General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsdays after SCOTUS allows discrimination, rightwinger complains that Target won't carry his book
Book title : "The Democratic Party Hates America"

tulipsandroses
(8,251 posts)Snowflake!
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(14,241 posts)GP6971
(38,014 posts)I guess they don't like two way streets.
dalton99a
(94,119 posts)
Cha
(319,076 posts)Celerity
(54,407 posts)Maraya1969
(23,497 posts)a happy person with the way he rages all the time - just like trump.
Comfortably_Numb
(4,188 posts)Celerity
(54,407 posts)
GenThePerservering
(3,379 posts)is such marketing horseshit - people get paid by the line to crap that stuff out. Look for it in the remainder pile in less than a year, along with Cryin' Kari's book.
The Grand Illuminist
(2,040 posts)2 can play the discrimination game. I hope businesses demand proof of party to get service and deny the right.
50 Shades Of Blue
(11,391 posts)AllaN01Bear
(29,494 posts)Orrex
(67,111 posts)Never heard of him.
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(14,241 posts)A 2016 study which sought to measure incendiary discourse on talk radio and TV found that Levin scored highest on its measure of "outrage". The study looked at 10 prominent radio and television programs, known for incendiary discourse on political matters, and scored content on the basis of whether it used "emotional display", "misrepresentative exaggeration", "mockery", "conflagration", "slippery slope", "insulting" or "obscene language", and other factors, finding that Levin was the radio host who engaged in the most outrage.
The study found that he utilized "outrage speech or behavior at a rate of more than one instance per minute."[2] In How Democracies Die, Harvard University political scientists Daniel Ziblatt and Steven Levitsky write that Mark Levin was among the popular right-wing talk radio hosts who "helped to legitimate the use of uncivil discourse" in American politics, and contribute to the erosion of democratic norms.[67] According to Politico, Levin has a "penchant for hysteria."[68]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Levin
was Chief of staff for Edwin Meese
Orrex
(67,111 posts)It would be a real shame if he fell in an open manhole and drowned in hot raw sewage.
dgauss
(1,528 posts)Seems like a crude AI version of an outraged Republican pundit but he was around before that technology so he's more like a prototype or template.
Skittles
(171,714 posts)makes me suspicious!
Maraya1969
(23,497 posts)Runningdawg
(4,664 posts)BOSSHOG
(44,738 posts)Is Moms for Liberty Approved.
musette_sf
(10,486 posts)FAFO
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)Target will probably agree to put up some display that says something like "the new book by Mark Levin is available upon request, please see a Sales Associate" or perhaps put a wrapper on covers saying "New Bestselling Mark Levin Book" or something.
I mean honestly I don't give a shit if they want to sell his book, in the open. I'm not a snowflake who's going to have breakdown over it, not like some whiny RWNJ who comes unglued because ZOMG PRIDE!!!?!
moniss
(9,056 posts)a radio show hosted by progressives when they were talking about Levin. When they picked up my call I began talking to them while holding my fingers tight and closing off my nose. Several of them picked up on it and we were having a good time talking back and forth and laughing.
ZonkerHarris
(25,577 posts)NBachers
(19,438 posts)Hassler
(4,924 posts)Artcatt
(344 posts)kimbutgar
(27,248 posts)The kind of people who read Levin books arent shopping at Target and reading books with so many big words.
Norbert
(7,765 posts)and more to do with what is sellable. The title alone suggests a significant number of Target Shoppers will have no interest in buying the book. Target may be better off selling buggy whips.
onenote
(46,142 posts)There is no legal principle that compels a bookseller to sell a book it doesn't want to sell.
AdamGG
(1,882 posts)I'd been having an ok conversation with him while it was in commercials and then it opened with the national anthem and I figured that it would be something right wing and then there was some of the insanest ranting I've heard about how the January 6th people were Patriots and that it's the Democrats in Congress who are traitors.
My ride was over and I didn't feel like investing the energy to tell him that it was inappropriate to have paying passengers listen to that. He probably would have gotten off on thinking he'd owned a lib.
I'm in Kansas City and have had some bizarre right wing Uber drivers. One with InfoWars stickers, another one in early 2021 who was telling me that only 300 people have actually had COVID and that it's all a corporate conspiracy. To be fair, I've also had plenty of normal people who played NPR or decent music.
BlueWaveNeverEnd
(14,241 posts)Mark Levine is almost at the crazy level of that infowar guy...not stop invented conspiracy nonsense disguised as patriotism.
hibbing
(10,598 posts)We all know how radically left wing huge corporations are.
Peace
aggiesal
(10,804 posts)Probably not selling very well so he has to create this dust up to get some publicity.
Xolodno
(7,350 posts)Well, damn.
They are now chasing off their biggest donors with their crazy. Guess no one told them, corporations are their for profit and alienating a larger customer base for a smaller and shrinking one isn't good for business.
Oneironaut
(6,299 posts)its totally different / the exception.
Wounded Bear
(64,324 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)...stores have never been obliged to sell every book published.
Demsrule86
(71,542 posts)created a fake case so they were able to rule in order to hurt LGBTQ. They hate them. That is the truth. Well. Colorado has told SCOTUS they may keep their anti-discrimination laws, and SCOTUS can go pound sand or if you prefer. "Make me"! This is bad for the country and distresses me but the most corrupt, out-of-step court in our history brought it on themselves
Alexander Hamilton once described the judiciary as the least dangerous branch of government, since it controlled no armies and lacked spending power. We give SCOTUS the power because we respect the institution.
https://www.google.com/search?q=who+said+courts+have+no+armies&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS1002US1002&sxsrf=AB5stBi-OzzHTA2lD5SeA-s8OrOoTGUJJg%3A1688655730581&ei=ctemZO-BI-yzqtsPgMi5yAY&ved=0ahUKEwjvguDnrPr_AhXsmWoFHQBkDmkQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=who+said+courts+have+no+armies&gs_lcp=Cgxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAQAzIICCEQoAEQwwQyCAghEKABEMMEOgoIABBHENYEELADOgcIIxCwAhAnOgoIIRCgARDDBBAKOgUIABCiBEoECEEYAFDIBVjyRWCFTmgDcAF4AYABowGIAb4VkgEFMTQuMTOYAQCgAQHAAQHIAQg&sclient=gws-wiz-serp