General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDear MSNBC (re Hunter Biden)
The Hunter Biden legal case only tracks with the maga cult. No one else cares. Hunter isn't on any ballot anywhere. Yes, the Republicans will harp on it. They were harping on it before. They weren't going to stop harping on it EVEN IF he accepted the plea deal. Your analysis that this is a crucial election issue makes me laugh. I'm sure that as the day goes on wiser guest analysts will agree with me. I'm betting the president agrees with me.
Polly Hennessey
(8,925 posts)Some Media love the trivial.
Caliman73
(11,767 posts)From the Conservative standpoint: It is a way to smear Joe Biden. Since they have no policy issues on which to attack Biden, they are trying to link his son's behavior with the Presidency, which from all accounts, have NO link whatsoever. It is a standard dirty trick from people who have no desire to govern, but want POWER.
From the Media standpoint: This is a juicy "horse race" or "conflict story". The media is CREATING the effect on the election that they are saying, "can have an effect on the election". They want ratings rather than to inform. I am sure that some think it is an important story, but it really isn't. The REAL story is why Republicans are trying to smear the President rather than focusing on policies they think will convince voters to choose them.
BaronChocula
(4,691 posts)from Chris Jansing opening her show every day with "INFLATION! BIDEN! MIDTERMS!" a year ago. Drama, drama, drama. Why do I still watch!
PCIntern
(28,526 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(136,931 posts)MayReasonRule
(4,136 posts)I don't personally know as I have purposefully avoided viewing Hunter Biden's dick pic.
It's rumored as such...
Quakerfriend
(5,882 posts)breaking news. My thought as I listened to MSNBC was O.K., I guess more from Jack Smith is about to drop.
Rebl2
(17,897 posts)felt it was because the judge rejected his plea deal. I thought the judge would accept the deal and she said no to it.
BillyBobBrilliant
(805 posts)People Magazine, and National Enquirer for a three way.
PatSeg
(53,378 posts)then maybe they can find time in their 24/7 schedule to actually cover some other news as well. It seems they cover the same three, maybe four stories all day long. Then they bring in panels of "experts" as filler to rehash whatever story they've reported. If they need filler so badly, maybe they should look around and report "news".
And god forbid if some celebrity dies! Then apparently the whole world stops and that is the only story, sometimes for days.
BaronChocula
(4,691 posts)I wonder if it's because of lack of budget, lack of editorial imagination, or both.
jaxexpat
(7,794 posts)That Biden has this "chink" in his narrative has a man bites dog attraction factor because his administration is rational, respectable and successful. In short, it's a 180 from his predecessor and the Republican party.
BaronChocula
(4,691 posts)I feel the editorial class in the moderate news media feels they aren't being "fair and objective" unless they find things to be equally enraged over for "both sides." It can't possibly be a fact that Biden is more ethically and morally sound than any Republican in office or currently seeking office. They're afraid of seeming unfair to people who don't matter (Fox News Nation).
jaxexpat
(7,794 posts)I don't think editors ever even look at the dialogue/print above their names. I think they let algorithms do their jobs for them.
PatSeg
(53,378 posts)but they also seem to try too hard to compete for ratings. In the process, so many actual news stories get sidelined. Right now I get email news alerts from both The New York Times and The Washington Post, and I'm shocked at how many stories never get even a mention on cable TV news.
I like a certain amount of commentary with my news, but it seems that in recent years, most of cable news is commentary. So we end up hearing the same story told from numerous different points of view over and over again. I suppose that could be both lack of budget and lack of imagination - it certainly comes across as rather lazy.
I used to watch hours of MSNBC every day, but now I rarely watch an entire hour.
LakeArenal
(29,949 posts)AnotherMother4Peace
(5,173 posts)for his investment skills which sucks, e.g.: his gross overpayment and economic disaster of 666 Fifth Ave.
BlueIn_W_Pa
(842 posts)and they say Jr Biden got $17 million,
I have to say well, just one Trump jr got $2000 million (because they generally don't get million v billion)
snowybirdie
(6,733 posts)K & R
Kennah
(14,578 posts)mopinko
(73,844 posts)or is it the new clenis?
dem4decades
(14,288 posts)TalenaGor
(1,227 posts)ABC was covering the UFO hearing and OMG - so maybe they were trying to squash the significance of the UFO story?
https://ca.sports.yahoo.com/news/watch-live-house-panel-holds-160732913.html
LetMyPeopleVote
(181,437 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Leith
(7,864 posts)Neither should they harp on news that only magats care about.
Your posts seem very... uhh... interesting.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)crimycarny
(2,098 posts)To report what's going on in the Hunter Biden case is fine, but to state this may have "election consequences" is an opinion, not fact.
This is the whole "horse race" crap that the media loves, regardless of political bent. Ratings, ratings, ratings. With 7x24 news they have to over-dramatize everything.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)If Rachel Maddow opined that it wouldn't have an impact, nobody here would be complaining.
crimycarny
(2,098 posts)Um...It's "The Rachel Maddow Show" for a reason. The whole point of Rachel Maddow's show is to give her own opinion/analysis/spin on current events.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)Every MSNBC show includes opinions by experts, pundits, politicians, etc.
crimycarny
(2,098 posts)I believe my original comment was my observation that with 7x24 media competing for ratings, there is a tendency to try and create a "horse race" and over-dramatize issues for ratings.
No one is "demanding" anything, just making an observation.
Why so angry?
BaronChocula
(4,691 posts)Is the Hunter Biden plea a news item? Yes.
Should it require an hour plus of uninterrupted coverage on non-Fox News channels? Absolutely not.
It is of some interest that Hunter Biden is in legal trouble. As of yet, outside of the fantasy realm of Fox et al, this really has no impact on the lives of Americans like, say, a reputed lying former president with a history of fraud (charities, universities) who tried to overturn an election because he didn't like the fact that he lost, and found himself under looming indictments for all of the failed rackets he put in order to prevent his rightful removal from office.
Of course, if you live in Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham's Hateville, where you're trying to convince everyone that there is such a thing as "The Biden Crime Family" then you would be thrilled to see as much coverage as possible of this inconsequential story that will have virtually no impact on the election, aside from it taking precious time from real issues during presidential debates.
So yes, I guess MSNBC should carry stories liberals care about since in my experience liberals care about all news items and the DU news feed reflects that. The context of the original post was in response to coverage overkill and infantile analysis. I hope this answers your question.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)I doubt you'll see the same focus tomorrow.
spanone
(142,006 posts)MichMan
(17,325 posts)From an earlier post
twodogsbarking
(19,209 posts)There is no reality.
brooklynite
(96,882 posts)...considering all the pro-Biden, anti-Trump stories and opinions they allow.
Warpy
(114,650 posts)You're right, the simple tax case was settled. He's probably going to have to pay the IRS a bundle. That's old news and what the MAGAts are hyperventilating over is not news, at all.
IcyPeas
(25,718 posts)Then I change the channel. I just cant take it anymore. I don't even get to the first mention of "Hunter".
Has any single human EVER been the topic of every damn news outlet for the past 9 years???
ENOUGH!!!
ENOUGH!!!!!!
Tune in to BBC world news. It's a little better.
tritsofme
(19,930 posts)It will do you good. I probably havent popped it on all summer.
And guess what? I missed absolutely nothing.
dchill
(42,660 posts)...until 4:00 pm.
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)I watch Deadline Whitehouse. Maybe some Chris and record Lawrence.
gordianot
(15,787 posts)By now Hunter knows whatever the charge in court he will have to pay and whatever privilege he had is gone.
JohnnyRingo
(20,971 posts)No media outlet is going to be scooped on a story just because it hurts people's feelings. I would be furious if MSNBC buried a topical story and I had to hear it elsewhere.
Leave it to the pundits to sort out the headline. That's their job.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)The judge got how much payola?
former9thward
(33,424 posts)And where is the evidence "payola" was involved?
BidenRocks
(3,453 posts)There is no misrepresentation. They do not do news. Just politics.
CNN does some news.
I agree that Hunter is as exciting as Benghazi.