General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIowa to spend millions kicking families off food stamps. More states may follow.
TAMA, Iowa As an icy prairie wind slapped down on the empty town, Lisa Spitler pulled on winter gloves, grabbed a clipboard and started walking toward the cars idling outside the fire station. In two hours, a mobile food pantry would begin a free food distribution. The line of early arrivals already stretched a half-mile to where it dead-ends in this town of 3,000 residents east of Des Moines.
The outreach director for several of the regions food banks, Spitlers job was to connect hungry families with the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the federal governments most effective food assistance pipeline. She covered 28 counties across Iowas northeast corner. Spitler was there to see if SNAP could help, offering herself as a guide through the maze of bureaucratic forms and eligibility requirements.
-snip-
The state legislature, with the support of the Republican supermajority, was poised to approve some of the nations harshest restrictions on SNAP. They include asset tests and new eligibility guidelines. By the states own estimate, Iowa will need to spend nearly $18 million in administrative costs during the first three years to take in less federal money. The bills backers argue the steps would save the state money long term and cut down on SNAP fraud.
-snip-
Enacting the bill is expected to cost Iowa more than $17 million in the first three years, far more than the $2.2 million the state spends each year to administer SNAP. (The federal government funds SNAP and splits administrative costs 50-50 with the state. Last year, Iowa received $60.4 million in federal SNAP funds).
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/04/16/iowa-snap-restrictions-food-stamps/
Brilliant!
Midnight Writer
(25,724 posts)Guess farm income is not a big issue in Iowa.
mopinko
(73,909 posts)thats why its a usda program. idiots.
TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts)Buckeyeblue
(6,436 posts)I think $1 in food assistance created like a $1.50 in downstream revenue. Food assistance doesn't just help those in need but it helps the grocery stores and their suppliers as well.
I can't imagine a policy that denies the hungry food being good for anyone.
Walleye
(45,385 posts)The Republicans are so delusional these days we cant expect them to think
dflprincess
(29,417 posts)the cruelty is the point.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)Phoenix61
(18,887 posts)Its one thing to sell your food stamps at 50 cents on the dollar. Its quite another to give away your card to someone you dont know. So now its a program with relatively little fraud because, go figure, hungry people buy food.
Matthew28
(1,883 posts)I hate these cruel inhuman pieces of shit.
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)dalton99a
(95,210 posts)RANDYWILDMAN
(3,179 posts)at all !
Fuck you Chuck Grassley and all iowa trumpers....
oasis
(53,957 posts)tenderfoot
(8,982 posts)iemanja
(57,779 posts)as others here have noted many times. They want to do harm to the poor and will spend any amount of money to make that happen.
elocs
(24,486 posts)This is so much about the resentment of the right, that somebody might get a benefit that they don't qualify to receive.
I am a retired and poor senior citizen and I see no reason why the poor should not be a diligent as the wealthy in getting any and every benefit for which they are entitled to receive.
But Republicans have no problem in going after the little any individual poor person or family gets while lusting after more tax breaks for the already wealthy.
XanaDUer2
(15,772 posts)Don't vote Republican
