General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge grants request for George Santos's bond sponsors to be unsealed
A federal judge Tuesday granted media organizations requests to unseal the names of the people who cosigned Rep. George Santoss (R-N.Y.) $500,000 bond in his criminal fraud case.
The order is a blow to Santos, whose attorney Monday asked a judge to keep the names of the bond cosigners sealed. The congressmans lawyer, Joseph Murray, expressed concern for the sponsors should their identities be revealed, citing a media frenzy around the Santos case.
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4036947-judge-grants-request-for-george-santoss-bond-sponsors-to-be-unsealed/
Ohio Joe
(21,896 posts)jimfields33
(19,382 posts)Even if little Jimmy got the bail money from parents for theft, the parents names should be known or a bail bondsman company or wherever the money came from.
Ohio Joe
(21,896 posts)I expect that in 99.9% of cases, nobody would care or even bother to look but... In those cases where people do care, I expect it would be in the public interest to have it be public knowledge.
ProfessorGAC
(76,125 posts)In fact, I admit to being confused as to why it is ever non-public information.
I can't see how it negatively impacts the suretor unless they themselves have something to hide.
kimbutgar
(26,984 posts)It would be interesting if the payee had a Russian surname!
Bev54
(13,322 posts)Tetrachloride
(9,488 posts)except when you need money.
erronis
(23,085 posts)since you need to broadcast your good deeds;
except when you need to hide
your affairs and your participation in activities which you publicly deplore
your unreported untaxed financial dealings with russian oligarchs
your lying on multiple forms
your spouses links to anti-democracy groups
your bribes received and kickbacks for "services rendered"
Quakerfriend
(5,882 posts)I didnt see the deadline. By when?
sheshe2
(96,608 posts)Quakerfriend
(5,882 posts)what had originally been decided on last week.
Harker
(17,553 posts)Not to me, anyhow.
I agree!
LetMyPeopleVote
(176,721 posts)Cha
(317,706 posts)The Tweet!
gab13by13
(31,625 posts)there's Leonard Leo of the Federalist Society.
there's Harlan Crow
there's a Koch brother still alive.
there's Putin.
RandySF
(82,143 posts)MayReasonRule
(4,048 posts)RandySF
(82,143 posts)MayReasonRule
(4,048 posts)Any groups or individuals that you'd calculate as more likely than another?
erronis
(23,085 posts)Deriposvka seems to be a constant meddling threat to democracy.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)gopiscrap
(24,593 posts)KPN
(17,201 posts)some distance between them and the bond surety name-wise though. They are pretty practiced at corruption.
Cheezoholic
(3,577 posts)mitch96
(15,718 posts)poli-junkie
(1,506 posts)moondust
(21,257 posts)Blue Owl
(58,599 posts)And fuck Santos -- throw his lying ass in jail
MayReasonRule
(4,048 posts)That's a great bet for fun!!!
SCantiGOP
(14,680 posts)that is was not DJTrump.
MayReasonRule
(4,048 posts)diva77
(7,880 posts)ProfessorGAC
(76,125 posts)A beer type product known for a pronounced hop flavor.
mitch96
(15,718 posts)ProfessorGAC
(76,125 posts)Best ale I ever had was a true cask ale at a pub in Hyde, England. I forget the brewer, but they were local to Manchester.
Fantastic!
I don't drink much, so I prefer NA or Zero beers. I like beer, but don't care for the alcohol buzz.
But, if I could get that ale here, I'd have one every day.
mitch96
(15,718 posts)Fizzy water with pine needles with a bad finish.
I'm now leaning to a lighter lager and my all time fav is Guinness.
Two and I'm done and it has a nice flavor.
I cant remember if it was better in St James Gate or here... All good to me. YMMV
m
diva77
(7,880 posts)SCantiGOP
(14,680 posts)I call it Stinky Beer.
If you have had regular American beer all your life, the IPAs are probably going to be hard to take.
SCantiGOP
(14,680 posts)I call it Stinky Beer.
If you have had regular American beer all your life, the IPAs are probably going to be hard to take.
MayReasonRule
(4,048 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 6, 2023, 07:57 PM - Edit history (1)
It's a tasty beast!!!Come on down y'al! The beer is cold and the food is plenty!!!
Bev54
(13,322 posts)machoneman
(4,128 posts)...some R zillionarie.
NowISeetheLight
(4,002 posts)
Hekate
(100,133 posts)erronis
(23,085 posts)Make me think of when my mother started feeding us kids artichokes. I didn't understand the leafy bits so I just happily scooped the salted butter.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Grins
(9,333 posts)usonian
(24,104 posts)Looks to be an upstanding dude.

One of Guo's and Bannon's projects is the New Federal State of China, which purports to be a government in exile that will take over China once the Chinese Communist Party is overthrown. Prosecutors allege Guo illegally took money from the Rule of Law Foundation and the Rule of Law Society, two nonprofits he founded that have similar policy objectives. (Guo and Bannon have both pleaded not guilty in their respective cases.)
The judge overseeing Guo's case denied giving him bail, siding with prosecutors who argued he was a flight risk because of his vast wealth, ties abroad, and connections to powerful people.
"Miles Guo has been detained since March 15 without bail? The #CCP corruption runs deep," Santos tweeted on May 4, using another one of Guo's many names. (An affinity for using multiple names, which are variations of each other, is something Guo shares with George Anthony Devolder Santos.)
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Surely they posted George's bail out of the goodness of their hearts, and not with any expectation of favorable consideration by a sitting member of Congress.
Right?
barbtries
(31,217 posts)and go away. shoulda done it a long time ago.
mitch96
(15,718 posts)Sneederbunk
(17,351 posts)calimary
(89,294 posts)Well, Im okay with that, too!
VERY okay with that, too. The public deserves to know where those who claim to represent us get their money. Thatll always reveal who those representatives are beholden to.
Pas-de-Calais
(10,269 posts)I really dont know
