ban.
David__77
(24,859 posts)
dchill
(42,660 posts)(Bitter sarcasm OFF.)
pinkstarburst
(2,077 posts)PortTack
(35,824 posts)Millennial voters!
Igel
(37,613 posts)to provide potential foes with a hell of a lot of rope.
"The capitalists will sell us the rope with which to hang them," allegedly said Lenin.
I've seriously respected the rare juror who said, "I think this decision should go this way, in favor of the defendant. But I have to say that case law and the text of the law mandates I find in favor of the plaintiff. That said, I decide this on the basis of case law and statute."
When a judge really dislikes his/her decision because it's morally offensive *but* in line with case law and the textual basis of the law, it means that judge democracy.
Any democratic politician should be willing, in a republic, to do what's best for the nation even if a lot of people are against it because what's more important--the republic or the chances of being re-elected?
Those things are not always the same. "What's best for the republic is what the majority wants." Yeah, like hell. Reps might be wrong, but the majority is fairly often not-right. They lack the necessary information, education, time for analysis that those appointed to know, be trained, and have the time and be able to draw on expertise have. (Otherwise we'd have fought WWII by referendum.)
WarGamer
(18,859 posts)Celerity
(54,868 posts)Kohn-Murphy and Victor Shi, strategy director for Voters of Tomorrow, a group also aimed at Gen Z, said numerous Democratic campaigns have expressed interest in cultivating relationships with creators of TikTok content, building on the 2020 and 2022 election cycles. For any campaign that wants to get their message out to young people, I dont think you can do that without TikTok, Shi said.
Thats where the potential problems come in for Democrats, whose reliance on younger voters has only become greater with the ascendance of politically potent issues such as abortion rights, climate change, racial equity and gun control.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.