General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRomney Laments That Democrats Didn't Raise The Debt Ceiling Themselves Before His Party Got Involved
Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) bemoaned Thursday that Democrats didnt just raise the debt ceiling themselves before Republicans got their grubby mitts on it.
Dont forget that that could have been solved a long time ago by our Democrat friends simply in their reconciliation bill doing what Leader McConnell asked them to do, which is just raise the debt ceiling yourselves didnt need a single Republican vote, not a single vote! Romney exclaimed at a Senate Budget Committee hearing. But they chose not to because politicking is the way of this city and it makes the American people sick frankly, it makes a number of us who serve in these positions a little ill as well.
Lets break this down.
Romney is arguing that Democrats let politics get in the way of raising the debt ceiling last congressional term, since they could have raised it with a bare majority. And thats probably true! At least on paper, Democrats had the votes, but they didnt want to be saddled with (false) Republican attacks that theyd ballooned the debt.
It was also political motivation that prevented Republicans from voting with Democrats to raise the debt ceiling then, the better to either attack them by conflating raising the debt ceiling with enormous spending, or to preserve leverage for a later date.
Distilled, Romneys message is this: Darn you Democrats for not taking care of the debt ceiling then, because you knew wed refuse to raise the limit unless you conceded to our demands, and look what a sticky spot were in now.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/romney-debt-ceiling-democrats
Democrats are forcing us to shoot the hostage and destroy the country's and the world's economy -- that's the Republican spin.
Mad_Machine76
(24,447 posts)Manchin and/or Sinema prevented such a move. Although, of course, if Romney and a few other Republicans pushed the issue, it could have been resolved, right?
brush
(53,925 posts)Sinema/Manchin faction.
The Unmitigated Gall
(3,837 posts)Always WILL be a weasel.
no_hypocrisy
(46,243 posts)Republicans are mad at Democrats for not saving them from themselves.
I care what Romney thinks or says about as much as I do about what any other republican half wit thinks or says. Which is ZERO!
apnu
(8,759 posts)AllaN01Bear
(18,565 posts)Raven123
(4,889 posts)BlueTsunami2018
(3,505 posts)How does it let them off the hook?
It lets them blow up the economy and blame it on the Democrats.
They should have eliminated it altogether. Its stupid and pointless.
Raven123
(4,889 posts)liberalmediaaddict
(772 posts)The majority of Democrats were sounding the alarm about the need to lift the debt ceiling before Republicans took back the House. But they couldn't get around "Mr. Bipartisan" Joe Manchin.
I'm sure Sinema would have tried to block it too.
BlueTsunami2018
(3,505 posts)Whether it was Traitor Joe Lieberman under Obama or the Greatest Democrat Ever️ Manchin now, theres always someone throwing a wrench in the works.
Its just infuriating.
JHB
(37,163 posts)...to fix us, while "reasonable" Republicans like me sit back and let them do all the work, because we're their betters and they should know their place."
Fullduplexxx
(7,872 posts)But they chose not to because politicking is the way of this city and it makes the American people sick"
THEN WHY DO YOU DO IT YOU ENORMOUS POMPASS HORSE'S ASS
In It to Win It
(8,296 posts)I'm guessing politics stopped him.
keep_left
(1,793 posts)...event it was where he pontificated about how we're all moochers? Romney is supposed to be one of the nice, respectable, moderate Republicans...and even he gets caught on a hidden microphone making snide remarks about the "47% takers"!
Romney is just as willing to destroy whatever is left of the safety net as MTG is. If the country defaults, well, hey, no more "takers"!
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=17766028
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=17838100
Midnight Writer
(21,819 posts)barbtries
(28,815 posts)for operating in good faith. It seems that's the trend.
sick of it.
BlueTsunami2018
(3,505 posts)Operating in good faith only makes sense if you have an opposition that will do the same. We dont. We should never be operating in good faith with these people. We should be as ruthless and cutthroat or even more so than they are.
This isnt a gentlemans agreement, this is a battle for the very soul of the country. And theyre better at it. Theyre winning.
barbtries
(28,815 posts)i'm not going down that road.
BlueTsunami2018
(3,505 posts)The one thing I hate about this party is the unwillingness to do whatever it takes to win. The GOP doesnt care at all about whats seemly, not to mention ethical or even legal. Theyll do anything to get what they want and thats why its only matter of time before they do.
When one side plays by the so-called rules and the other has no rules, the other side always wins.
barbtries
(28,815 posts)LiberalFighter
(51,172 posts)liberalmediaaddict
(772 posts)He said raising the debt limit should be bipartisan. He refused to include it in any budget reconciliation bill or during the lame duck session.
Wonder if he regrets that decision now. I seriously doubt it.