General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJordan: "The whistleblower does not want testimony to be made available to the Democrats."
Jordan: The whistleblower does not want [testimony] to be made available to the Democrats.
Goldman: The whistleblower doesnt make committee rules.
Link to tweet
Rep. Goldman (D-NY) after Judiciary Chair Jordan blocks Dems seeing witness testimony at Weaponization of the Federal Govt. hearing:
Where is the whistleblower exception in the rules?
Jordan: Its the prerogative of the committee.
Goldman: Its the rules of the House.
............................
I mean WTAF?
Johonny
(20,895 posts)Raven123
(4,877 posts)Ray Bruns
(4,115 posts)It will make us look bad.
Wounded Bear
(58,726 posts)agingdem
(7,863 posts)because Dan Goldman and Debbie Wasserman Shultz will rip their bogus whistleblower testimony to shreds..
spooky3
(34,483 posts)2naSalit
(86,819 posts)His apprenticeship in Congress started out as impeachment counsel, I was thrilled when he won his election.
Why?
Because I knew he would do this relentlessly. I wish we had a whole bunch more like him. If we had five or ten of every stellar Rep. in our caucus, we'd be on our way to cleaning up some shit in this country.
mountain grammy
(26,656 posts)He's so good and yes, relentless.
Rhiannon12866
(206,157 posts)And, having skipped both impeachment hearings, they're totally unaware that he was lead counsel for the first one... Dan Goldman is doing one hell of a job!
canetoad
(17,195 posts)Started making appearances on the MSNBC talk shows; I really enjoy watching and listeneing to him and predict he'll go a long way.
2naSalit
(86,819 posts)Wherever he thinks he's needed. I trust his judgement up to this point.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Take your time, because as it turns out there is just one right answer.
nature-lover
(1,471 posts)The Repubs. have no one of his intellectual caliber.
2naSalit
(86,819 posts)Is there on purpose, to keep jordan in check. Same with all the other incredible people we've seen in the House over the past few years. They all have courage and stamina, it takes a lot to endure the -45 menace and keep us afloat. I see that the ones who are unmoved by the bullshit are strategically seated on Committees where damage can be done. And don't forget fmr. Speaker Pelosi is still there. No doubt she is helping to advise on the finer points of the Constitution that very few understand.
Midnight Writer
(21,815 posts)2naSalit
(86,819 posts)Explaining imaginary numbers.
badhair77
(4,221 posts)then what is the point. The argument stops there. The evidence goes nowhere.
Comfortably_Numb
(3,834 posts)MiHale
(9,786 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,047 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,761 posts)underpants
(182,922 posts)Link to tweet
?s=46&t=3VBm1LJ8j8qLp6JTs_8J2A
Takket
(21,635 posts)Jerry2144
(2,115 posts)Splashing out of his cranium
Rebl2
(13,570 posts)not convinced there is a whistleblower. They will make up crap up and say the whistleblower gave it to them.
Cha
(297,758 posts)Selling SHIT.
TY Rep Goldman!
UTUSN
(70,748 posts)bluestarone
(17,061 posts)DESTROY our democracy. ( no doubt it's their goal) We need to be ready to treat them ALL like we would treat an ISIS member inside our country! (there is no difference)
Chainfire
(17,655 posts)Just take our word for it.
Kennah
(14,323 posts)"The accused does not want the court or jury to see the evidence."
malaise
(269,196 posts)Rules do not apply