Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

FBaggins

(28,706 posts)
2. No chance of that being constitutional
Sat Jul 1, 2023, 05:17 AM
Jul 2023

But I doubt that the linked Fox title accurately describes what the law says.

MichMan

(17,151 posts)
3. Wow, good luck being able to prove intent
Sat Jul 1, 2023, 06:37 AM
Jul 2023

"Hey, what did they get you for? I carjacked someone and crashed fleeing the cops"

"Well, I called someone she instead of they, & got 5 years in the joint for it"



WhiskeyGrinder

(26,956 posts)
5. That's not what the law is about -- that's an interpretation from some "legal experts" scared up by
Sat Jul 1, 2023, 07:35 AM
Jul 2023

the Daily Wire and quoted by Fox news.

Here's a better look at the proposal, which is meant to update hate crime laws:

The Michigan Hate Crime Act, which passed 59-50 in the Democratic-controlled House, would replace Michigan's 1988 ethnic intimidation law so that more categories of people fall under the law's protections.

The law would expand to include protections based on sex, sexual orientation, age, gender identity or physical or mental disabilities. Religion, ethnicity, and race were already protected under the ethnic intimidation law and would continue to be protected under the hate crime act.

The legislation also would expand which actions qualify as a hate crime, from threats or damage of property under the current law, to targeted force, intimidation, threats, bodily injury or damage of personal property.

Intimidation would be defined as "repeated or continuing harassment of another individual" that would cause them to feel "terrorized, frightened or threatened." It would not include "constitutionally protected activity or conduct that serves a legitimate purpose."


From: https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/michigan/2023/06/20/michigan-house-oks-new-hate-crime-church-synagogue-cemetery-desecration-penalties/70337842007/

MichMan

(17,151 posts)
7. So, using the wrong pronoun is specifically not applicable under the new definitions?
Sat Jul 1, 2023, 07:46 AM
Jul 2023

Even if done intentionally?

MichMan

(17,151 posts)
10. I will have to look the actual bill to see if it is included in the sexual orientation portion
Sat Jul 1, 2023, 08:08 AM
Jul 2023

Response to WhiskeyGrinder (Reply #5)

Vinca

(53,994 posts)
12. Well, it's nice to know the Michigan lawmakers are working on the big issues.
Sat Jul 1, 2023, 08:15 AM
Jul 2023
If Trump has an event there and makes one of his usual gaffes is it going to be a felony? Why the fuck do these people care what anyone wants to call themselves?
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Michigan House Vote - Wro...