Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

edhopper

(34,024 posts)
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 12:52 PM Jun 2023

Did TFG disseminate classified intel

Last edited Sun Jun 18, 2023, 06:37 PM - Edit history (1)

to foreign agents or entities? I think is a pretty damn important question that needs to be answered for the public and the country. Not just speculation, but a clear declaration from the DOJ if he did so and the punishment that goes with that.

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did TFG disseminate classified intel (Original Post) edhopper Jun 2023 OP
Of course he did mahina Jun 2023 #1
We both know it edhopper Jun 2023 #2
On the mark! triron Jun 2023 #21
It's a given. dalton99a Jun 2023 #3
You Heard About Smith at the Arraignment Boring Holes into Trump with His Eyes, Right? Beetwasher. Jun 2023 #4
Smith knows what was in the documents too sensitive to use at trial. Qutzupalotl Jun 2023 #8
There are special trials edhopper Jun 2023 #22
Yet he only charged 31 counts out of well over 100 documents. Qutzupalotl Jun 2023 #27
I wonder how... 2naSalit Jun 2023 #5
The question is edhopper Jun 2023 #23
Most likely he did. MineralMan Jun 2023 #6
Outstanding Comment..."This isn't over yet, by any means" Stuart G Jun 2023 #35
. Effete Snob Jun 2023 #7
Hopefully Smith will be able to answer the question Fiendish Thingy Jun 2023 #9
And that's where the road ends ... I don't think there's proof. live love laugh Jun 2023 #10
I think there's proof alright, but the vast majority is too sensitive to be used as evidence. hedda_foil Jun 2023 #13
Hmmmm maybe 🤔 ... that's the ULTIMATE crime to take live love laugh Jun 2023 #16
A majority of the top secret docs seized at Mar-a-Lago are referenced in the indictment. onenote Jun 2023 #28
Recall how his initial actions all Enoki33 Jun 2023 #11
agree republianmushroom Jun 2023 #12
We all know he did. I hope JSmith has the translator for that meeting that trump/putin BComplex Jun 2023 #14
many people believing stopdiggin Jun 2023 #15
I'm curious if H2O Man Jun 2023 #18
my aim there was actually thinking of old guard stopdiggin Jun 2023 #37
Thank you! H2O Man Jun 2023 #38
Yes. H2O Man Jun 2023 #17
If the FBI and CIA wasn't on top of this flamingdem Jun 2023 #19
It wouldn't surprise me. sakabatou Jun 2023 #20
Agreed. Hopefully the involved agencies are investigating. ecstatic Jun 2023 #24
Chump's employees - formerly loyal - will spill the beans FakeNoose Jun 2023 #25
Fucker can't keep his fat yap shut for 5 minutes Blue Owl Jun 2023 #26
Kid Rock said Trump showed him "a map and BLEEP." Kid Berwyn Jun 2023 #29
Certainly but Disaffected Jun 2023 #30
Fuck that shit edhopper Jun 2023 #31
Yeah, that's what they said about a lot of Disaffected Jun 2023 #34
I am not a court of law edhopper Jun 2023 #36
Purely guessing, but I bet newdayneeded Jun 2023 #32
US and our allies' agents died after these secrets were made available to foreign agents LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2023 #33
He didn't physically show classified documents to our enemies FlyingPiggy Jun 2023 #39

mahina

(17,970 posts)
1. Of course he did
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 12:54 PM
Jun 2023

I don’t have any evidence of it, but I will call how pleased everybody was in that first meeting with Lavrov and for the first time, no American witnesses.

edhopper

(34,024 posts)
2. We both know it
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 12:55 PM
Jun 2023

but it needs to be clearly made public and the proof of it is one of the most important things that needs to come from the investigation.

Qutzupalotl

(14,434 posts)
8. Smith knows what was in the documents too sensitive to use at trial.
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 01:14 PM
Jun 2023

I picture him thinking, “I know what you did, traitor. Tick tock, motherfucker.”

Qutzupalotl

(14,434 posts)
27. Yet he only charged 31 counts out of well over 100 documents.
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 04:00 PM
Jun 2023

We are about to witness one such special trial, but even Smith knows some secrets are too sensitive to risk further disclosure.

edhopper

(34,024 posts)
23. The question is
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 03:39 PM
Jun 2023

there evidence that can be presented to the public. Not whether he did it, which he did.

Stuart G

(38,538 posts)
35. Outstanding Comment..."This isn't over yet, by any means"
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 08:31 PM
Jun 2023

Or........"It ain't over till it's over.".......Thank you for above comment at top.

Fiendish Thingy

(15,906 posts)
9. Hopefully Smith will be able to answer the question
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 01:20 PM
Jun 2023

But in any case, the IC will be able to speak to the damage done by compromising programs and sources by the insecure storage of the documents.

Hopefully that will be enough to convict Trump.

live love laugh

(13,411 posts)
16. Hmmmm maybe 🤔 ... that's the ULTIMATE crime to take
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 01:35 PM
Jun 2023

something that can’t be revealed as taken.

Wow!

onenote

(43,308 posts)
28. A majority of the top secret docs seized at Mar-a-Lago are referenced in the indictment.
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 04:02 PM
Jun 2023

DOJ filed an inventory with the district court stating that 103 classified documents were found in the search of Mar-a-Lago of which 18 were top secret. In the indictment, they indicate that 102 classified documents were found in the search of Mar-a-Lago and 17 were top secret. The indictment bases separate charges on 11 of those 17 or 18 top secret documents. So there were only 6 or 7 of those top secret documents that weren't referenced in the indictment. Another 10 top secret documents that were given to DOJ in June, in response to the subpoena, are referenced in the indictment. We don't know the classification of the other 28 documents turned over in response to the subpoena, but even if all 28 were top secret, it would mean that DOJ obtained 56 or 55 top secret documents in response to the subpoena or in the search and didn't use 34 or 35 of them in the indictment. That's a majority, but not exactly a "vast"majority. And depending on how many of the 38 documents turned over in response to the subpoena actually were top secret, it could be that DOJ has in fact referenced a majority of the top secret documents in the indictment.

If there were other top secret documents seized or turned over to DOJ that were not acknowledged in the inventory or the indictment, DOJ would be in big trouble for providing false or misleading information to the court.

Enoki33

(1,595 posts)
11. Recall how his initial actions all
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 01:24 PM
Jun 2023

benefited Russia when he first became president?. The secret documents handover was the final betrayal. He is truly without one good redeeming factor.

BComplex

(8,287 posts)
14. We all know he did. I hope JSmith has the translator for that meeting that trump/putin
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 01:27 PM
Jun 2023

wouldn't let anybody else in on. That translator could tell him a whole host of traitorisms.

Trump needs to fry in isolated confinement for this.

stopdiggin

(11,649 posts)
15. many people believing
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 01:31 PM
Jun 2023

(even a 'majority' of people believing) - is still not evidence that something in fact occurred.

Part of the reason that the recent indictments were such a gut punch to the establishment - was because they brought the goods.. NOW try arguing with me about whether this was nit picky 'overkill.' Point being - there's tremendous value in waiting - until the bastards are really nailed to the damned wall.

H2O Man

(74,028 posts)
18. I'm curious if
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 02:00 PM
Jun 2023

you could explain what exactly you mean by saying the indictments "were such a gut punch to the establishment." It could just be me, but I tend to think of the DOJ as part of the "establishment." Maybe even a majority of people here do. But as you note, we could be wrong in thinking that. But I consider the indictments to being the establishment as landing a "gut punch" to the toxic growth of the defendent and his maga cult -- much the same as I did the indictments, trials, and convictions of the January 6 thugs.

stopdiggin

(11,649 posts)
37. my aim there was actually thinking of old guard
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 09:41 PM
Jun 2023

GOP in particular. But also have to think that there are a lot of military and regular civil servant types ( both current and ex) - that are feeling awfully sick to their stomachs at the revelations the indictments brought home. (and have to admit DOJ - not really part of that thought process at all)

flamingdem

(39,380 posts)
19. If the FBI and CIA wasn't on top of this
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 02:10 PM
Jun 2023

then they are compromised as well.

They have to have evidence of something....

ecstatic

(32,933 posts)
24. Agreed. Hopefully the involved agencies are investigating.
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 03:50 PM
Jun 2023

Did any agents go missing? Did any agents die? It's top secret so I guess the only people who can really investigate would be from the agencies that were compromised. Who gives the order though, and have they done so yet?

FakeNoose

(33,553 posts)
25. Chump's employees - formerly loyal - will spill the beans
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 03:57 PM
Jun 2023

And we can guess that Jack Smith has already heard their testimony.

Lock him up, throw away the key!

Blue Owl

(51,365 posts)
26. Fucker can't keep his fat yap shut for 5 minutes
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 03:59 PM
Jun 2023

And we have statements from his guests at Mar a Lago that he showed them off -- all to bolster his big fat ego, no doubt...

Disaffected

(4,656 posts)
30. Certainly but
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 04:47 PM
Jun 2023

we should wait until said hypothetical evidence is actually made known and brought to trial. Even Trump is innocent until proven guilty.

Disaffected

(4,656 posts)
34. Yeah, that's what they said about a lot of
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 08:28 PM
Jun 2023

people who were wrongly convicted of serious crimes (including especially those who were executed or spent life in prison as a result).

Mr. Hopper, if you ever wrongly charged and brought to trial for a serious crime, I sincerely hope folks who think like that are not on the jury.

edhopper

(34,024 posts)
36. I am not a court of law
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 09:02 PM
Jun 2023

I need not presume his innocence. I have seen enough already to know he was caught red handed.

newdayneeded

(1,979 posts)
32. Purely guessing, but I bet
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 07:22 PM
Jun 2023

Smith has an actual top secret document somehow recovered from a foreign house, and a paper trail of the sale and delivery from donny.

FlyingPiggy

(3,407 posts)
39. He didn't physically show classified documents to our enemies
Sun Jun 18, 2023, 11:30 PM
Jun 2023

He just had them over for “dinner” and left it open for anyone to “discover” in an unlocked room. Lets see how much $ he got paid for doing so…

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did TFG disseminate class...