Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MissMillie

(39,700 posts)
Tue Jul 11, 2023, 10:30 AM Jul 2023

"election interference"

Sometimes, I'm a bit of a stickler when it comes to the rules.

TFG announced his candidacy for the 2024 Presidential election last November, about a week after the 2022 midterms. Pretty early, but of course we know he did that so that he could claim that any legal action taken against his criminality would be (according to him) "election interference."

Well, the last I heard, TFG had not filed his financial disclosure with the FEC. This is supposed to be done within 30 days of announcing candidacy.

So as far as I'm concerned, DOJ has absolutely no legal obligation to view him as a bonafide candidate. After all--he "forgot to file his paperwork."

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

brooklynite

(96,882 posts)
3. I'm not aware that DOJ is giving him any special consideration as a candidate...
Tue Jul 11, 2023, 12:13 PM
Jul 2023

The ONLY DOJ policy is not taking any new action against a political candidate within 60 days of the Election. That would be September of 2024.

MissMillie

(39,700 posts)
4. I'm not sure that they are either
Tue Jul 11, 2023, 12:42 PM
Jul 2023

But his narrative (ad nauseum) is that the indictments are "election interference"

And I say, DOJ and the courts have every right to continue on their current path.

MLAA

(19,800 posts)
6. Do you think it should be considered special treatment that he was not held in custody on the
Tue Jul 11, 2023, 01:28 PM
Jul 2023

Sharing confidential/secret documents charges like Reality Winner was? As I recall she wasn’t allowed bond. Also she was charged quickly and TFG was given months and months to return the docs. I’d be interested in your thoughts. Thanks in advance.

Fiendish Thingy

(24,055 posts)
7. Trump's candidacy is irrelevant to DOJ at this point
Tue Jul 11, 2023, 01:29 PM
Jul 2023

It certainly doesn’t affect DOJ’s role in his pending trial, as DOJ guidelines only apply to investigations, not trials.

Judge Cannon may have opinions about Trump’s candidacy in relation to his trial, but we haven’t heard them yet.

The only impact Trump’s candidacy will have is if DOJ still has open investigations into him after Labor Day 2024.

If the investigations have been completed by then, and indictments issued and trials pending (and at this point, there doesn’t seem to any indication they won’t be), then Trump’s candidacy won’t affect DOJ’s role or conduct.

Trump’s compliance with the FEC seems to me to be irrelevant to DOJ’s investigations, although it may cause headaches elsewhere.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"election interference"