General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQUESTION, WOULD you ride in a driverless car??
Last edited Sun Jul 16, 2023, 02:49 PM - Edit history (1)
these are all over SAN FRANCISO Now....
| 33 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited | |
| yes I WOULD | |
5 (15%) |
|
| no I WOULD NOT | |
28 (85%) |
|
| i don't know - i would need more research | |
0 (0%) |
|
| 1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
| Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
|
JuJuChen
(2,253 posts)YoshidaYui
(45,093 posts)instead of pulling over they stop dead in the middle of the street ,.. wtf?
musette_sf
(10,463 posts)
Join us:
http://humandriving.org/
On edit: I see the self-drivers every now and then on 280; I give them a wide berth and pass ASAP.
lostnfound
(17,442 posts)Sure
Silent3
(15,909 posts)For all of the problems we know these systems have, and even knowing that some dangerous failures have been suppressed or falsely attributed to human driver failure, the safety level must already be fairly reasonable or a whole lot more horror stories would be coming to light.
I'd guess that the safety level of these systems isn't better than humans yet (which should be the goal), but that it's not far worse.
Iggo
(49,756 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(17,875 posts)I prefer to be in charge of my own destiny when on the road.
uponit7771
(93,504 posts)dembotoz
(16,922 posts)Sympthsical
(10,897 posts)Which is something I loathe doing. (Although that looks like Clement St. in the beginning)
Midnight Writer
(25,206 posts)If this technology takes hold and is perfected, with a long record of reliability and safety, substantiated by voluminous real-world data, then I would ride in a driverless car.
I am sure this day will come, but in the meantime, I'll get along without it.
stopdiggin
(15,167 posts)or Philly? (or the 65 yr old Uber driver - with zero experience and an iPhone taped to the dashboard?)
marble falls
(71,398 posts)ProfessorGAC
(76,141 posts)I need to see a long record of success with a high fraction of all the vehicles being driverless.
Wounded Bear
(63,980 posts)But then I never upgrade my software on versions just out of beta, either.
In a few years? Probably, but I need to see a few million more miles of safe usage.
mike_c
(36,943 posts)...sufficient hours of safe operation in actual, working deployment. They might already have, for all I know. It's like flying. Would you strap yourself into a thin cylinder that cruises at 30,000 feet with no visible means of holding it up? Millions do, because on balance flight has proven safe. Not 100% safe, but safe enough to make the odds favorable.
I think self driving cars will achieve similar favorable odds in time, and when I think they're safe enough I'm sure I'll enjoy riding in them.
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)kimbutgar
(26,985 posts)I saw a video where people have been putting orange cones on the hoods and it disables them.
YoshidaYui
(45,093 posts)SYFROYH
(34,213 posts)Driverless cars are one of those things.
area51
(12,590 posts)YoshidaYui
(45,093 posts)KentuckyWoman
(7,385 posts)When I have to stop driving, driverless would be better than stuck at home.
Arazi
(8,780 posts)That way Ill more likely survive in a crash.
No way would I get in one on a highway going 70 mph
DiverDave
(5,227 posts)Nope
Raine
(31,121 posts)IzzaNuDay
(1,261 posts)NTSB and the automotive safety associations will have to bend over backwards to prove this is 99.999999999% safe for me to trust it
Klarkashton
(5,034 posts)The goddamn things.
