General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMeadowoak
(6,606 posts)In society, while others welcome change, in hope of improving society.
EYESORE 9001
(29,878 posts)Thats just off the top of my head
treestar
(82,383 posts)don't want it to change.
The older people get, the harder it is to change, and the reason for the change starts to seem less compelling.
The right of the present time actually does want a lot of change - backward change, but change.
SYFROYH
(34,214 posts)Some people benefit more from change than others.
debm55
(61,604 posts)SYFROYH
(34,214 posts)Perhaps not as direct those who seek the status quo, but self-interest nevertheless.
For example, I support social safety nets for all because I will eventually benefit from them as well. It's also nice to help others.
uponit7771
(93,532 posts)grumpyduck
(6,686 posts)It probably also has to do with having the ability to think or not having that ability.
Accepting change requires a certain amount of thinking about what and why, and comparing the old with the new, and asking "what if." IMHO, many people who resist change either are not able to think about it or are just too lazy to do so.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)Change represents uncertainty. A large % of the population are born thinking that it's best to adhere to old (and hence presumably 'proven', that's why we still know about them) ways.
That's why they cling to things like the 'wisdom of The Founders' and '2000 year old Holy Books', and '1950's Life As Depicted in Sitcoms' and the like.
This tendency exists in a certain % of people regardless of the period in history, the culture, the race, the society, etc.
It's a survival strategy built into our genome.
So is racism and bigotry.
debm55
(61,604 posts)mathematic
(1,618 posts)Periodically, there are self-congratulatory posts on DU that highlight the nobility of liberals or people on the left to boldly and courageously embrace change while decrying the moral failing of conservatives to do similarly.
The reality is that people of all political ideologies embrace change that moves society towards their ideology or personal gain and rejects change that does the opposite. Roe was law for 50 years and conservatives worked tirelessly to change that. Liberals strongly resisted it but ultimately failed. Those same conservatives supported workplace discrimination against women and those same liberals opposed it. This too has been a struggle for change over the last 50 years but the opposite people were supporting change.
Now there are plenty of people that are "set in their ways". They've lived in the same place for decades, they eat the same food every week, they only watch Friends reruns, they always vote or never vote, and always for the same party. Why do these people exist? Plenty of reasons but trying to tie this to current American politics, which are rife with conservative activists agitating for dramatic change, seems off the mark.
debm55
(61,604 posts)MuseRider
(35,176 posts)empathy?
It just blows my mind that there are so many people who could care less about anyone else or their lives.
Caliman73
(11,767 posts)Some of the most significant stressors involve change. Changing jobs, a change in relationship status (both divorce and marriage). It depends, as others have alluded to, on a person's mindset and worldview. People who are more likely to embrace change, are people see change as a challenge and opportunity. People who may be more adventurous. People who are more likely to resist change tend to require consistency for optimal functioning. They see change as a negative. As some people have said, some people see change as a challenge to the identity whereas others see it as an opportunity for growth.