Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWe Need To Abolish The "Exonerative Tense" Of Headlines
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/emersonmalone/police-traffic-safety-headline-language-exoneration*snip*
When a violent crime becomes breaking news, police often are wrong, or they lie. Even in the best cases, the statements put out by police departments push an agenda through how they use language: the so-called past exonerative tense.
From the copaganda marketing term officer-involved shooting to the politician fave mistakes were made, exonerative language deflects whose fault it is, absolving anyone of accountability and employing the passive voice to misleading ends. Its also just confusing. In the midst of a scandal, mistakes were made conveniently clears the air of any tangible wrongdoing. The past exonerative tense, a phrase coined by political scientist William Schneider, is called that because culpability is impossible when actions no longer exist, Vijith Assar writes for McSweeneys, adding that its the ultimate in passive voice.
You can expect to run into the exonerative tense like clockwork. An editor might use it in a headline (the first, and often only, part of a story a reader sees). The phrasing, some argue, can reinforce the normalcy of police violence, white supremacy, and toxic car culture. A news release or poorly worded article can make a violent police officer seem innocent, minimize intimate partner violence, acquit a negligent driver, and make the people at the heart of a crime curiously exempt from blame. The exonerative tense makes a horrific incident like the murder of George Floyd appear to be tedious and insignificant. Ambiguous grammar can be insidious.
Another example of this semantic gymnastics: In March last year, an Alabama news outlet initially ran a story headlined Scottsboro officer killed, wife critically injured after shooting before updating it to the more straightforward Scottsboro officer shoots wife, kills himself.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 693 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (7)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
We Need To Abolish The "Exonerative Tense" Of Headlines (Original Post)
Nevilledog
May 2023
OP
Lovie777
(12,374 posts)1. Lawsuit.......................
yonder
(9,683 posts)2. Not quite the same but related:
When a public official, wealthy person, cop, etc. is arrested and/or found to be in possession of a bunch of guns or ammo that is characterized as a collection.
However, when Bubba is pulled out of his trailer and arrested, that same collection is called an arsenal.
go figure.