Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPlanned Parenthood wants to pack the court
It is time to expand the court
Link to tweet
https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/planned-parenthood-supreme-court-packing-abortion-rcna84426?cid=sm_npd_ms_tw_ma&taid=6463544be1903a0001907e3e&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
In an interview Sunday with MSNBCs Jen Psaki, the groups CEO and president, Alexis McGill Johnson, said its incredibly important now that we need to see expanded courts, from lower courts all the way up to the Supreme Court.
,,,,Despite the drastic impact it could have on the law, adding seats to the Supreme Court is theoretically straightforward. The number of justices can be changed with legislation, and doesn't require a constitutional amendment. But even if the Democratic Senate majority got on board with such legislation, it would obviously face massive opposition in the Republican-controlled House. Plus, President Joe Biden has opposed the move.....
Underscoring the absurdity of how slight changes in court personnel can upend the law, the paper's authors noted that, had Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg retired before 2015, Merrick Garland been confirmed in 2016, or Justice Amy Coney Barrett not been confirmed in 2020, the median outcome is that Democratic-leaning justices would comprise a majority on the Supreme Court for the first time in 2029 and they would control a majority of the Court for about half of the next century.
,,,Following the original Roe decision, it took decades for the GOP to build the Dobbs court. Now it could take as long to topple it.
Link to tweet
,,,,Despite the drastic impact it could have on the law, adding seats to the Supreme Court is theoretically straightforward. The number of justices can be changed with legislation, and doesn't require a constitutional amendment. But even if the Democratic Senate majority got on board with such legislation, it would obviously face massive opposition in the Republican-controlled House. Plus, President Joe Biden has opposed the move.....
Underscoring the absurdity of how slight changes in court personnel can upend the law, the paper's authors noted that, had Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg retired before 2015, Merrick Garland been confirmed in 2016, or Justice Amy Coney Barrett not been confirmed in 2020, the median outcome is that Democratic-leaning justices would comprise a majority on the Supreme Court for the first time in 2029 and they would control a majority of the Court for about half of the next century.
Link to tweet
,,,Following the original Roe decision, it took decades for the GOP to build the Dobbs court. Now it could take as long to topple it.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Planned Parenthood wants to pack the court (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
May 2023
OP
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,869 posts)1. Democrats are introducing the Judiciary Act to expand the Supreme Court
Hekate
(100,133 posts)2. Works for me
Polybius
(21,902 posts)3. Where are they getting the 2065 number from?
No one will be on the Court in 2065 that's there now.
Maraya1969
(23,497 posts)4. If we get the majority next election will that be enough or do we have to have some super majority?