General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKentucky gov plans to ignore law banning him from appointing Dem if McConnell steps down: report
snip
He added, "Beshear either says, Hey, Republican Party, thank you for your list, but Im appointing whoever I want and then that immediately gets challenged in court, or you could see Beshear taking the route of filing a lawsuit. I mean, hes got the guts to defy it.
The Washington Times Kerry Picket reports, "In Kentucky, Mr. Beshear set the stage to challenge the 2021 law when he declared it unconstitutional and vetoed it. The legislatures Republican supermajority overrode the veto. In a veto message, the governor cited the U.S. Constitutions 17th Amendment passed in 1912, which states that the legislature 'may empower the executive' to make temporary appointments to fill a senate vacancy."
As Beshear wrote at the time, "The bill
upends a century of precedent by delegating the power to select the representative of all Kentuckians to an unelected, unaccountable committee of an organization that represents only a fraction of Kentuckians. The Seventeenth Amendment does not authorize legislatures to direct how the Governor makes an appointment to fill vacancies, and the legislature may not impose an additional qualification on who the Governor may appoint beyond the qualifications for a United States Senator set forth in the Constitution.
https://www.alternet.org/kentucky-gov-ignore-law-mcconnell/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon
It could happen.
elleng
(141,926 posts)Bringing a gun to a gun battle.
elleng
(141,926 posts)yardwork
(69,360 posts)Sneederbunk
(17,488 posts)Repugs will be wheeling him in on a handcart.
walkingman
(10,860 posts)calguy
(6,154 posts)peppertree
(23,336 posts)"No, you nitwit! That's Walt Disney!!"
Zambero
(9,988 posts)Using different tactics for each, but flaunting precedent nevertheless. It's about time that Karma smacked him and his party in the face!
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)But yes, glad to see a Democrat willing to play hardball like the Republicans do...
The Kentucky governor's 2028 stock has just risen.
I don't know much about him, except that he managed to get elected in Kentucky,
and so far is favored for re-election by ten poll points---
but this one thing, I really like....
LenaBaby61
(6,991 posts)JudyM
(29,785 posts)More, please. Obama was far too gentle in addressing McConnells deplorable judiciary power grab.
much, much more!!!!!
McConnell was the driving force in getting that insulting law passed.
Here in Georgia, when Carter's son ran for governor, the GOP preemptively passed a law forbidding medicaid expansion.
msongs
(73,752 posts)DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)even MAGATs...
BigmanPigman
(55,137 posts)I think he needs to be extremely unhealthy before he or party members would encourage that decision.
Hillary said that Feinstein shouldn't step down since it would hurt Dems by keeping more judges from being appointed. Not the exact same situation as McConnell but she has a good point.
malaise
(296,083 posts)Just like all of ours
leftieNanner
(16,159 posts)Senator Feinstein asked for a temporary replacement while she recovered from shingles on the Judiciary Committee and the Repugs said NO! That allowed them to block all judicial nominees until she returned. I guess the committees are set up at the beginning of each term and any changes have to be approved.
Mitch won't leave except on a stretcher.
usonian
(25,300 posts)Who will play Transylvanian Lullaby for Mitch?
ZonkerHarris
(25,577 posts)froze the other day.
Dude saw the Scythe.
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)but that is open to debate....
Diamond_Dog
(40,569 posts)Hey, Republicans always get away with ignoring rules. Two can play at that game.
Assuming Turtle steps down. Or is carried out feet first
.
jimfields33
(19,382 posts)To mention this. Kentucky is still a very red state. Last thing we need is a motivated Republican Party.
SickOfTheOnePct
(8,710 posts)I really like him, but would have preferred he wait.
On the other hand, he is way ahead in the polls.
Personally, I think governors should appoint Senators from the same party as the Senator who left office because thats the party the people of the state elected.
By the same token if someone is elected in one party and then switches, I think they should have to vacate the seat a special election should be held.
I wouldnt put it past the KY legislature to convene and take away his right to appoint a Senator .
jimfields33
(19,382 posts)Senate departing party. I think that was during the primary where bernie and Elizabeth were running. I think I love the idea of switching parties a new election should be held. Thats brilliant.
Maru Kitteh
(31,759 posts)1) May does not equal will
2) Empower means to grant or give some measure of power where it did not previously and perhaps naturally exist before.
Of course I'm not a lawyer.
Lawyers, am I correct on this?
bucolic_frolic
(55,129 posts)This GOP legislature sought to place restrictions on the Governor's choice and pool of selections. That's empower and direct, or empower with limits.
The 17th Amendment to the Constitution enabled the direct election of Senators by voters. Previously state legislatures appointed them. So this GOP bill tries to restore powers removed by the 17th Amendment - having a hand in appointing Senators.
Maru Kitteh
(31,759 posts)I think this could be an interesting test for sure.
appmanga
(1,492 posts)...reads to me that the legislature may give the governor the chance to appoint someone, but it goes no further than that. Beshear's argument is the legislature can't add any more qualifications to the those outlined in the Constitution. I find that argument persuasive. Also, the governor is empowered by the Constitution to call a special election if they so choose.
onenote
(46,139 posts)When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.
So, if there is a vacancy, Beshear "shall" call for an election to fill the vacancy; BUT, as a temporary measure to fill the vacancy until such election is held, the state legislature "may" empower the governor to appoint a replacement.
Given that the legislature doesn't have to provide for a temporary appointment if it so chooses and given that the laws throughout the country vary in the conditions placed by the legislature on the temporary appointment of a senator, I have my doubts that Beshear's legal theory that the legislator can't condition the appointment on it being a member of the party that previously held the seat.
bucolic_frolic
(55,129 posts)Let the courts rule. Courts still decide things, not a microcosm of party hacks.
You can't tiptoe through life being afraid of everything.
Cheezoholic
(3,719 posts)and the Democrats in the legislature should have gone on the offensive and taken this law to court the minute it was overridden.
usonian
(25,300 posts)
sheshe2
(97,620 posts)so great. thanks.
Mr.Bill
(24,906 posts)refrigerated limousine to take him back and forth to the Capitol building.
sheshe2
(97,620 posts)Rhiannon12866
(255,525 posts)ZonkerHarris
(25,577 posts)Marthe48
(23,174 posts)is to stop the power grab.
sellitman
(11,745 posts)oldsoftie
(13,538 posts)DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)when it was to his advantage to do so.
mountain grammy
(29,034 posts)die you sonofabitch.
70sEraVet
(5,482 posts)RandySF
(84,260 posts)He cant afford to nationalize the race in such a red state, especially when theres no announced vacancy.
sheshe2
(97,620 posts)RandySF
(84,260 posts)Polybius
(21,900 posts)Isn't he up for reelection in November?
sl8
(17,110 posts)The story is from the Washington Examiner and the source is a lawyer's speculation. I think the headline came fron Raw Story.
The quote from the Governor is from when he vetoed the legislation. I haven't seen anything from' him regarding replacing McConnell.
Here's another article on the same topic, from the Lexington Herald-Leader
Ky. Dems predict challenge to Senate replacement law amid focus on McConnells health
BY AUSTIN HORN
Read more at: https://www.kentucky.com/news/politics-government/article277714983.html
onenote
(46,139 posts)ShazzieB
(22,582 posts)This could get interesting! Or at least it will if Mitch decides to step down early instead of trying to hold out till January 2027.
I've got my 🍿 all ready to pop any time, whether it be for a turtle retirement (a returtlement?), new TFG indictments, or all of the above!
sheshe2
(97,620 posts)Did you see him? He has been very ill for a long time and the gOP are going to cover it up for as long as they can.
Returtlement.
ShazzieB
(22,582 posts)But like you said, the GOP will prop him up for as long as they possibly can, so it may be a while regardless.
rpannier
(24,924 posts)This is an election year in KY.
Governor's race is this year
Attilatheblond
(8,876 posts)and they could both moon the GOP in state legislature?
AllyCat
(18,840 posts)They would never put forward a name that wasnt entrenched GQP loon
PortTack
(35,820 posts)AllyCat
(18,840 posts)is $hitty, but its still the law. If he can find a way, Im all for it, but Dems follow the law, unlike the horrible republicans.
SickOfTheOnePct
(8,710 posts)But he truly believes its unconstitutional, then I guess he can make his case in court.
By signaling his plans, hes basically just told the KY legislature to take away his ability to appoint Senators.
HariSeldon
(541 posts)Beshear can make the appointment of a Democrat, and the KY legislature can fight him in court. The worst that can happen is the court says, "No, you can't appoint that person. If you appoint anyone to fill the vacancy, it must be someone from the list provided by the committee." Meanwhile, KY only has one Senator while the court case plays out through all it's appeals, leaving the Senate more firmly in the hands of the Democrats.
SickOfTheOnePct
(8,710 posts)I personally believe that all governors should appoint from the party of the vacancy in these cases, as thats the party that the entire state voted for. I realize thats not a popular opinion here, but Im ok with that.
By the same token, I think that when any legislator switches parties in the middle of a term, a special election should have to be held, as thats not the party that people voted for.
MayReasonRule
(4,099 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,453 posts)There has to be a case or controversy for the courts to hear it (Article III). You go against the law, the Republicans challenge it, and then you've got a controversy that can be ruled on.
DemocratInPa
(743 posts)Just hope and pray this won't hurt his reelection chances..
Beshear is an amazing Gov.
gopiscrap
(24,733 posts)republianmushroom
(22,323 posts)Music Man
(1,664 posts)The article references no "plans" from Beshear, who has not commented on this at all. This comes from a report by the conservative Washington Times that quotes Democratic sources who say Beshear has "set the stage" to appoint a Democrat based on his attempted veto of the bill in 2021.
Don't get excited here, folks. Not happening.
wnylib
(26,008 posts)They are as credible as a source as the National Enquired or Fox TV.
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)I wish the son-of-a-bitch a fast trip.
rpannier
(24,924 posts)Especially since this is an election year in KY
Trying to gin up the republikkans for November 7?
onenote
(46,139 posts)If, and when, the circumstances arise where there is a vacancy to be filled, we'll see what he does. I have my doubts that his legal theory for ignoring the statute would be sustained.
mahina
(20,645 posts)He would do the same exactly minus the heads up and legal argument.
DemocraticPatriot
(5,410 posts)and as a matter of fact, he did say that already
about the Garland nomination,
which was clearly a STOLEN Supreme Court seat.
William769
(59,147 posts)Oops I should have chosen that word more wisely.
sheshe2
(97,620 posts)You.
![]()
UpInArms
(54,973 posts)Strom Thurman into the senate on a gurney to vote?

President George W. Bush wishes Sen. Strom Thurmond happy birthday during a birthday celebration at the White House Dec. 6, 2002. The South Carolina senator turned 100 years old Thursday. White House photo by Eric Draper.

WAX2003062709 - WASHINGTON, June 27 (UPI) -- Former Sen. Strom Thurmond, R-S.C., the oldest and longest serving Senator, died on June 26, 2003, at 100 years old. Sen. Strom Thurmond, R-S.C., blows out a candle during his 100th birthday party on Dec. 5, 2002, on Capitol Hill. The lipstick on his forehead came from a Marilyn Monroe look-a-like. rlw/Roger L. Wollenberg/FILE UPI
tritsofme
(19,900 posts)I never understood this idea that a long serving politician has somehow earned the right to die in his seat. When they are no longer capable of representing their constituents, they should resign.
Say what you will of Feinsteins age related issues, at least she is declining to seek reelection next year.
cstanleytech
(28,471 posts)of course the States Constitution says he can.
In that case the law is invalid until they revoke that part of the States Constitution.
texasfiddler
(2,199 posts)
LetMyPeopleVote
(179,822 posts)onenote
(46,139 posts)Also, in addition to Kentucky, six other states (Hawaii, Maryland, Montana, North Carolina, West Virginia and Wyoming) require their governor to fill Senate vacancies from a list of nominees submitted by the previous senators party.
JT45242
(4,043 posts)National assembly of Christian church (disciples of Christ) is in Louisville and he came and spoke as governor.
He talked about taking care of all, protecting the weak, all the stuff that Jesus taught.
He is actually a man if faith.
Proud to say that the assembly voted a condemnation of Christian nationalism as a dangerous and violent twisting of what following God should be.
He was obviously still upset deeply when he talked about his friend who was killed in a mass shooting a mile away from the conference center
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)My son told me about Beshear's statement, but I never got around to looking for the news.
Beshear knows the law. I'm inclined to trust his evaluation of the Kentucky Constitution over Moscow Mitch and co-conspirators.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Even the biggest critics have to admit here's a spine. He's probably right, too.