Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Aristus

(72,188 posts)
4. That's just for the below-averages.
Tue Jun 27, 2023, 11:06 AM
Jun 2023

Those of us with functioning brains usually have the attention span to go with it.

bucolic_frolic

(55,143 posts)
2. It helps to have a whole lot of in-house corruption going on
Tue Jun 27, 2023, 10:34 AM
Jun 2023

Eventually some laws will have been broken. Then what?

Roberts has run a rather patrician, clubby Court. Former GOP election lawyer, 2000, you know?

rubbersole

(11,223 posts)
13. These fair decisions are a smokescreen for what Leonard Leo really paid for.
Tue Jun 27, 2023, 12:05 PM
Jun 2023

I think the cat is out of the bag. Right-wing corruption/oligarch money influence has been exposed. More shit is going to hit the fan. Can't come soon enough.

Johnny2X2X

(24,210 posts)
5. There's a lot that goes on behind the scenes
Tue Jun 27, 2023, 11:14 AM
Jun 2023

The justices are constantly talking to one another and there's a good deal of pursuasion that can happen. Kavanaugh and Coney could end up being Kennedy like moderates on all but a few issues. Certainly looking like this court is making an effort to be fair, that's a good thing.

ThoughtCriminal

(14,721 posts)
6. He needs to push some real ethics rules to be credible
Tue Jun 27, 2023, 11:22 AM
Jun 2023

So far, the Court is just giving the public a raised middle finger.

stopdiggin

(15,463 posts)
8. it's called the Roberts court
Tue Jun 27, 2023, 11:23 AM
Jun 2023

but the degree of actual control Roberts has - has been pretty self evident for some time - and declined further with the appointment of Coney Barrett. In agreement that the court (the full nine) is 'getting the message.' Whether anybody is going to be 'reined in' by sober reflection (as opposed to Roberts) - remains to be seen. (and we might not have the answer to that for years)

 

brush

(61,033 posts)
14. This exactly. Roberts' tenure has been quite distinguished in it's undistinquished mediocrity.
Tue Jun 27, 2023, 12:20 PM
Jun 2023

Check that...undistinquished, yes, but cuts below ordinary mediocrity I must say...what with the Citizens United decision, the disastrous Heller/Scalia gun unleashing, the disgraceful Kennedy/Kavanaugh buy out, and of course the worst of all, the right-before-out-eyes Dobbs betrayal of million of American women and their supporters.

It's too late for Roberts to redeem himself, but maybe he's trying. Him, Comey and Barr must all be from the same batch number.

unblock

(56,198 posts)
15. He has no interest in redemption. He's just trying to keep the pitchforks at bay
Tue Jun 27, 2023, 12:50 PM
Jun 2023

The only reason he's moderating at all is to try to stave off something like congress adding 4 seats to restore sone balance to the court.

 

brush

(61,033 posts)
16. You're of course right, but expanding SCOTUS is just about unattainable.
Tue Jun 27, 2023, 12:54 PM
Jun 2023

We can't even get an ethics code for SCOTUS.

ITAL

(1,323 posts)
12. I think it's apparent
Tue Jun 27, 2023, 11:43 AM
Jun 2023

That he's tried to rein in the hard right wing for several years. He's definitely super conservative himself, but he's also an institutionalist. The most important number to him is nine, and the crazier the court rules, the less likely that number stays as is.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I think SCOTUS Chief Just...