Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Firebirds01

(576 posts)
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 12:44 PM Nov 2012

Could Obama by himself decriminalize pot?

Forgive me I dont know the ins-and-outs of drug reform. It is my understanding that marijuana was made a Schedule I drug by Nixon and Schedule I is for the most serious drugs. Could Obama remove it lower is schedule/decriminalize it. Or is that a congress thing? Is his only option just to tell the justice department to not worry about it as much.


Thanks much everyone.

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Could Obama by himself decriminalize pot? (Original Post) Firebirds01 Nov 2012 OP
no struggle4progress Nov 2012 #1
I guess you forgot Iggy Nov 2012 #2
No "would" Firebirds01 Nov 2012 #5
Even if Obama "could" Iggy Nov 2012 #6
To my knowledge, yes. Le Taz Hot Nov 2012 #3
Great Point Iggy Nov 2012 #7
yes Enrique Nov 2012 #4
His first important step would be to have pot taken off the Schedule I list. ancianita Nov 2012 #8
Technically yes, but I don't expect it to happen. Removing it from Schedule I might. HopeHoops Nov 2012 #9
Since we're discussing Nixon and weed, this thread needs a soundtrack . . Strelnikov_ Nov 2012 #10
IIRC the Federal prohibition lies in 2 areas hootinholler Nov 2012 #11
 

Iggy

(1,418 posts)
2. I guess you forgot
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 12:48 PM
Nov 2012

Obama laughed out loud at the suggestion of decriminalization a few months ago.. I think we know why

 

Iggy

(1,418 posts)
6. Even if Obama "could"
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 12:56 PM
Nov 2012

He's not going to... again, the laughing at the prospect of even discussing this with the president of Columbia is a pretty good hint regarding where this is on Obama's priority list.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
3. To my knowledge, yes.
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 12:50 PM
Nov 2012

The history as to how this got to be a Schedule I is interesting. Richard Nixon commissioned a study on the effects of marijuana. When the commission's report came back it stated that marijuana was basically harmless. This pissed off Nixon who cajoled Congress to give the President scheduling power (alongside the FDA). Once granted, he placed cannabis as a Schedule I drug. Given the history, I would imagine that whatever the President giveth, the President can also taketh away, or in this case, at least reschedule.

Legal eagles will need to weight in on this one.

 

Iggy

(1,418 posts)
7. Great Point
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 12:58 PM
Nov 2012

and Nixon commissioned this study wanting to "prove once and for all" that pot is very harmful.

FAIL.

ancianita

(43,307 posts)
8. His first important step would be to have pot taken off the Schedule I list.
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 12:58 PM
Nov 2012

Legal change could proceed from there.

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
9. Technically yes, but I don't expect it to happen. Removing it from Schedule I might.
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 01:23 PM
Nov 2012

That doesn't on its own make it legal, but it would release the states to their own decisions under the 10th Amendment. It doesn't even belong in the CSA Nixon implemented. Technically all Schedule I status does is prevent physicians from prescribing it. Just dropping it to Schedule II would allow medical use throughout the country. It honestly doesn't belong on the list under any of the CSA schedules. Any step forward is progress.

hootinholler

(26,451 posts)
11. IIRC the Federal prohibition lies in 2 areas
Sat Nov 10, 2012, 01:50 PM
Nov 2012

First there is the drugs schedule. It needs to be reclassified or removed from the schedule.

Second I think the law states there is a stamp required to produce or sell it. (I'm going from memory here) The stamp has never been issued for sale.

Given those 2 things, I think it is possible for the executive branch to deal with it.

It should be unconstitutional for congress to pass a tax stamp law and never issue the stamp or issue it in small quantities.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Could Obama by himself de...