Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TomDaisy

(2,120 posts)
Sat Jun 24, 2023, 07:03 PM Jun 2023

Thom Hartmann proposes that Ongoing bribery of RW SC Justices is meant to keep them in line

Thom Hartmann asks the question - why do right wing billionaires go beyond just getting their Justices on the Court? Why is it necessary to keep bribing them for decades?

His answer - to keep them from drifting left, as others have. In the past, other conservative Justices have used the protection of the lifetime appointment to move left and do what they felt was right. The billionaires want to make sure this never happens again.

https://hartmannreport.com/p/have-billionaires-outfitted-justices-062

Have Billionaires Outfitted Justices with Golden Handcuffs to Stop “Liberal Drift”?

The GOP & the billionaires who fund them learned their lesson. Never again would they allow a rightwing justice to stray beyond the rigid ideological boundaries set at that justices’ confirmation…


And the private-sector kings and barons of banking, real estate, and industry? These men, who control billions of dollars, are not going to lower themselves to making simple bribes.

They’re not going to risk their lifestyles — second-country passports, private jets and yachts, mansions in multiple nations, and complete authority over vast empires of wealth and the power associated with it — with a penny-ante bribe for a vote once in a while.

A simpler and, I think, more cogent argument to explain this behavior is that these billionaires are fitting their target justices with golden handcuffs.

And they must feel the need to do so because history shows that justices — once they have lifetime tenure and are otherwise not answerable to anybody, including voters, lobbyists, or special interests — tend to become more liberal the longer they’re on the bench.


Thom says it's not about bribing them vote by vote. It's not transactional specifically. It's to keep them focused on the needs of billionaires, not the needs of working people. To make the Justices feel like they are part of the oligarch class and to have affinity for that class.
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thom Hartmann proposes that Ongoing bribery of RW SC Justices is meant to keep them in line (Original Post) TomDaisy Jun 2023 OP
and since money is speech there's nothing wrong in 'speaking' to the berobed swine Ponietz Jun 2023 #1
It does make some sense. I remember how enraged the neocons and religious right were... keep_left Jun 2023 #2

keep_left

(3,211 posts)
2. It does make some sense. I remember how enraged the neocons and religious right were...
Sat Jun 24, 2023, 08:09 PM
Jun 2023

...about David Souter, particularly when he started moving to the center after just a couple of years on the Supreme Court. And not long after Clarence Thomas was appointed, Souter was no longer a reliable conservative vote.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Thom Hartmann proposes th...