General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI believe you E. Jean Carroll!
And I have so much respect for your courage!
You go girl! I for one believe you will win.
mobeau69
(11,156 posts)being repetitive in his cross. Objections made all throughout the questioning and the judge overruled nearly all of them.
Source: Joy Reids guest tonight that was in the courtroom.
mysteryowl
(7,396 posts)rsdsharp
(9,202 posts)mobeau69
(11,156 posts)Wishful-Thinking
(109 posts)Just heard today on Legal AF (one of the Meidas podcasts) that one of the 9 jurors is a 31 year old white guy who listens to right wing podcasts for his news. It only takes one. If E Jeannes attorneys let him through, imagine how the ones that were discharged looked.
mysteryowl
(7,396 posts)rsdsharp
(9,202 posts)mysteryowl
(7,396 posts)Beakybird
(3,333 posts)mysteryowl
(7,396 posts)rsdsharp
(9,202 posts)Disagreement by jury. (a) Unanimous verdict not required. A verdict may be rendered by not less than five-sixths of the jurors constituting a jury.
Beakybird
(3,333 posts)rsdsharp
(9,202 posts)Heres Fed R Civ Pro 48
a) Number of Jurors. A jury must begin with at least 6 and no more than 12 members, and each juror must participate in the verdict unless excused under Rule 47(c).
(b) Verdict. Unless the parties stipulate otherwise, the verdict must be unanimous and must be returned by a jury of at least 6 members.
Ive read that they can return a verdict with 7 members, but I dont know if thats true. I cant find a stipulation to that.
Beakybird
(3,333 posts)rsdsharp
(9,202 posts)Judge Kaplan was appointed by Bill Clinton. I just screwed up.
robbob
(3,538 posts)(Sorry, couldnt resist ) 😁
RussBLib
(9,036 posts)7.4 is 5/6 of 9, so I believe you could rule for Carroll with 8 of 9 votes. 7 isn't enough if your pool is 9.
Beakybird
(3,333 posts)rsdsharp
(9,202 posts)unless the parties stipulate that it doesnt.
RussBLib
(9,036 posts)...because the New York state legislature changed their statute of limitations law giving rape victims more time to bring suit? Seems like if a state lege did that, it should be brought in state court. ??
I don't care as long as his ass gets nailed. While Carroll was testifying in court, Trump is out campaigning in New Hampshire. So busy he is.
New state law extends the statute of limitations for rape in New York
9/18/2019
Under the new law, the statute of limitations for reporting second-degree rape increases to 20 years and third-degree rape increases to 10 years. Previously, both were five years.
There has been an ongoing and pervasive culture of sexual harassment and abuse in our society, and it is made worse by the fact that victims of second- and third-degree rape only have five years to bring a legal claim against their attacker, Cuomo said in a statement. Five years is an insult to these survivors and today were providing them more time to come to terms with the trauma they experienced and to seek justice.
The law eliminates the statute of limitations for incest in the first degree, and extends the statute to 20 years for incest in the second degree and for a second-degree criminal sexual act. For third-degree criminal sex acts, the statute of limitations is increased to 10 years.
And under the law, victims now have 20 years in which to bring a civil suit for the offenses.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/18/us/new-york-law-rape-statute-of-limitations-extended/index.html
rsdsharp
(9,202 posts)I screwed up. Mea culpa.
Tree Lady
(11,498 posts)about political beliefs and such to the jurors?
Wishful-Thinking
(109 posts)Thursday April 27 edition called Trump Lawyers Getting Crushed and Jack Smith Soars. This is two well informed lawyers talking about the case and the issues we have all been tossing around here. Its free on Apple Podcast and I think on YouTube as well.
Michael Popok and former top Manhattan DA prosecutor Karen Friedman Agnifilo discuss: 1. Days 1 and 2 of the E Jean Carroll federal case against Donald Trump;
LoisB
(7,231 posts)walkingman
(7,667 posts)BOSSHOG
(37,099 posts)But I often pray that Justice comes to bad people.
dlk
(11,578 posts)You can see it in her eyes. That and Trump is a known sexual predator who jokes about having sex with his daughter.
yardwork
(61,710 posts)tavernier
(12,401 posts)I heard that she said that she watched trumps show on TV because she thought it was clever for them to produce a show like that. If I had been raped by Trump, theres no way I would spend one second of time ever ever ever watching his horrible show.
Sorry. Shes probably telling the truth but she and I are two different people, and I could never watch his show having gone through what she went through.
ExWhoDoesntCare
(4,741 posts)About someone who was robbed, but still watches cop shows after it?
I always find it telling when people make these sexist assertions about "would anyone do X" when it comes to rape victims, but never about victims of other crimes.
Maybe you need to examine why you so readily went for that particular rape justification.
tavernier
(12,401 posts)when I was in high school. I wasnt raped but only because I physically fought them off and I think they knew I would end up screaming and bringing in everyone in the house. I never told anyone but my best friend, but I could never look at or speak to them again. I sure as hell would never have had anything to do with either one again even if they were both crowned King of England.
UTUSN
(70,741 posts)Meowmee
(5,164 posts)I hope she wins.