General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGrrrrr: Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, initially assigned to oversee his case
The summons sent to former President Donald Trump and his legal team late Thursday indicates that U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon will be assigned to oversee his case, at least initially, according to sources briefed on the matter.
Cannon's apparent assignment would add yet another unprecedented wrinkle to a case involving the first federal charges against a former president: Trump appointed Cannon to the federal bench in 2019, meaning that, if Trump is ultimately convicted, she would be responsible for determining the sentence which may include prison time for the man who elevated her to the role.
A federal grand jury voted to indict Trump on at least seven federal charges late Thursday as part of an investigation into his handling of classified documents, sources familiar with the matter told ABC News. The indictment comes after more than 100 documents with classified markings were found at Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort in August 2022.
Trump has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and claimed again late Thursday that he was innocent.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-aileen-cannon-trump-appointee-initially-assigned-oversee/story?id=99956910
Link to tweet
?s=20
Marius25
(3,213 posts)saying how dare I post something so stupid and she can't possibly get this case.
EYESORE 9001
(29,728 posts)I do question whether this means the rump judge would be presiding over actual proceedings. I read that her name may have been there due to merde-a-logo search warrant.
brer cat
(27,587 posts)VMA131Marine
(5,270 posts)Judges are assigned randomly. Its just an unfortunate coincidence.
getagrip_already
(17,802 posts)That she was assigned because she is familiar with the case and is in the circuit.
It doesn't mean the doj won't object though. They may not.
Surely they knew it was likely. But there must be some recourse.
This will be stopped. Who the hell did this. We know exactly what sentence she will give the orange baboon already. OMG
Jan
hippywife
(22,777 posts)a Rittenhouse type situation due to the judge overseeing the case. She needs to recuse as she's already proved she's definitely in the bag for the former Oaf of Office.
sinkingfeeling
(57,834 posts)atreides1
(16,799 posts)Any bets, on how long it takes her to dismiss the case based on the allegations of prosecutorial misconduct?
Mz Pip
(28,454 posts)Is that even possible?
Marius25
(3,213 posts)Happy Hoosier
(9,535 posts)Marius25
(3,213 posts)Happy Hoosier
(9,535 posts)If she dismisses, DOJ will file an expedited appeal, and she will be overturned.
gab13by13
(32,318 posts)she will delay the trial until after the election.
Explain to me again how her name was randomly drawn, it wasn't randomly drawn the last time, Trump lawyers bypassed the system.
tulipsandroses
(8,251 posts)He is on home turf with a trump friendly judge. If a jury finds him guilty, he cant cry that democrats are treating him unfairly. He will, but..,
Tommy Carcetti
(44,498 posts)Court filings for the arraignment include her name. People assume she's been assigned to hear the arraignment.
The arraignment is in Miami.
Judge Cannon sits in Fort Pierce, which is over 100 miles north of Miami.
It would make no sense for one judge to travel 100 miles down to a place where there are multiple judges available to hear the case.
However, Judge Cannon did notoriously oversee the review of the documents that formed the basis for these charges.
Therefore, it's possible--and likely even, considering the logic of the situation--that her name was included simply because of her prior involvement on the case, not because she's been assigned to hear it.
Electronic court filings typically have a broad service list that includes all lawyers and individuals who have been involved in the case at some point.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)She was assigned the initial case, despite being in Fort Pierce. As a federal judge, she can be assigned to an arraignment in Miami.
gab13by13
(32,318 posts)She wasn't randomly selected the first time.
Tommy Carcetti
(44,498 posts)He's based out of West Palm Beach, the closest SDFL courthouse from Mar a Lago.
Cannon--out of Fort Pierce, another SDFL courthouse but 50 miles north--was the judge assigned when Trump challenged the seizure of the documents. She then assigned the review to a special master, who worked up in New York. Eventually the appeals court dismissed the special master process and that was that.
The SDFL has 5 courthouses--Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Miami and Key West.
Technically proceedings in the SDFL could take place in any one of those courthouses, and that has borne out in this case.
But I don't think they would simply have one judge travel from one courthouse to another to hear an arraignment, especially when there are multiple judges in Miami. Perhaps if it was the other way around, because Fort Pierce is a small outpost while Miami is the main courthouse. But not Fort Pierce to Miami.
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)The 11th Circuit is going to have more fun with her.
And, how much you want to bet that she ends up on the other side of the bench for some reason?
gab13by13
(32,318 posts)her main job will be to delay a trial until after the election, if she is going to be the judge.
It is too unreal if she gets this case.
Johnny2X2X
(24,207 posts)We'll probably learn next week. But she was handling aspects of the case before, so it would be normal for her to be mentioned in the filiings.
honest.abe
(9,238 posts)Bleacher Creature
(11,504 posts)honest.abe
(9,238 posts)You have to read all 4 of her comments to get the full gist.. especially number 4.
Here are comments 2,3 and 4.
2/Altho a judge's behavior in court generally doesn't form the basis for recusal, the 11th Circuit has ordered "reassignment" where a judge leans so heavily for a defendant they call their objectivity in the eyes of the public into question. This is from US v. Martin
3/This is persuasive authority that Judge Cannon must step aside if the case falls to her as a permanent assignment. Her court & certainly the 11th won't tolerate the damage it would do to their credibility if she failed to voluntarily recuse.
4/It is not clear Cannon is permanently assigned to the case. If she is, it's extremely unlikely it stays with her and as a last resort, DOJ will challenge her participation and win.