Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsConfused? Thought ignorance of the law was not an excuse? wrt Trump classified docs?
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Confused? Thought ignorance of the law was not an excuse? wrt Trump classified docs? (Original Post)
NowsTheTime
May 2023
OP
Me.
(35,454 posts)1. THat's Just For The Lowly
BlueCheeseAgain
(1,983 posts)2. Some laws take into account intent or knowledge of the law.
For classified documents...
Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.
This is likely a big reason why Biden and Pence, for example, are not really at risk of being indicted for having classified docs at their homes.
Other things are illegal whether or not you knew it was illegal-- i.e. driving drunk.
NowsTheTime
(1,328 posts)3. Thanks! Makes sense, and I admit I was confused..