Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sarcasmo

(23,968 posts)
Wed Jul 5, 2023, 10:30 PM Jul 2023

"Witness 5 removed approximately 64 boxes from the Storage Room area between May 24 and June 1."



"2022, but only returned 25-30 boxes to the Storage room area on June 2, 2022."



Nauta is witness #5, and Witness #5 is going to jail.
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Witness 5 removed approximately 64 boxes from the Storage Room area between May 24 and June 1." (Original Post) sarcasmo Jul 2023 OP
Witness 5 removed 64 boxes for Individual 1 Blue Owl Jul 2023 #1
He got coffee for me once. Takket Jul 2023 #2
Would you give Witness 5 a pass if he implicated Individual 1? brooklynite Jul 2023 #3
That might be one reason moniss Jul 2023 #5
Yes, if Nauta can find an attorney and cut a deal. sarcasmo Jul 2023 #10
Witness #5 should make a deal. Joinfortmill Jul 2023 #4
Trump has probably told him Tree Lady Jul 2023 #12
Trump has promised him a pardon and a job Captain Zero Jul 2023 #13
Or he's promised to ruin his life Demobrat Jul 2023 #14
29 months and counting republianmushroom Jul 2023 #6
Which number witness is orange boy? Artcatt Jul 2023 #7
And he lied about it-- a separate crime. n/t Eyeball_Kid Jul 2023 #8
Walt is the dumbest dumbfuck in America ZonkerHarris Jul 2023 #9
Hair dye Rudy and Nauta are pretty even. sarcasmo Jul 2023 #11

moniss

(4,274 posts)
5. That might be one reason
Wed Jul 5, 2023, 11:44 PM
Jul 2023

why he is labeled Witness #5 rather than Individual #2. At least for part of this and thus far as not having been arraigned. But in direct answer to the question I don't honestly know. It seems from what we know that he knew what sort of crooked dealings Individual #1 was all about. So I think it feels like willing participation at this point. I don't know and I would hope that Smith can get what he needs from other ways to get convictions of them both.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Witness 5 removed approx...