General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPeople who think a movie about plastic dolls.
People who think a movie about plastic dolls is trying to turn their kids gay or trans are now officially known as
Barbie Qs
lame54
(39,771 posts)jaxexpat
(7,794 posts)Celerity
(54,408 posts)calimary
(90,021 posts)RockRaven
(19,375 posts)These idiots choose to be angry and outraged first, and look for a target second. It could literally be ANY film, tv show, book, song, magazine article, commercial, sporting event, etc. If the Barbie movie never existed the same exact chuckle-fucks would be screaming the same exact way about some different thing at the same exact moment. Their need to be loud and obnoxious is the root cause, it's got nothing to do with the subject of their yammering.
calimary
(90,021 posts)WTF is WRONG with those jerks?
On second thought, I'm not that interested in their excuses, and I care even less.
AltairIV
(1,043 posts)"Those idiots choose to be angry and outraged first, and look for a target second." That is the entire essence of their existence. Life has passed them by, the new technology confuses them, society has accepted and welcomed those once considered outsiders or hidden from view and they are frightened and scared and desperately want to go back. F*ck them, leave them behind.
LastDemocratInSC
(4,242 posts)especially about having been passed by in American life (largely their own choice) and society's increasing acceptance of previously shunned "outsiders" (validating the maxim that "prejudice rarely survives one's experience"
.
czarjak
(13,639 posts)My neighbor refuses to concede that facts and truths aren't negotiable. (Still taking Trump too)
Celerity
(54,408 posts)czarjak
(13,639 posts)Celerity
(54,408 posts)czarjak
(13,639 posts)Backseat Driver
(4,671 posts)is beyond me. I'd bet that pointed rage toward GQP would be okay, though? I tried to help by following rules I had learned; then I, the apparent scapegoat of their discontent, tried to escape all people without rage boundaries when they asked me never to speak to them again. Speak?--I wouldn't listen either! More familially infectious than a pandemic they were, and I naive. So when you finally sever the lies and gaslighting, it's difficult to live with one's consequences for attempting to be kind, compassionate, and utterly failing to make a dent; just give them what they claimed they've always wanted. Just never stopped trying to learn better ways of living, practical in the challenge, yet kind, but that's always left me anxious and frustrated on the journey of past, present, and future, so if I rant it's because I'm still pretty gullible to the "learned" authoritarian parts of my past. I apologize! that I have no kindness for that betrayal anymore!
DARK series (Netflix) character says you die 3 times: 1st when you lose naivete; 2nd when you lose innocence; 3rd time for good when you end up a "twinkle." Back then, you were adult at 21; I entered "woke" at 19 by not following their rules any longer. The signs of the 3rd death coming soon are all around; everything's connected. Maybe? Why? keep being the questions I need answered - What method will fate choose. I've needed some better mantras to change what's fated for me in my world; to accept the seeded responsibilities, to trust and accept the consequences of "staying too long at the fair," by "obeying their rules." that I willingly chose not soon enough and then promised in error. DU supports me accepting the consequences, past and present...I still hope for the future though what may come before that time is indeed pretty terrifying.
republianmushroom
(22,326 posts)ALBliberal
(3,341 posts)on DU that the right wing is condemning it! So now I have to see it. Taking my daughters and mother in law! Cant wait! (Unintended consequences?)
Conjuay
(3,067 posts)My son said people going to see barbie were all wearing pink, while those queuing for Oppenheimer were wearing black. He said some people appeared to be in the theaters to see both, and were wearing pink AND black.
Shades of Rocky Horror Picture show.
rsdsharp
(12,002 posts)Not because of manufactured political outrage, but because I have no interest in a film about dolls, let alone a live action movie about dolls who are supposed to be 19 and 17, and who are played by actors who are 33 and 42, respectively.
orleans
(36,919 posts)i didn't give a shit about barbies when i was a kid -- i don't care about them now.
and
i don't have a kid bugging me to take them to see the movie.
my kid (who is grown up) liked the disney princess dolls but she didn't give a crap about the barbies either.
rsdsharp
(12,002 posts)was to pull the heads off of my older sisters to piss her off.
orleans
(36,919 posts)William Gustafson
(553 posts)That GI Joe came in an violated her and Ken just stood there, watching....
NJCher
(43,165 posts)I think I was about 8, maybe 9 or 10, when I formed my little semiinars. Here were the results:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=18110035
orleans
(36,919 posts)kskiska
(27,165 posts)I was too old for a Barbie Doll. Mine were baby dolls that didn't do much of anything except say "Mama."
orthoclad
(4,728 posts)Literally.
Plastic is burying us.
soldierant
(9,354 posts)But Kate McKinnon is also in it.
CrispyQ
(40,969 posts)Enjoy the ride.
Wednesdays
(22,603 posts)IIRC, Barbie was voiced by Jodi Benson, who also voiced Ariel in the original Little Mermaid.
meadowlander
(5,133 posts)but lots of people are still passionate about things they loved as kids (Star Wars, Legos, Transformers, GI Joes, comic book characters, sports teams etc.). There's nothing wrong with that and I don't think being judgmental about other peoples' childhood passions accomplishes anything or, frankly, says much about your own level of maturity.
Also, Barbie may have been initially marketed as 19 but many of her "careers" like doctor, business executive, president, judge, astrophysicist, etc. skew older. Age has always been a bit fluid and besides the point in the Barbie-verse. A welcome relief to women who are told by society that their value starts to wane at 25 and disappears completely in their mid 40s.
I was never really into dolls but I can see how people like Barbie. Back in the 50s and 60s it was one of the first toys to start changing mentalities about women in the workplace. Most dolls before Barbie emphasized maternal caregiving for the child but Barbie is more about projecting ambition for girls and women once they grow up. It was also one of the first mainstream companies to have more diversity in its dolls.
Mattel has copped reasonable flak for promoting unrealistic standards of beauty and contributing to body images issues for girls. If you want to continue critiquing Barbie along those lines, fine. But "yuck, dolls!" and Margot Robbie is too old (at 33!) to play a beauty icon just smacks of the kind of misogyny that girls have been putting up with since the second they stepped out of the house and onto a playground with boys.
rsdsharp
(12,002 posts)If they want to see the movie, more power to them. I didnt denigrate them. I sure as hell didnt say Yuck, dolls. The movie is not for me. Neither is soccer, mens or womens. I wont follow the World Cup. If you choose to, have at it.
Barbara Millicent Roberts age was established by Mattel as being 19. In all the years of Barbie, and there have been 64 of them, Barbies appearance has remained that of a 19 year old, regardless of what profession she is practicing. If you can show me where Mattel has said shes aged, fine. I dont think you can.
Is it also misogynistic to point out the silliness of a 42 year old male playing a 17 year old? They couldnt find any actors more age appropriate to the roles. Id suggest you not call this 69 year old ageist.
meadowlander
(5,133 posts)but I've seen most of the Marvel films and a lot of them are really good because they aren't ultimately about comic books - they're about friendship, family, overcoming our weaknesses, standing up for what's right, creative problem solving, etc. All the big universal stuff.
I'm not really into sports but Bend it Like Beckham is one of my favorite films and I love Hoosiers, Ted Lasso, Breaking Away, etc. They aren't really about the sports but about telling human stories well.
So if the Barbie movie gets great reviews and wins awards, I'll probably see it even though I'm not that into Barbie. From what I can see in the trailer, it's not a film "about dolls" but a film about growing up and moving beyond fantasy while retaining that spark and passion that makes you you and gives you joy. Sounds interesting and it would be a shame to write it off because "it's just a film about dolls".
And as I said above, Barbie and Ken's ages are completely beside the point and always have been within the stories themselves. The point is that your age is the least interesting thing about you compared with what you do. And that's a powerful and necessary point to make to women and girls (still) who are told by our culture that their age contributes to their worth.
Ken's point is that he supports Barbie no matter what and doesn't feel threatened by her success. Who gives a shit if he is 17, 42 or 109? He's there to be a role model for little girls of the type of man they should be looking for in their life when so many of them have fathers and brothers and uncles and grandfathers and peers who tell them to sit at the back of the bus and not make too much fuss. That outshining a man makes them a "bitch" and that nobody will love them unless they subsume all of their life's ambitions into propping other people up.
rsdsharp
(12,002 posts)MY point, is that I should be allowed to make my own choices, for my own reasons, as should everyone. I dont have to Try it you might like it, because you, or anyone else, did.
meadowlander
(5,133 posts)I'm asking you to have a greater awareness of the cultural context your comments are falling into. I'm asking you to think about the women and girls in your life and the ones reading this board and the cultural messages that your comments reinforce.
Like the ten million messages a day sent to little girls that the things they like are stupid and less than the things little boys like.
Like the hundred million messages a day that tell them their worth comes from their youth and beauty not their skills or personality.
You didn't have to stop by and spend part of your day commenting on why you don't want to see this movie and to let everyone know "I have no interest in a film about dolls!" "And I'm certainly not going to see a movie with a 33 year old actress cast as a 19 year old in it!" You don't see me wasting my time in the baseball forum complaining about how tedious baseball is and then insisting "you can't make me watch it" and "it's just not for me!"
I'm just asking you to reflect honestly about why you felt the need to do that. You absolutely can make your own choices. I'm just asking you (and anyone with a habit of casually trashing "girly" things) to consider making better and more thoughtful ones. Nobody here cares if you see the movie or not except to the extent that your public insistence that you won't see it because "it's a film about dolls" reinforces negative misogynistic cultural messages for women and girls that their interests are trivial and bad.
Why not be a bit more open minded? Why not try to see things from the perspective of someone different from you? Or at a minimum why not hold back from trashing something just because you don't know that much about it and it isn't to your taste? Save your $12 if you want and watch something else. But think about the things that you say and write and how they impact others.
It's totally up to you.
rsdsharp
(12,002 posts)Im done.
Snooper9
(484 posts)I certainly hope not he's "just Ken" LOL
PatrickforB
(15,426 posts)Wonder Why
(7,029 posts)have probably tripled the value of their collections, anyway.
ShazzieB
(22,590 posts)niyad
(132,440 posts)PatSeg
(53,214 posts)Iggo
(49,927 posts)Been that way for decades.
housecat
(3,138 posts)Iggo
(49,927 posts)Last edited Sat Jul 22, 2023, 07:23 PM - Edit history (1)
Simón.
MiHale
(13,032 posts)paleotn
(22,218 posts)weak little whiny shits.
11 Bravo
(24,310 posts)are definitely white.
MLAA
(19,745 posts)You win the week!
Snackshack
(2,587 posts)...had a hardon for ken and barbie. These are the same people who saw penis outlines... in the cartoon dust clouds of The Lion King... Lilo & Stitch were apparently rabidly climate change influencers, i guess. I don't think there has been a running of Snow White in a theater since it was released that they have not taken umbridge with one of the Dwarves and as 1 person told me a longtime ago about the movies.. "it turns kids gay"... I literally had the same reaction to this that Colonel Landa did when he heard she broke her leg mountain climbing...
meadowlander
(5,133 posts)but I'll be surprised if you can't get it in one:

Jim__
(15,222 posts)Mysterian
(6,486 posts)It's amazing how many gullible idiots walk among us.
Initech
(108,783 posts)You've got a lot more problems than a movie whose target audience is young girls. Seek professional help immediately.
kimbutgar
(27,248 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)off, it's Margo Robbie.
Movies are fantasy anyway.
JanMichael
(25,725 posts)The rest of the Barbie's and Kens are also stacked with talent.
It's just a movie.
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)Were any of them gay?
How many young girls played with dolls? And later in life it didn't keep them in that frame of mind?
Trueblue Texan
(4,464 posts)AKwannabe
(6,890 posts)Trueblue Texan
(4,464 posts)Tetrachloride
(9,624 posts)Danascot
(5,232 posts)I was puzzled and amused when I read that people were linking the two movies. However the essay the above quote is from is thought provoking.
Barbie and Oppenheimer tell the same terrifying story
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/07/19/barbie-oppenheimer-movies-anthropocene/
This piece is pay-walled. If anyone can provide a link to a non-paywall version it would be helpful.
wryter2000
(47,940 posts)Could I get some ribs?
AllaN01Bear
(29,495 posts)kept it to her self.


