Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAlaska Supreme Court, in landmark ruling, says partisan gerrymandering violates state constitution
https://www.adn.com/politics/2023/04/21/alaska-supreme-court-in-landmark-decision-rules-that-partisan-gerrymandering-is-unconstitutional/In a landmark decision, the Alaska Supreme Court ruled Friday that partisan gerrymandering is unconstitutional under the Alaska Constitutions equal protection doctrine.
The decision follows a contentious recent reapportionment cycle: The Alaska Redistricting Board was twice found by the states highest court of having unconstitutionally gerrymandered the states political maps by attempting to give solidly Republican Eagle River more political representation with two Senate seats. Following a court order, the board approved an interim map last year for Novembers general election that kept Eagle River intact in one Senate district.
The court ruled Friday that the redistricting board would have 90 days to appear before a Superior Court judge and show cause why the interim political map should not be used until the 2032 general election. A board meeting hasnt been scheduled yet to discuss the courts decision, but that could happen as soon as next week.
John Binkley, chair of the Alaska Redistricting Board, said that the five-member board would need to carefully consider the courts ruling, and that members would likely hear public testimony before deciding how to proceed. Binkley said he was personally satisfied with the interim political map, and the process he oversaw to redraw Alaskas political boundaries.
*snip*
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Alaska Supreme Court, in landmark ruling, says partisan gerrymandering violates state constitution (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Apr 2023
OP
Cha
(319,067 posts)1. Wow... TY & Alaskan SC
jimfields33
(19,382 posts)4. It seems odd that they can't figure out their ONE house district.
Isnt the senate seats statewide too?
dsc
(53,395 posts)6. they are referring to the state assembly
Bev54
(13,431 posts)2. Times seem to be changing.
electric_blue68
(26,856 posts)3. Oh, ok!
Marthe48
(23,174 posts)5. In ohio
the state Supreme Court twice told the r fascist supermajority that the lines they drew are unconstitutional. The r fascist majority screwed around until they said they couldn't change them for the midterm 2018, then screwed around some more until they couldn't change them for 2020, or 2022 and now somehow the s.c. has shifted to a r fascist majority, and you can bet the unconstitutional gerrymanderd districts aren't going anywhere. So expect that p.o.s gym to be a fixture in D.C. and john david bowman, aka j.d.vance (barf) as well.
I can't wait to see what Alaska does. Maybe Dems in Ohio will be able to borrow any positive action, and get our state back.
TomDaisy
(2,120 posts)7. Greg Abbott won't like this