Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(137,318 posts)
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 09:01 PM Apr 2023

Iowa to spend millions kicking families off food stamps. More states may follow.

TAMA, Iowa — As an icy prairie wind slapped down on the empty town, Lisa Spitler pulled on winter gloves, grabbed a clipboard and started walking toward the cars idling outside the fire station. In two hours, a mobile food pantry would begin a free food distribution. The line of early arrivals already stretched a half-mile to where it dead-ends in this town of 3,000 residents east of Des Moines.

The outreach director for several of the region’s food banks, Spitler’s job was to connect hungry families with the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the federal government’s most effective food assistance pipeline. She covered 28 counties across Iowa’s northeast corner. Spitler was there to see if SNAP could help, offering herself as a guide through the maze of bureaucratic forms and eligibility requirements.

-snip-

The state legislature, with the support of the Republican supermajority, was poised to approve some of the nation’s harshest restrictions on SNAP. They include asset tests and new eligibility guidelines. By the state’s own estimate, Iowa will need to spend nearly $18 million in administrative costs during the first three years — to take in less federal money. The bill’s backers argue the steps would save the state money long term and cut down on “SNAP fraud.”

-snip-

Enacting the bill is expected to cost Iowa more than $17 million in the first three years, far more than the $2.2 million the state spends each year to administer SNAP. (The federal government funds SNAP and splits administrative costs 50-50 with the state. Last year, Iowa received $60.4 million in federal SNAP funds).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/04/16/iowa-snap-restrictions-food-stamps/

Brilliant!

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Midnight Writer

(25,724 posts)
1. SNAP also benefits farmers. It means more people buying their products.
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 09:20 PM
Apr 2023

Guess farm income is not a big issue in Iowa.

Buckeyeblue

(6,436 posts)
2. And there is the downstream impacts to stores and suppliers
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 09:23 PM
Apr 2023

I think $1 in food assistance created like a $1.50 in downstream revenue. Food assistance doesn't just help those in need but it helps the grocery stores and their suppliers as well.

I can't imagine a policy that denies the hungry food being good for anyone.

Walleye

(45,385 posts)
3. I have a hard time believing that children are committing fraud to get food
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 09:24 PM
Apr 2023

The Republicans are so delusional these days we can’t expect them to think

Phoenix61

(18,887 posts)
6. If there was fraud it resolved when they went to the debit cards.
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 09:41 PM
Apr 2023

It’s one thing to sell your food stamps at 50 cents on the dollar. It’s quite another to give away your card to someone you don’t know. So now it’s a program with relatively little fraud because, go figure, hungry people buy food.

RANDYWILDMAN

(3,179 posts)
11. proving again and again republicans DON"T care about people
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 10:39 PM
Apr 2023

at all !

Fuck you Chuck Grassley and all iowa trumpers....

iemanja

(57,779 posts)
14. The goal is cruelty
Sun Apr 16, 2023, 11:13 PM
Apr 2023

as others here have noted many times. They want to do harm to the poor and will spend any amount of money to make that happen.

 

elocs

(24,486 posts)
15. Iowa will be Iowa.
Mon Apr 17, 2023, 03:02 AM
Apr 2023

This is so much about the resentment of the right, that somebody might get a benefit that they don't qualify to receive.

I am a retired and poor senior citizen and I see no reason why the poor should not be a diligent as the wealthy in getting any and every benefit for which they are entitled to receive.
But Republicans have no problem in going after the little any individual poor person or family gets while lusting after more tax breaks for the already wealthy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Iowa to spend millions ki...