General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMissing sub has around 40 hrs oxygen
This was posted around 3 hours ago, bringing it to around 37 hours. I think the chaces of bringing it up with any survivors is about zero.
Washington: A tourist vessel carrying five people on an expedition to see the wreck of the Titanic is running out of oxygen as authorities race against time to find survivors in the face of logistical challenges.
Almost two days after the submersible, known as the Titan, disappeared off the coast of Canada, rescuers had not yet located the missing vessel. The US Coast Guard has warned that its passengers only had about 40 hours of breathable air left.
US Coast Guard captain Jamie Frederick said authorities were doing everything they could to find the Titan and its passengers in the face of unique challenges such as deep water ocean pressure, limited visibility and the remoteness of the dive site.
Our crews are working around the clock to ensure that were doing everything possible to locate the Titan and the five crew members, Frederick said.
But this is a complex search. Its complex for a variety of reasons.
https://www.theage.com.au/world/north-america/complex-search-rescuers-yet-to-find-missing-titan-submersible-as-time-ticks-down-20230621-p5di50.html
MarineCombatEngineer
(18,060 posts)I seriously doubt that there's any chance of them being alive at this point.
At least if it imploded, it was quick as opposed to suffocation.
yardwork
(69,364 posts)A small vessel like that would crumple to practically nothing if it imploded at that depth. The fact that the ship lost all communications all at once seems very ominous.
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,461 posts)And someone will pay $500k to view the wreckage
yardwork
(69,364 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,478 posts)bluestarone
(22,178 posts)I believe they lost contact not to long after it dived. Probably right after it reached the depth the safety worker told them it could go.
ret5hd
(22,502 posts)
2naSalit
(102,793 posts)brer cat
(27,587 posts)Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)yardwork
(69,364 posts)I hope it was very quick. If the little sub lost pressure through an air leak or something, it might have imploded before they even knew anything was wrong.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)I cannot even fathom how the stress they're under if they're still alive. How incredibly terrifying
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(14,239 posts)https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12215697/Former-Titanic-sub-tourist-reveals-expedition-waiver-listed-three-ways-die-page-one.html
Speaking to the BBC today, Mr Reiss revealed he has been on three separate dives including the one to the Titanic and that each had 'lost communication'.
He also detailed the experience of being onboard the luxury submersible, which tourists fork out $250,000 to travel on to the wreckage.
'The experience going down was very relaxing, it's a beautifully-designed submarine that feels almost spa-like on the inside. So even though there's five people just sitting on the floor of something that's about the size of a minivan it's very comfortable.
'I fell asleep on the way down it's 2.5 hours of just dropping in the very quiet and there is a porthole but all you see is blackness.'
He said even though they made it to within 500 metres of the Titanic, the sub had to spend 'a good 90 minutes just doing a random walk on the bottom of the ocean, just flailing around and trying to find the biggest boat in the world'.
The passengers on his expedition only had a short amount of time to see what he described as the 'highlights' of the world famous wreck.
'Twenty minutes before we had to resurface we finally saw the Titanic and I have to say it was just enough in our case for a highlights tour, we looked at the anchor, looked at the porthole, looked at the bow of the ship and then we had to go back up.
'It shows you the unpredictability of it all. The next day they sent another 5 passengers down to see it and they circled it and got to see every inch of it.

yardwork
(69,364 posts)They don't see anything going down in person that they can't see on Netflix at home.
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(14,239 posts)yardwork
(69,364 posts)Big waste of money. Conspicuous consumption.
Sky Jewels
(9,148 posts)on the summit of Everest or riding in Elon's fucking rocket or some other ill-advised "adventure."
I'm sure social media has increased the demand for this kind of showing off exponentially.
Also, I gather that a lot of these rich fucks think they're immune to disaster because their lives have been a bed or roses and they're entitled to have everything go well for them because, well, they're special.
democratsruletheday
(1,880 posts)as my grand pappy used to say: they've got more money than brains
Cuthbert Allgood
(5,339 posts)You are actually seeing it and not footage.
I want to go to see where Wordsworth wrote Tinted Abby. I can see video of the words by the river, but I want to be there. Same with going to Dublin to see the geography Joyce was writing about in Ulysses. I can see all the footage I want, but I want to be there.
Now this is obviously more dangerous, but I get the sentiment.
yardwork
(69,364 posts)They are literally looking out an 18 inch plexiglass window at a few bits and pieces of the Titanic. They can't touch it, breathe it, feel it. They are literally seeing the same images - fewer, and probably lower quality - than they can see in a documentary.
Going to a castle, abbey, river, city is a completely different experience. You can touch things, breathe tge air, walk around, be part of it.
LisaL
(47,423 posts)There is no danger in watching Netflix, is there?
sky_masterson
(589 posts)If they arent floating on the surface right now, they are most certainly dead. It had to of imploded.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)And it became ... not rated for it.
sky_masterson
(589 posts)100%
ecstatic
(35,075 posts)Xolodno
(7,350 posts)CEO or some other big boss cut labor costs (i.e. fire people) and the maintenance crew has to take short cuts, let some items go unchecked for longer times, etc.
I remember Disneyland had a spate of accidents, some deadly during Eisner's tenure. He had analysts looking for ways to cut down on labor (despite making a ton of profit). In one article I read, an analyst approached a maintenance guy and asked why did they check wheels of an attraction every night since their data shows they never break down. He responded, they never break down because we check them every night.
Come to think of it, even in the Finance arena where I work, it happens, but not with deadly repercussions. New boss comes in, fires a lot of what he perceived to be dead weight. Six months later he asks a manager if they could embark on a particular project that would provide some insight and perhaps increase revenue. The manager said 'no'. He ask why and he told him six months earlier he just fired everyone that had the expertise to do said project.
tinrobot
(12,062 posts)That constant pressurization/depressurization can be very stressful.
The original safety inspector asked for tests to check the carbon fiber hull, but they fired him instead of doing the tests. That was years ago. Doubt any tests were ever done.
Brother Buzz
(39,899 posts)Every time they go down and stress the hull, a boatload of carbon fibers break. Repeated cycles simply weakens the hull further. It's a guessing game to determine what it should have been rated for on its last dive, but it sounds like the fired safety office, erring on the side of caution, might have been right.
MontanaMama
(24,722 posts)I cant imagine forking out $150,000 or more and end up dying this way.
Raine
(31,177 posts)ecstatic
(35,075 posts)This is horrible. I hope they don't suffer. Also, sending thoughts to the 300 migrants who died at sea off the coast of Greece.
MarineCombatEngineer
(18,060 posts)that's why during WWII, submarine crews were instructed to minimize activity while pinned down by enemy forces, off duty crews were confined to their bunks to conserve O2 while underwater, unlike modern subs, which create their own O2.
Scrivener7
(59,522 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(18,060 posts)All of the above?
Safety didn't seem to be a big concern with this company.
Scrivener7
(59,522 posts)I grew up on the water. You don't mess with an ocean.
canetoad
(20,769 posts)When I'm on the rocks or beach, "Never turn your back on the sea."
EX500rider
(12,583 posts)d'oh!
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-us-canada-65953941
Scrivener7
(59,522 posts)That whole venture sounds so irresponsible. What a nightmarish way to go.
Conjuay
(3,067 posts)the amount of O2 would mean nothing. They will have frozen to death before suffocating.
MarineCombatEngineer
(18,060 posts)they're swimming with the fishes.
harumph
(3,278 posts)No beacon - it had no built in beacon. I mean that's the bare minimum. I heard a sub expert saying
the design was experimental and he would not get in it. This same shit is going to happen with
space tourism - mark it down.