Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS blocks Louisiana's congressional map. Louisiana will have to redraw its congressional map (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2023 OP
So the same Court that said racism is over and thus the voting laws are void ... sanatanadharma Jun 2023 #1
I think they thought we were going to roll over. Baitball Blogger Jun 2023 #5
they werent betting on a marc elias to emerge. mopinko Jun 2023 #6
And thank (insert your deity, higher power or whatever here) he did! He's amazing! liberalla Jun 2023 #10
Yup, I agree Katcat Jun 2023 #8
If only there were sone sort of ACT about VOTING RIGHTS Congress could put in place Takket Jun 2023 #9
Ya think the scandals are making the justices to think twice............................. Lovie777 Jun 2023 #2
Wow Johnny2X2X Jun 2023 #3
I saw that SCOTUSblog said that we'd just be getting orders today and no opinions until tomorrow. mahatmakanejeeves Jun 2023 #4
Good. K&R brer cat Jun 2023 #7
This Court disdains any Constitutional matters that protect "the little people" world wide wally Jun 2023 #11
Don't get too excited - Ms. Toad Jun 2023 #12
Here is the procedural history of this case LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2023 #14
Thanks! Ms. Toad Jun 2023 #15
I rely on Marc LetMyPeopleVote Jun 2023 #16
Yes this was from the Alabama decision DLCWIdem Jun 2023 #13

sanatanadharma

(4,089 posts)
1. So the same Court that said racism is over and thus the voting laws are void ...
Mon Jun 26, 2023, 09:47 AM
Jun 2023

So the same Court that said racism is over and thus the voting laws are void, is now saying some States are racially denying voters their rights.
Could it be, that they see, how wrong they were, to judge in a blur.

Baitball Blogger

(52,341 posts)
5. I think they thought we were going to roll over.
Mon Jun 26, 2023, 09:59 AM
Jun 2023

They had a plan. And didn’t expect to find the level of push back they’re receiving. But they went too far and the line they crossed is now becoming a chasm where people on our side are questioning their rulings and legitimacy. The narcissist on the Supreme Court know that without credibility they are nothing.

liberalla

(11,088 posts)
10. And thank (insert your deity, higher power or whatever here) he did! He's amazing!
Mon Jun 26, 2023, 12:15 PM
Jun 2023

and seemingly tireless also...


There should be a statue of him one day...


Katcat

(574 posts)
8. Yup, I agree
Mon Jun 26, 2023, 11:49 AM
Jun 2023

I also think they’re trying to distract us from their own criminal activities. Very damn one of the republicans on the unSC need their taxes to be audited and made public.

Takket

(23,714 posts)
9. If only there were sone sort of ACT about VOTING RIGHTS Congress could put in place
Mon Jun 26, 2023, 11:58 AM
Jun 2023

To prevent this sort of thing.

Lovie777

(22,961 posts)
2. Ya think the scandals are making the justices to think twice.............................
Mon Jun 26, 2023, 09:49 AM
Jun 2023

I mean the 6 RW justices are beholden to their billionaire donors.

Johnny2X2X

(24,203 posts)
3. Wow
Mon Jun 26, 2023, 09:52 AM
Jun 2023

Second such case they ruled on giving a lot of ammo to groups challenging the racist maps the GOP have drawn in numerous states.

mahatmakanejeeves

(69,838 posts)
4. I saw that SCOTUSblog said that we'd just be getting orders today and no opinions until tomorrow.
Mon Jun 26, 2023, 09:58 AM
Jun 2023

They don't seem to get as worked up over orders as they do opinions.

And good morning.

Ms. Toad

(38,634 posts)
12. Don't get too excited -
Mon Jun 26, 2023, 12:30 PM
Jun 2023

This is just an "oops" we messed up. We said we'd hear the case, but we shouldn't have because the lower court hasn't ruled on it yet (which also means the stay of the trial court order shouldn't have been vacated). Ordinarily, you can't skip over the lower court to have it heard by the supreme court.

LetMyPeopleVote

(179,822 posts)
14. Here is the procedural history of this case
Mon Jun 26, 2023, 01:05 PM
Jun 2023

Here is a good explanation from Marc Elias' Democracy Docket



https://www.democracydocket.com/cases/louisiana-congressional-redistricting-challenge-robinson/

Lawsuit filed on behalf of voters and civil rights groups challenging Louisiana’s new congressional map. The complaint points out that, even though Black residents make up one-third of Louisiana’s population, they can only elect their candidate of choice in one out of the six congressional districts. The plaintiffs argue that, by failing to include a second minority opportunity district, this new congressional map dilutes the voting strength of Black residents in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). Because of this, the plaintiffs ask the court to block the map and order the creation of a new map that includes a second minority opportunity district in compliance with the VRA. The case was consolidated with Galmon v. Ardoin.

On June 6, 2022, a preliminary injunction was granted blocking the congressional map for the 2022 election cycle, which the defendants immediately appealed. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted an administrative stay (meaning pause) of the district court’s order, but three days later vacated the administrative stay and denied the motion to stay pending appeal.

The state then filed an emergency application in the U.S. Supreme Court asking it to pause the district court’s preliminary injunction. In a 6-3 order, the Supreme Court granted the application, thereby reinstating the previously blocked congressional map. The Court’s conservative justices also agreed to review the case before the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision and paused the case until the Court decides a similar case about Alabama’s congressional map.

On Monday, June 26, 2023, the Supreme Court unpaused the order blocking Louisiana’s congressional map and sent the case back to the 5th Circuit for further litigation.

Without the stay, the lower court ruling still stands. The 5th Circuit had already dissolved its stay. Given the ruling the Alabama case, the plaintiffs will soon move to get a new map in time for the 2024 elections.

Ms. Toad

(38,634 posts)
15. Thanks!
Mon Jun 26, 2023, 01:19 PM
Jun 2023

That's about what I figured, but I'm not functional enough to do the resesarch today.

DLCWIdem

(1,580 posts)
13. Yes this was from the Alabama decision
Mon Jun 26, 2023, 12:42 PM
Jun 2023

The case in Alabama was decided and the other cases that were on the docket can roll forward. I heard that this case could could create as many as 5 new districts 5 new seats in Congress.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCOTUS blocks Louisiana's...